Dental Health and the Type of Antipsychotic Treatment in Inpatients with Schizophrenia.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences Pub Date : 2015-01-01
Alexander Grinshpoon, Shlomo P Zusman, Abraham Weizman, Alexander M Ponizovsky
{"title":"Dental Health and the Type of Antipsychotic Treatment in Inpatients with Schizophrenia.","authors":"Alexander Grinshpoon,&nbsp;Shlomo P Zusman,&nbsp;Abraham Weizman,&nbsp;Alexander M Ponizovsky","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study examined the association between dental conditions in hospitalized patients with ICD-10 schizophrenia and type of antipsychotic treatment. Based on the literature suggesting that atypical antipsychotics are thought to be more tolerable than typical antipsychotics, we hypothesized that hospitalized patients with schizophrenia treated with atypicals would have better dental health than those treated with typicals alone or with a combination of both (combined group).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A representative sample of 348 patients (69% males), aged 51.4 (SD=14.5, range 31-58) years, was assessed on the standardized criteria of the Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth (DMFT) index and component scores. Data on medication were extracted from patients' electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients treated with typicals had significantly higher DMFT index scores than those who received atypicals (23.5±9.9 vs. 19.0±10.5; p < 0.05), and higher Missing (20.2±11.6 vs. 13.5±11.2; p < 0.01) and lower Filled (1.0±2.4 vs. 2.1±3.9; p < 0.05) teeth component scores. No between-group differences in Decayed component scores were found (2.3±3.4 and 3.4±5.0, respectively; p > 0.05). The combined treatment group was situated in between the typicals and atypicals groups on all measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that patients with schizophrenia maintained on atypicals have better dental health than patients treated with typicals or with a combination of both. From an oral health perspective, monotherapy with atypicals is superior to both typical and atypical/typical treatments. Although the choice between typical and atypical antipsychotic agents is based mainly on clinical psychiatric efficacy, the benefit of atypicals with regard to dental health should be taken into consideration in clinician's decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":49288,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study examined the association between dental conditions in hospitalized patients with ICD-10 schizophrenia and type of antipsychotic treatment. Based on the literature suggesting that atypical antipsychotics are thought to be more tolerable than typical antipsychotics, we hypothesized that hospitalized patients with schizophrenia treated with atypicals would have better dental health than those treated with typicals alone or with a combination of both (combined group).

Methods: A representative sample of 348 patients (69% males), aged 51.4 (SD=14.5, range 31-58) years, was assessed on the standardized criteria of the Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth (DMFT) index and component scores. Data on medication were extracted from patients' electronic medical records.

Results: Patients treated with typicals had significantly higher DMFT index scores than those who received atypicals (23.5±9.9 vs. 19.0±10.5; p < 0.05), and higher Missing (20.2±11.6 vs. 13.5±11.2; p < 0.01) and lower Filled (1.0±2.4 vs. 2.1±3.9; p < 0.05) teeth component scores. No between-group differences in Decayed component scores were found (2.3±3.4 and 3.4±5.0, respectively; p > 0.05). The combined treatment group was situated in between the typicals and atypicals groups on all measures.

Conclusions: The results suggest that patients with schizophrenia maintained on atypicals have better dental health than patients treated with typicals or with a combination of both. From an oral health perspective, monotherapy with atypicals is superior to both typical and atypical/typical treatments. Although the choice between typical and atypical antipsychotic agents is based mainly on clinical psychiatric efficacy, the benefit of atypicals with regard to dental health should be taken into consideration in clinician's decision making.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院精神分裂症患者的牙齿健康与抗精神病药物治疗类型
目的:本研究探讨ICD-10精神分裂症住院患者牙齿状况与抗精神病药物治疗类型之间的关系。根据文献表明非典型抗精神病药物被认为比典型抗精神病药物更容易耐受,我们假设住院的精神分裂症患者接受非典型抗精神病药物治疗比单独使用典型抗精神病药物或两者联合治疗(联合组)的患者牙齿健康状况更好。方法:选取348例具有代表性的患者,其中男性占69%,年龄51.4岁(SD=14.5,范围31-58岁),采用DMFT (decay, Missing and filler Teeth,简称DMFT)指数和成分评分的标准化标准进行评估。药物数据从患者的电子病历中提取。结果:典型治疗组DMFT指数得分明显高于非典型治疗组(23.5±9.9比19.0±10.5;p < 0.05),较高的Missing(20.2±11.6∶13.5±11.2;p < 0.01)和低填充(1.0±2.4 vs. 2.1±3.9;P < 0.05)。腐烂成分评分组间无差异(分别为2.3±3.4和3.4±5.0);P > 0.05)。联合治疗组在所有指标上均处于典型组和非典型组之间。结论:结果表明,精神分裂症患者维持非典型治疗比典型治疗或两者结合治疗有更好的牙齿健康。从口腔健康的角度来看,非典型单药治疗优于典型治疗和非典型/典型治疗。虽然典型和非典型抗精神病药物的选择主要基于临床精神病学疗效,但临床医生在决策时应考虑到非典型抗精神病药物对牙齿健康的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: THE ISRAEL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY publishes original articles dealing with the all bio-psycho-social aspects of psychiatry. While traditionally the journal has published manuscripts relating to mobility, relocation, acculturation, ethnicity, stress situations in war and peace, victimology and mental health in developing countries, papers addressing all aspects of the psychiatry including neuroscience, biological psychiatry, psychopharmacology, psychotherapy and ethics are welcome. The Editor also welcomes pertinent book reviews and correspondence. Preference is given to research reports of no more than 5,000 words not including abstract, text, references, tables and figures. There should be no more than 40 references and 4 tables or figures. Brief reports (1,500 words, 5 references) are considered if they have heuristic value. Books to be considered for review should be sent to the editorial office. Selected book reviews are invited by the editor.
期刊最新文献
Evidence Basis for Psychodynamic Self-Psychology in Eating Disorders - A Review Paper. Perversion and the universal law. Does Individual Stigma Predict Mental Health Funding Attitudes? Toward an Understanding of Resource Allocation and Social Climate. Mental Illness Stigma Expressed by Police to Police. 'People with Problems, Not Patients with Illnesses': Using Psychosocial Frameworks to Reduce the Stigma of Psychosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1