Sensitivity and Specificity of a Nurse Dysphagia Screen in Stroke Patients.

Jo Cummings, Donovan Soomans, Jennifer O'Laughlin, Valerie Snapp, Amy Jodoin, Heather Proco, Mindy Archer, Donna Rood
{"title":"Sensitivity and Specificity of a Nurse Dysphagia Screen in Stroke Patients.","authors":"Jo Cummings,&nbsp;Donovan Soomans,&nbsp;Jennifer O'Laughlin,&nbsp;Valerie Snapp,&nbsp;Amy Jodoin,&nbsp;Heather Proco,&nbsp;Mindy Archer,&nbsp;Donna Rood","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine how well an institutionally developed nurse dysphagia screening tool correctly identified the presence (sensitivity) or absence (specificity) of dysphagia in patients following acute stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A method-comparison design was used to compare results of the Nurse Dysphagia Screen to the dysphagia evaluation by a speech and language pathologist (SLP). Each newly diagnosed participant served as his or her control, with both dysphagia evaluations (nurse, SLP) occurring within 2 hours of each other. Sensitivity and specificity of the Nurse Dysphagia Screen was calculated using standard formulas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 49 patients evaluated following stroke, average age was 71.7 (SD +/- 13.5). Twenty-five subjects were female and 24 were male. The majority of the participants had strokes identified as ischemic in origin (n=35). The SLP found 18 (37%) participants had a positive dysphagia assessment. The Nurse Dysphagia Screen was positive in 16 of 18 participants screened positive by SLP, resulting in some type of dietary restriction. The Nurse Dysphagia Screen was negative in 28 of the 31 patients screened as negative by SLP. Sensitivity and specificity of the Nurse Dysphagia Screen were 89% and 90%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An easy-to-use, institutionally developed nurse dysphagia screening tool successfully identified patients with swallowing difficulties after stroke later diagnosed by SLP.</p>","PeriodicalId":18507,"journal":{"name":"Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses","volume":"24 4","pages":"219-22, 263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine how well an institutionally developed nurse dysphagia screening tool correctly identified the presence (sensitivity) or absence (specificity) of dysphagia in patients following acute stroke.

Methods: A method-comparison design was used to compare results of the Nurse Dysphagia Screen to the dysphagia evaluation by a speech and language pathologist (SLP). Each newly diagnosed participant served as his or her control, with both dysphagia evaluations (nurse, SLP) occurring within 2 hours of each other. Sensitivity and specificity of the Nurse Dysphagia Screen was calculated using standard formulas.

Results: For 49 patients evaluated following stroke, average age was 71.7 (SD +/- 13.5). Twenty-five subjects were female and 24 were male. The majority of the participants had strokes identified as ischemic in origin (n=35). The SLP found 18 (37%) participants had a positive dysphagia assessment. The Nurse Dysphagia Screen was positive in 16 of 18 participants screened positive by SLP, resulting in some type of dietary restriction. The Nurse Dysphagia Screen was negative in 28 of the 31 patients screened as negative by SLP. Sensitivity and specificity of the Nurse Dysphagia Screen were 89% and 90%, respectively.

Conclusions: An easy-to-use, institutionally developed nurse dysphagia screening tool successfully identified patients with swallowing difficulties after stroke later diagnosed by SLP.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士对脑卒中患者吞咽困难筛查的敏感性和特异性。
目的:确定机构开发的护士吞咽困难筛查工具正确识别急性卒中患者吞咽困难的存在(敏感性)或不存在(特异性)的程度。方法:采用方法比较设计,将护士吞咽困难筛查结果与语言病理学家(SLP)的吞咽困难评估结果进行比较。每个新诊断的参与者作为他或她的对照组,两次吞咽困难评估(护士,SLP)在彼此2小时内发生。使用标准公式计算护士吞咽困难筛查的敏感性和特异性。结果:卒中后评估的49例患者,平均年龄为71.7岁(SD +/- 13.5)。25名受试者为女性,24名为男性。大多数参与者被确定为缺血性中风(n=35)。SLP发现18名(37%)参与者有积极的吞咽困难评估。护士吞咽困难筛查在SLP筛查阳性的18名参与者中有16名呈阳性,导致某种类型的饮食限制。护士吞咽困难筛查31例患者中有28例经SLP筛查为阴性。护士吞咽困难筛查的敏感性和特异性分别为89%和90%。结论:一种易于使用,机构开发的护士吞咽困难筛查工具成功地识别出中风后吞咽困难的患者,这些患者后来被SLP诊断为吞咽困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: MEDSURG Nursing, The Journal of Adult Health, is the official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses (AMSN). The journal provides its readers with the multidisciplinary information they need to provide clinically excellent patient care and to enhance their nursing practice. MEDSURG Nursing supports adult health/medical-surgical nurses as they strive for excellence in patient care, private practice, and outpatient health care settings in urban, suburban, and rural locations. Each peer-reviewed issue of MEDSURG Nursing features a comprehensive discussion and description of today"s clinical issues in adult health/medical-surgical nursing.
期刊最新文献
Delirium Screening of Patients on a Neuroscience Step-Down Unit. Using a Behavioral Response Team on Non-Psychiatric Nursing Units. Calming the Agitated Patient: Providing Strategies to Support Clinicians. Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) A Systematic Review of Care Needs for Surgical Patients with Chronic Opioid Use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1