In Vivo Quantification of 5-HT2A Brain Receptors in Mdr1a KO Rats with 123I-R91150 Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Molecular Imaging Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.2310/7290.2015.00006
Noé Dumas, Marcelle Moulin-Sallanon, Pascal Fender, Benjamin B Tournier, Nathalie Ginovart, Yves Charnay, Philippe Millet
{"title":"In Vivo Quantification of 5-HT2A Brain Receptors in Mdr1a KO Rats with 123I-R91150 Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography.","authors":"Noé Dumas,&nbsp;Marcelle Moulin-Sallanon,&nbsp;Pascal Fender,&nbsp;Benjamin B Tournier,&nbsp;Nathalie Ginovart,&nbsp;Yves Charnay,&nbsp;Philippe Millet","doi":"10.2310/7290.2015.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our goal was to identify suitable image quantification methods to image 5-hydroxytryptamine2A (5-HT2A) receptors in vivo in Mdr1a knockout (KO) rats (i.e., P-glycoprotein KO) using 123I-R91150 single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The 123I-R91150 binding parameters estimated with different reference tissue models (simplified reference tissue model [SRTM], Logan reference tissue model, and tissue ratio [TR] method) were compared to the estimates obtained with a comprehensive three-tissue/seven-parameter (3T/7k)-based model. The SRTM and Logan reference tissue model estimates of 5-HT2A receptor (5-HT2AR) nondisplaceable binding potential (BPND) correlated well with the absolute receptor density measured with the 3T/7k gold standard (r > .89). Quantification of 5-HT2AR using the Logan reference tissue model required at least 90 minutes of scanning, whereas the SRTM required at least 110 minutes. The TR method estimates were also highly correlated to the 5-HT2AR density (r > .91) and only required a single 20-minute scan between 100 and 120 minutes postinjection. However, a systematic overestimation of the BPND values was observed. The Logan reference tissue method is more convenient than the SRTM for the quantification of 5-HT2AR in Mdr1a KO rats using 123I-R91150 SPECT. The TR method is an interesting and simple alternative, despite its bias, as it still provides a valid index of 5-HT2AR density.</p>","PeriodicalId":18855,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Imaging","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2310/7290.2015.00006","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2015.00006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Our goal was to identify suitable image quantification methods to image 5-hydroxytryptamine2A (5-HT2A) receptors in vivo in Mdr1a knockout (KO) rats (i.e., P-glycoprotein KO) using 123I-R91150 single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The 123I-R91150 binding parameters estimated with different reference tissue models (simplified reference tissue model [SRTM], Logan reference tissue model, and tissue ratio [TR] method) were compared to the estimates obtained with a comprehensive three-tissue/seven-parameter (3T/7k)-based model. The SRTM and Logan reference tissue model estimates of 5-HT2A receptor (5-HT2AR) nondisplaceable binding potential (BPND) correlated well with the absolute receptor density measured with the 3T/7k gold standard (r > .89). Quantification of 5-HT2AR using the Logan reference tissue model required at least 90 minutes of scanning, whereas the SRTM required at least 110 minutes. The TR method estimates were also highly correlated to the 5-HT2AR density (r > .91) and only required a single 20-minute scan between 100 and 120 minutes postinjection. However, a systematic overestimation of the BPND values was observed. The Logan reference tissue method is more convenient than the SRTM for the quantification of 5-HT2AR in Mdr1a KO rats using 123I-R91150 SPECT. The TR method is an interesting and simple alternative, despite its bias, as it still provides a valid index of 5-HT2AR density.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
123I-R91150单光子发射计算机断层扫描在体内定量Mdr1a KO大鼠5-HT2A脑受体
我们的目标是确定合适的图像量化方法,使用123I-R91150单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)对Mdr1a敲除(KO)大鼠(即p -糖蛋白KO)体内5-羟色胺2a (5-HT2A)受体进行成像。将不同参考组织模型(简化参考组织模型[SRTM]、Logan参考组织模型和组织比率[TR]法)估计的123I-R91150结合参数与基于三组织/七参数(3T/7k)的综合模型估计的123I-R91150结合参数进行比较。SRTM和Logan参考组织模型估计的5-HT2A受体(5-HT2AR)不可置换结合电位(BPND)与3T/7k金标准测量的绝对受体密度具有良好的相关性(r > 0.89)。使用Logan参考组织模型定量5-HT2AR至少需要90分钟的扫描时间,而SRTM至少需要110分钟。TR方法的估计也与5-HT2AR密度高度相关(r > .91),并且只需要在注射后100到120分钟之间进行一次20分钟的扫描。然而,观察到对BPND值的系统性高估。使用123I-R91150 SPECT定量Mdr1a KO大鼠5-HT2AR时,Logan参考组织法比SRTM更方便。TR方法是一种有趣而简单的替代方法,尽管它存在偏差,因为它仍然提供了5-HT2AR密度的有效指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Imaging
Molecular Imaging Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
自引率
3.60%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Molecular Imaging is a peer-reviewed, open access journal highlighting the breadth of molecular imaging research from basic science to preclinical studies to human applications. This serves both the scientific and clinical communities by disseminating novel results and concepts relevant to the biological study of normal and disease processes in both basic and translational studies ranging from mice to humans.
期刊最新文献
In Situ Mapping of the Glucose Metabolism Heterogeneity in Atherosclerosis: Correlation With 2-Deoxyglucose Uptake. Comparison of Tumor Non-specific and PD-L1 Specific Imaging by Near-Infrared Fluorescence/Cerenkov Luminescence Dual-Modality In-situ Imaging. Study on the Relationship Between MRI Functional Imaging and Multiple Immunohistochemical Features of Glioma: A Noninvasive and More Precise Glioma Management. PET/CT in the Evaluation of CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy in Hematological Malignancies. Combining Nuclear Medicine With Other Modalities: Future Prospect for Multimodality Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1