Dorota Studzińska, Barbara Gryglewska, Maria Wojnarowska, Joanna Paleń, Bogusław Rudel, Tomasz Grodzicki
{"title":"[Cardio-vascular risk factors control in elderly patients with peripheral artery disease].","authors":"Dorota Studzińska, Barbara Gryglewska, Maria Wojnarowska, Joanna Paleń, Bogusław Rudel, Tomasz Grodzicki","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The assessment of control of modifiable risk factors among elderly patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) admitted to the hospital angiology ward.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The results of treatment of dyslipidemia (DL), hypertension (HT), diabetes mellitus (DM) and prevalence of cigarette smoking were assessed among older (>65 years old, group I) and younger patients (group II) with PAD in a admission day to hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 154 patients (I--92 and II--65 subjects) aged 67.4 ± 9.4 years, 69.5% men. The study groups presented similar grades of PAD classification by Rutherford. Group I was older (73.5 ± 6.4 vs 58.3 ± 4.7 yrs, p < 0.001), had lower frequency of current smokers (21.7 vs 48.4%, P < 0.001) than group II. Diagnosis of DL, HT and DM were equally frequent in both groups. However, coronary heart disease was diagnosed more frequently in group I than II (52.2 vs 29.0%, p = 0.004). Both groups were similar according to systolic blood pressure (BP) values and levels of glucose and HDL cholesterol. Group I had lower diastolic BP than group II (69.5 ± 11.1 vs 74.0 ± 9.9 mmHg, p = 0.02), but control of HT was similar in both groups (71.7 vs 67.7%). LDL cholesterol levels were lower in a group I than II (2.2 ± 1.0 vs 2.5 ± 1.1 mmol/l, p = 0.04), but LDL cholesterol values < 1.8 mmol/l were observed with similar frequency in both groups (40.2 vs 27.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient's age seems to have no important impact on the control of atherosclerosis risk factors in patients with PAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21148,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad lekarski","volume":"73 4","pages":"224-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The assessment of control of modifiable risk factors among elderly patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) admitted to the hospital angiology ward.
Methods: The results of treatment of dyslipidemia (DL), hypertension (HT), diabetes mellitus (DM) and prevalence of cigarette smoking were assessed among older (>65 years old, group I) and younger patients (group II) with PAD in a admission day to hospital.
Results: The study population included 154 patients (I--92 and II--65 subjects) aged 67.4 ± 9.4 years, 69.5% men. The study groups presented similar grades of PAD classification by Rutherford. Group I was older (73.5 ± 6.4 vs 58.3 ± 4.7 yrs, p < 0.001), had lower frequency of current smokers (21.7 vs 48.4%, P < 0.001) than group II. Diagnosis of DL, HT and DM were equally frequent in both groups. However, coronary heart disease was diagnosed more frequently in group I than II (52.2 vs 29.0%, p = 0.004). Both groups were similar according to systolic blood pressure (BP) values and levels of glucose and HDL cholesterol. Group I had lower diastolic BP than group II (69.5 ± 11.1 vs 74.0 ± 9.9 mmHg, p = 0.02), but control of HT was similar in both groups (71.7 vs 67.7%). LDL cholesterol levels were lower in a group I than II (2.2 ± 1.0 vs 2.5 ± 1.1 mmol/l, p = 0.04), but LDL cholesterol values < 1.8 mmol/l were observed with similar frequency in both groups (40.2 vs 27.4%).
Conclusions: Patient's age seems to have no important impact on the control of atherosclerosis risk factors in patients with PAD.
目的:评价老年外周动脉疾病(PAD)住院患者可改变危险因素的控制情况。方法:对老年(>65岁)和年轻(II组)PAD患者在入院当日的血脂异常(DL)、高血压(HT)、糖尿病(DM)及吸烟情况进行分析。结果:研究人群包括154例患者(I- 92例和II- 65例),年龄67.4±9.4岁,69.5%为男性。卢瑟福对两组PAD的分级相似。I组患者年龄较大(73.5±6.4岁vs 58.3±4.7岁,p < 0.001),吸烟频率较II组低(21.7 vs 48.4%, p < 0.001)。两组中DL、HT和DM的诊断频率相同。然而,I组的冠心病诊断率高于II组(52.2% vs 29.0%, p = 0.004)。根据收缩压(BP)值以及葡萄糖和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平,两组相似。I组舒张压低于II组(69.5±11.1 vs 74.0±9.9 mmHg, p = 0.02),但两组HT的对照相似(71.7 vs 67.7%)。I组LDL胆固醇水平低于II组(2.2±1.0 vs 2.5±1.1 mmol/l, p = 0.04),但LDL胆固醇< 1.8 mmol/l在两组中出现的频率相似(40.2 vs 27.4%)。结论:患者年龄对PAD患者动脉粥样硬化危险因素的控制似乎没有重要影响。