Acoustic radiation force impulse induced strain elastography and point shear wave elastography for evaluation of thyroid nodules.

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL International journal of clinical and experimental medicine Pub Date : 2015-07-15 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01
Xian Huang, Le-Hang Guo, Hui-Xiong Xu, Xue-Hao Gong, Bo-Ji Liu, Jun-Mei Xu, Yi-Feng Zhang, Xiao-Long Li, Dan-Dan Li, Shen Qu, Lin Fang
{"title":"Acoustic radiation force impulse induced strain elastography and point shear wave elastography for evaluation of thyroid nodules.","authors":"Xian Huang,&nbsp;Le-Hang Guo,&nbsp;Hui-Xiong Xu,&nbsp;Xue-Hao Gong,&nbsp;Bo-Ji Liu,&nbsp;Jun-Mei Xu,&nbsp;Yi-Feng Zhang,&nbsp;Xiao-Long Li,&nbsp;Dan-Dan Li,&nbsp;Shen Qu,&nbsp;Lin Fang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) induced strain elastography (SE), point shear wave elastography (p-SWE), and their combined use in differentiating thyroid nodules. This retrospective study included 155 thyroid nodules (94 benign and 61 malignant) in 136 patients. Ultrasound, ARFI-induced SE and p-SWE were performed on each nodule. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of ARFI-induced SE, p-SWE and their combined use to distinguish benign from malignant thyroid nodules with histological results used as the reference standard. The areas under the ROC for ARFI-induced SE, p-SWE, and their combined use were 0.828, 0.829, and 0.840, respectively (both P > 0.05). The specificity of ARFI-induced SE was higher than that of p-SWE as well as their combined use (both P < 0.05). The combination of the two methods significantly improved the diagnostic sensitivity and NPV compared with either ARFI-induced SE or p-SWE alone (both P < 0.05). For nodules ≤ 10 mm, the combination of the two methods significantly improved the diagnostic sensitivity only. For nodules > 10 mm, there were no significant differences in sensitivity and NPV among the three methods in differentiating thyroid nodules (all P > 0.05). In conclusions, ARFI-induced SE and p-SWE are both valuable tools for detecting malignant thyroid nodules. The combined use of ARFI-induced SE and p-SWE improves the diagnostic sensitivity and NPV significantly whereas ARFI-induced SE alone achieves the highest specificity. </p>","PeriodicalId":13892,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565273/pdf/ijcem0008-10956.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) induced strain elastography (SE), point shear wave elastography (p-SWE), and their combined use in differentiating thyroid nodules. This retrospective study included 155 thyroid nodules (94 benign and 61 malignant) in 136 patients. Ultrasound, ARFI-induced SE and p-SWE were performed on each nodule. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of ARFI-induced SE, p-SWE and their combined use to distinguish benign from malignant thyroid nodules with histological results used as the reference standard. The areas under the ROC for ARFI-induced SE, p-SWE, and their combined use were 0.828, 0.829, and 0.840, respectively (both P > 0.05). The specificity of ARFI-induced SE was higher than that of p-SWE as well as their combined use (both P < 0.05). The combination of the two methods significantly improved the diagnostic sensitivity and NPV compared with either ARFI-induced SE or p-SWE alone (both P < 0.05). For nodules ≤ 10 mm, the combination of the two methods significantly improved the diagnostic sensitivity only. For nodules > 10 mm, there were no significant differences in sensitivity and NPV among the three methods in differentiating thyroid nodules (all P > 0.05). In conclusions, ARFI-induced SE and p-SWE are both valuable tools for detecting malignant thyroid nodules. The combined use of ARFI-induced SE and p-SWE improves the diagnostic sensitivity and NPV significantly whereas ARFI-induced SE alone achieves the highest specificity.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
声辐射力脉冲应变弹性成像和点剪切波弹性成像评价甲状腺结节。
本研究的目的是评估声辐射力脉冲(ARFI)诱导应变弹性成像(SE)、点剪切波弹性成像(p-SWE)的诊断性能,以及它们在甲状腺结节鉴别中的联合应用。本回顾性研究包括136例患者的155个甲状腺结节(94个良性,61个恶性)。超声、arfi诱导的SE和p-SWE对每个结节进行检查。采用受试者工作特征曲线(Receiver operating characteristic curve, ROC)分析arfi诱导的SE、p-SWE及其联合应用对甲状腺结节良恶性的诊断效果,并以组织学结果作为参考标准。arfi诱导的SE、P - swe及其联合应用的ROC下面积分别为0.828、0.829、0.840 (P > 0.05)。arfi诱导SE的特异性高于P - swe及其联合使用(P < 0.05)。与arfi诱导的SE或单独P - swe相比,两种方法联合使用可显著提高诊断敏感性和NPV (P < 0.05)。对于≤10 mm的结节,两种方法联合使用仅显著提高了诊断敏感性。对于> 10 mm的结节,3种方法鉴别甲状腺结节的敏感性和NPV差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。总之,arfi诱导的SE和p-SWE都是检测恶性甲状腺结节的有价值的工具。arfi诱导的SE和p-SWE联合使用可显著提高诊断敏感性和NPV,而arfi诱导的SE单独使用可达到最高的特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A case report of moderate COVID-19 with an extremely long-term viral shedding period in China Lentivirus-Mediated knockdown of tectonic family member 1 inhibits medulloblastoma cell proliferation [Retraction]. Classification of MRI and psychological testing data based on support vector machine. Nucleostemin regulates proliferation and migration of gastric cancer and correlates with its malignancy [Retraction]. Effect of lipiodol and methylene blue on the thoracoscopic preoperative positioning [Retraction].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1