The Effects of Sex and Chronic Restraint on Instrumental Learning in Rats.

Neuroscience journal Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-02-28 DOI:10.1155/2013/893126
Angela L McDowell, Kathryn M Heath, Preston E Garraghty
{"title":"The Effects of Sex and Chronic Restraint on Instrumental Learning in Rats.","authors":"Angela L McDowell,&nbsp;Kathryn M Heath,&nbsp;Preston E Garraghty","doi":"10.1155/2013/893126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic stress has been shown to impact learning, but studies have been sparse or nonexistent examining sex or task differences. We examined the effects of sex and chronic stress on instrumental learning in adult rats. Rats were tested in an aversive paradigm with or without prior appetitive experience, and daily body weight data was collected as an index of stress. Relative to control animals, reduced body weight was maintained across the stress period for males (-7%, P ≤ .05) and females (-5%, P ≤ .05). For males, there were within-subject day-by-day differences after asymptotic transition, and all restrained males were delayed in reaching asymptotic performance. In contrast, stressed females were facilitated in appetitive and aversive-only instrumental learning but impaired during acquisition of the aversive transfer task. Males were faster than females in reaching the appetitive shaping criterion, but females were more efficient in reaching the appetitive tone-signaled criterion. Finally, an effect of task showed that while females reached aversive shaping criterion at a faster rate when they had prior appetitive learning, they were impaired in tone-signaled avoidance learning only when they had prior appetitive learning. These tasks reveal important nuances on the effect of stress and sex differences on goal-directed behavior. </p>","PeriodicalId":91144,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience journal","volume":"2013 ","pages":"893126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/893126","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/893126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Chronic stress has been shown to impact learning, but studies have been sparse or nonexistent examining sex or task differences. We examined the effects of sex and chronic stress on instrumental learning in adult rats. Rats were tested in an aversive paradigm with or without prior appetitive experience, and daily body weight data was collected as an index of stress. Relative to control animals, reduced body weight was maintained across the stress period for males (-7%, P ≤ .05) and females (-5%, P ≤ .05). For males, there were within-subject day-by-day differences after asymptotic transition, and all restrained males were delayed in reaching asymptotic performance. In contrast, stressed females were facilitated in appetitive and aversive-only instrumental learning but impaired during acquisition of the aversive transfer task. Males were faster than females in reaching the appetitive shaping criterion, but females were more efficient in reaching the appetitive tone-signaled criterion. Finally, an effect of task showed that while females reached aversive shaping criterion at a faster rate when they had prior appetitive learning, they were impaired in tone-signaled avoidance learning only when they had prior appetitive learning. These tasks reveal important nuances on the effect of stress and sex differences on goal-directed behavior.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别和慢性约束对大鼠器乐学习的影响。
长期的压力已被证明会影响学习,但关于性别或任务差异的研究很少或根本不存在。我们研究了性和慢性应激对成年大鼠工具学习的影响。大鼠在有或没有先前的食欲经验的厌恶范式中进行测试,并收集每日体重数据作为应激指标。与对照动物相比,应激期雄性和雌性动物的体重均保持下降(-7%,P≤0.05)和下降(-5%,P≤0.05)。对于男性,在渐近过渡后,受试者内存在逐日差异,并且所有受约束的男性在达到渐近表现时都延迟。相反,有压力的女性在食欲和厌恶的工具学习方面得到促进,但在厌恶迁移任务的习得过程中受到损害。男性比女性更快地达到食欲形状标准,但女性更有效地达到食欲音调信号标准。最后,任务效应表明,当女性具有先前的食欲学习时,她们达到厌恶塑造标准的速度更快,但只有当女性具有先前的食欲学习时,她们在声调信号回避学习方面受到损害。这些任务揭示了压力和性别差异对目标导向行为影响的重要细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stress-Coping Humoral Glycolipids Produced by Mice Given Controlled Bathing Treatments Predictors of Seizure Recurrence after Acute Symptomatic Seizures in Ischemic Stroke Patients. Impact of Tooth Loss and Other Risk Factors on Cognitive Impairment in Saudi Female Population Pathomechanisms of Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in ALS. Sequential Changes in Brain Glutamate and Adenosine A1 Receptors May Explain Severity of Adolescent Alcohol Withdrawal after Consumption of High Levels of Alcohol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1