Approaches to Information Sharing and Assessment: Evidence From a Demonstration Program.

Helen Chester, Jane Hughes, Paul Clarkson, Sue Davies, David Challis
{"title":"Approaches to Information Sharing and Assessment: Evidence From a Demonstration Program.","authors":"Helen Chester,&nbsp;Jane Hughes,&nbsp;Paul Clarkson,&nbsp;Sue Davies,&nbsp;David Challis","doi":"10.1891/1521-0987.16.3.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article categorizes and delineates approaches to information sharing and assessment in a demonstration program established by central government in England. Its purpose was to develop and test a set of principles relating to a general assessment framework for adults in demonstrator sites, maximizing the use of information technology where feasible. The method employed comprised the systematic analysis of documents associated with the funding application and a telephone interview with personnel in each site. Data were collected from 17 initiatives, 13 of which provided detailed information on information sharing within the assessment process. A taxonomy of approaches was produced and information sharing in the assessment process reported in terms of setting and personnel; approaches to data collection, storage, and transfer; and changes to the process. A classification of the initiatives within a demonstration program was a useful means of describing them. Measures of intermediate outcomes captured changes in information sharing between agencies. Local initiatives were successful in promoting electronic information sharing between health and social care agencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":80262,"journal":{"name":"Care management journals : Journal of case management ; The journal of long term home health care","volume":"16 3","pages":"150-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1891/1521-0987.16.3.150","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Care management journals : Journal of case management ; The journal of long term home health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/1521-0987.16.3.150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This article categorizes and delineates approaches to information sharing and assessment in a demonstration program established by central government in England. Its purpose was to develop and test a set of principles relating to a general assessment framework for adults in demonstrator sites, maximizing the use of information technology where feasible. The method employed comprised the systematic analysis of documents associated with the funding application and a telephone interview with personnel in each site. Data were collected from 17 initiatives, 13 of which provided detailed information on information sharing within the assessment process. A taxonomy of approaches was produced and information sharing in the assessment process reported in terms of setting and personnel; approaches to data collection, storage, and transfer; and changes to the process. A classification of the initiatives within a demonstration program was a useful means of describing them. Measures of intermediate outcomes captured changes in information sharing between agencies. Local initiatives were successful in promoting electronic information sharing between health and social care agencies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息共享与评估方法:来自示范项目的证据。
本文对英国中央政府建立的一个示范项目的信息共享和评估方法进行了分类和描述。其目的是制订和试验一套与示范场址成人一般评价框架有关的原则,在可行的情况下尽量利用信息技术。所采用的方法包括系统地分析与资金申请有关的文件,并与每个场址的工作人员进行电话面谈。从17项倡议收集了数据,其中13项提供了关于在评估过程中分享信息的详细资料。制定了一项方法分类,并在环境和人员方面报告了评估过程中的信息共享情况;数据收集、存储和传输的方法;以及过程的变化。在演示程序中对主动性工作进行分类是描述它们的一种有用的方法。对中间结果的衡量反映了机构间信息共享的变化。地方举措在促进保健和社会保健机构之间的电子信息共享方面取得了成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Directions for Care Management Journals. Comprehensive Care. A System Analysis of Delay in Outpatient Respiratory Equipment Delivery. An Integrated Case Management Model to Assist Pacific Youth Offenders and Their Families in Australia. Risk Factors and Effects of Care Management on Hospital Readmissions Among High Users at an Academic Medical Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1