Discriminant validity and test re-test reproducibility of a gait assessment in patients with vestibular dysfunction.

Q2 Medicine BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Pub Date : 2015-10-22 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s12901-015-0019-8
Annatina Schmidheiny, Jaap Swanenburg, Dominik Straumann, Eling D de Bruin, Ruud H Knols
{"title":"Discriminant validity and test re-test reproducibility of a gait assessment in patients with vestibular dysfunction.","authors":"Annatina Schmidheiny,&nbsp;Jaap Swanenburg,&nbsp;Dominik Straumann,&nbsp;Eling D de Bruin,&nbsp;Ruud H Knols","doi":"10.1186/s12901-015-0019-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gait function may be impaired in patients with vestibular disorders, making gait assessment in the clinical setting relevant for this patient population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the discriminant validity of a gait assessment protocol between patients with vestibular disorders and healthy participants. Furthermore, test re-test reproducibility and the measurement error of gait performance measures in patients with vestibular lesions was performed under different walking conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Gait parameters of thirty-five patients with vestibular disorders and twenty-seven healthy controls were assessed twice with the GAITRite® system. Discriminant validity, reproducibility (intra class correlation [ICC]) and the measurement error (standard error of measurement [SEM], smallest detectable change [SDC]) were determined for gait speed, cadence and step length. Bland-Altman plots were made to assess systematic bias between tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant effect of grouping on gait performance indicates discriminant validity of gait assessment. All tests revealed differences between patients and healthy controls (p < 0.01). The ICCs for test re-test reproducibility were excellent (0.70-0.96) and measurement error showed acceptable SDC values for gait parameters derived from three walking conditions (9-19 %). Bland-Altman plots indicated no systematic bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Good validity and reproducibility of GAITRite® system measurements suggest that this system could facilitate the study of gait in patients with vestibular disorders in clinical settings. The SDC values for gait are generally small enough to detect changes after a rehabilitation program for patients with vestibular disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":39843,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12901-015-0019-8","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12901-015-0019-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Background: Gait function may be impaired in patients with vestibular disorders, making gait assessment in the clinical setting relevant for this patient population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the discriminant validity of a gait assessment protocol between patients with vestibular disorders and healthy participants. Furthermore, test re-test reproducibility and the measurement error of gait performance measures in patients with vestibular lesions was performed under different walking conditions.

Methods: Gait parameters of thirty-five patients with vestibular disorders and twenty-seven healthy controls were assessed twice with the GAITRite® system. Discriminant validity, reproducibility (intra class correlation [ICC]) and the measurement error (standard error of measurement [SEM], smallest detectable change [SDC]) were determined for gait speed, cadence and step length. Bland-Altman plots were made to assess systematic bias between tests.

Results: A significant effect of grouping on gait performance indicates discriminant validity of gait assessment. All tests revealed differences between patients and healthy controls (p < 0.01). The ICCs for test re-test reproducibility were excellent (0.70-0.96) and measurement error showed acceptable SDC values for gait parameters derived from three walking conditions (9-19 %). Bland-Altman plots indicated no systematic bias.

Conclusions: Good validity and reproducibility of GAITRite® system measurements suggest that this system could facilitate the study of gait in patients with vestibular disorders in clinical settings. The SDC values for gait are generally small enough to detect changes after a rehabilitation program for patients with vestibular disorders.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前庭功能障碍患者步态评估的判别效度和测试再测试可重复性。
背景:前庭功能障碍患者的步态功能可能受损,因此在临床环境中对这类患者进行步态评估具有重要意义。本研究的目的是评估前庭疾病患者和健康参与者步态评估方案的判别效度。此外,在不同的步行条件下,对前庭病变患者的步态性能测量进行了测试的重复性和测量误差。方法:采用GAITRite®系统对35例前庭功能障碍患者和27例健康对照者的步态参数进行两次评估。测定步态速度、步速和步长的判别效度、重现性(类内相关性[ICC])和测量误差(测量标准误差[SEM]、最小可检测变化[SDC])。采用Bland-Altman图评估试验间的系统偏倚。结果:分组对步态表现有显著影响,表明步态评估具有判别效度。结论:GAITRite®系统测量结果具有良好的有效性和可重复性,表明该系统可以在临床环境中促进前庭疾病患者的步态研究。步态的SDC值通常小到足以检测前庭疾病患者康复计划后的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of ear, nose and throat disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders (ISSN 1472-6815) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Cochlear implantation as a treatment for single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss: a randomized controlled evaluation of cost-utility. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria isolated from patients with ear discharge in Jimma Town, Southwest, Ethiopia. Staphylococcus aureus from patients with chronic rhinosinusitis show minimal genetic association between polyp and non-polyp phenotypes. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma: a population-based survival analysis. Odontogenic necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review of the literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1