Feasibility of 3-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery (3D-VATS) for pulmonary resection.

Annals of surgical innovation and research Pub Date : 2015-10-15 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13022-015-0018-x
Chris Dickhoff, Wilson W Li, Petr Symersky, Koen J Hartemink
{"title":"Feasibility of 3-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery (3D-VATS) for pulmonary resection.","authors":"Chris Dickhoff,&nbsp;Wilson W Li,&nbsp;Petr Symersky,&nbsp;Koen J Hartemink","doi":"10.1186/s13022-015-0018-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery (2D-VATS) has gained its position in daily practise. Although very useful, its two-dimensional view has its drawbacks when performing pulmonary resections. We report our first experience with 3-dimensional video-assisted surgery (3D-VATS). Advantages and differences with 2D-VATS and robotic surgery (RS) are discussed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate feasibility, we scheduled patients for surgery by 3D-VATS who would normally be treated with 2D-VATS. The main difference of the equipment in 3D-VATS compared with former VATS equipment, is the flexible camera-tip (100-degrees) and the necessary 3D-glasses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four patients were successfully operated for anatomic pulmonary resections. On-the-structure dissection was easily performed and with the flexible camera-tip, a perfect view can be obtained, with clear visualisation of important (hilar) structures. These features highly facilitate the surgeon in tissue preparation and recognition of the dissection planes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our opinion, 3D-VATS is superior to 2D-VATS for performing anatomic pulmonary resection and we expect an improvement in terms of operation time and learning curve. Furthermore, it is a valuable alternative for RS at lower costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":87428,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgical innovation and research","volume":"9 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13022-015-0018-x","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgical innovation and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13022-015-0018-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Two-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery (2D-VATS) has gained its position in daily practise. Although very useful, its two-dimensional view has its drawbacks when performing pulmonary resections. We report our first experience with 3-dimensional video-assisted surgery (3D-VATS). Advantages and differences with 2D-VATS and robotic surgery (RS) are discussed.

Methods: To evaluate feasibility, we scheduled patients for surgery by 3D-VATS who would normally be treated with 2D-VATS. The main difference of the equipment in 3D-VATS compared with former VATS equipment, is the flexible camera-tip (100-degrees) and the necessary 3D-glasses.

Results: Four patients were successfully operated for anatomic pulmonary resections. On-the-structure dissection was easily performed and with the flexible camera-tip, a perfect view can be obtained, with clear visualisation of important (hilar) structures. These features highly facilitate the surgeon in tissue preparation and recognition of the dissection planes.

Conclusion: In our opinion, 3D-VATS is superior to 2D-VATS for performing anatomic pulmonary resection and we expect an improvement in terms of operation time and learning curve. Furthermore, it is a valuable alternative for RS at lower costs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三维视频辅助胸外科(3D-VATS)用于肺切除术的可行性。
背景:二维视频辅助胸外科(2D-VATS)已在日常实践中获得了地位。虽然它非常有用,但在进行肺切除术时,它的二维视图有其缺点。我们报告了我们第一次三维视频辅助手术(3D-VATS)的经验。讨论了2D-VATS和机器人手术(RS)的优点和区别。方法:为了评估可行性,我们安排了通常使用3D-VATS治疗的患者进行3D-VATS手术。与以前的VATS设备相比,3D-VATS设备的主要区别在于柔性相机尖端(100度)和必要的3d眼镜。结果:4例患者均成功行解剖性肺切除术。结构上的解剖很容易进行,并且使用灵活的相机尖端,可以获得完美的视图,清晰地显示重要的(肺门)结构。这些特征极大地方便了外科医生在组织准备和识别解剖平面。结论:我们认为3D-VATS在解剖性肺切除术中优于2D-VATS,并期望在手术时间和学习曲线上有所改善。此外,它以较低的成本是RS的一种有价值的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel treatments for complications after bariatric surgery Assessment of central venous catheterization in a simulated model using a motion-tracking device: an experimental validation study Current Outcomes of Laparoscopic Duodenal Switch Benefits of intraoperative endoscopy: case report and review of 300 sleeves gastrectomies Development of automated postoperative enteral nutrition: restricting feeding site inflow to match peristaltic outflow
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1