Diagnosis of Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome by the Measurement of Heart-Type Fatty Acid Binding Protein in Serum: A Prospective Case Control Study.

Journal of biomarkers Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-02-05 DOI:10.1155/2014/624930
Priscilla Abraham Chandran, Basharat Ara Wani, Oruganti Sai Satish, Noorjahan Mohammed
{"title":"Diagnosis of Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome by the Measurement of Heart-Type Fatty Acid Binding Protein in Serum: A Prospective Case Control Study.","authors":"Priscilla Abraham Chandran, Basharat Ara Wani, Oruganti Sai Satish, Noorjahan Mohammed","doi":"10.1155/2014/624930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A prospective case control study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic performance of serum heart-type fatty acid binding protein (HFABP) in comparison to cardiac TnT and TnI in 33 patients admitted with chest pain, diagnosed as NSTE-ACS (non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome) and 22 healthy controls. Area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was highest for H-FABP (AUC 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.89) versus cTnI (AUC 0.73; 95% CI 0.59-0.84) and cTnT (AUC 0.71; 95% CI 0.57-0.83). The H-FABP level above 6.5 ng/mL showed 56.7% (CI 37.4-74.5) sensitivity, 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.7) negative likelihood ratio (-LR), 100% (CI 84.6-100.0) specificity, and 100% (CI 79.4-100.0) positive predictive value (PPV), 62.9% (CI 44.9-78.5) negative predictive value (NPV). cTnI level above 0.009 μg/L had 40% (CI 22.7-59.4) sensitivity, 0.6 (95% CI 0.4-0.8) -LR, 100% (CI 84.6-100.0) specificity, 100% (CI 73.5-100.0) PPV, and 55% (CI 38.5-70.7) NPV. cTnT showed 46.7% (CI 28.3-65.7) sensitivity, 0.5 (95% CI 0.4-0.7) -LR, 100% (CI 84.6-100.0) specificity, 100% (CI 76.8-100.0) PPV, and 57.9% (CI 40.8-73.7) NPV at level above 9 μg/L. +LR were 12.5 (95% CI 1.8-86.8), 1.7 (95% CI 1.0-3.0), and 1.2 (95% CI 0.8-1.9) for H-FABP, cTnI, and cTnT respectively. In conclusion measurement of H-FABP is a valuable tool in the early diagnosis of patients with chest pain (6-8 hrs) and seems to be a preferred biomarker in the differential diagnosis of NSTE-ACS. More studies are needed to determine whether serum H-FABP further improves diagnostic performance. </p>","PeriodicalId":91105,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomarkers","volume":"2014 ","pages":"624930"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4437357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/624930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A prospective case control study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic performance of serum heart-type fatty acid binding protein (HFABP) in comparison to cardiac TnT and TnI in 33 patients admitted with chest pain, diagnosed as NSTE-ACS (non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome) and 22 healthy controls. Area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was highest for H-FABP (AUC 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.89) versus cTnI (AUC 0.73; 95% CI 0.59-0.84) and cTnT (AUC 0.71; 95% CI 0.57-0.83). The H-FABP level above 6.5 ng/mL showed 56.7% (CI 37.4-74.5) sensitivity, 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.7) negative likelihood ratio (-LR), 100% (CI 84.6-100.0) specificity, and 100% (CI 79.4-100.0) positive predictive value (PPV), 62.9% (CI 44.9-78.5) negative predictive value (NPV). cTnI level above 0.009 μg/L had 40% (CI 22.7-59.4) sensitivity, 0.6 (95% CI 0.4-0.8) -LR, 100% (CI 84.6-100.0) specificity, 100% (CI 73.5-100.0) PPV, and 55% (CI 38.5-70.7) NPV. cTnT showed 46.7% (CI 28.3-65.7) sensitivity, 0.5 (95% CI 0.4-0.7) -LR, 100% (CI 84.6-100.0) specificity, 100% (CI 76.8-100.0) PPV, and 57.9% (CI 40.8-73.7) NPV at level above 9 μg/L. +LR were 12.5 (95% CI 1.8-86.8), 1.7 (95% CI 1.0-3.0), and 1.2 (95% CI 0.8-1.9) for H-FABP, cTnI, and cTnT respectively. In conclusion measurement of H-FABP is a valuable tool in the early diagnosis of patients with chest pain (6-8 hrs) and seems to be a preferred biomarker in the differential diagnosis of NSTE-ACS. More studies are needed to determine whether serum H-FABP further improves diagnostic performance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过测量血清中的心型脂肪酸结合蛋白诊断非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征:一项前瞻性病例对照研究
一项前瞻性病例对照研究评估了血清心型脂肪酸结合蛋白 (HFABP) 与心脏 TnT 和 TnI 的诊断性能,该研究的对象是 33 名被诊断为 NSTE-ACS(非 STE 抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征)的胸痛入院患者和 22 名健康对照者。相对于 cTnI(AUC 0.73;95% CI 0.59-0.84)和 cTnT(AUC 0.71;95% CI 0.57-0.83),H-FABP(AUC 0.79;95% CI 0.66-0.89)的接收者操作曲线下面积(AUC)最高。H-FABP水平高于6.5 ng/mL显示了56.7% (CI 37.4-74.5)的敏感性、0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.7)的阴性似然比(-LR)、100% (CI 84.6-100.0)的特异性和100% (CI 79.4-100.0)的阳性预测值(PPV)、62.9% (CI 44.9-78.5)的阴性预测值(NPV)。cTnT 显示出 46.7% (CI 28. 3-65.7) 的敏感性、0.6 (95% CI 0.4-0.8) -LR、100% (CI 84.6-100.0) 特异性、100% (CI 73.5-100.0) PPV 和 55% (CI 38.5-70.7) NPV。3-65.7)敏感性、0.5(95% CI 0.4-0.7)-LR、100%(CI 84.6-100.0)特异性、100%(CI 76.8-100.0)PPV 和 57.9%(CI 40.8-73.7)NPV。H-FABP、cTnI 和 cTnT 的 +LR 分别为 12.5(95% CI 1.8-86.8)、1.7(95% CI 1.0-3.0)和 1.2(95% CI 0.8-1.9)。总之,H-FABP 测量是早期诊断胸痛患者(6-8 小时)的重要工具,似乎是鉴别诊断 NSTE-ACS 的首选生物标记物。还需要更多的研究来确定血清 H-FABP 是否能进一步提高诊断效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Role of Biomarkers in Diagnosis and Prognostic Evaluation of Acute Pancreatitis” Body Mass Index, Haemoglobin, and Total Lymphocyte Count as a Surrogate for CD4 Count in Resource Limited Settings. The Circadian Rhythm of Copeptin, the C-Terminal Portion of Arginine Vasopressin. Cystatin-C as a Marker for Renal Impairment in Preeclampsia. Association Study between Promoter Polymorphism of TPH1 and Progression of Idiopathic Scoliosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1