Valoración de la satisfacción materna con la analgesia epidural para el control del dolor del trabajo de parto

V. Marenco-Arellano , L. Ferreira , E. Ramalle-Gómara , A. Crespo , A. Rupérez , E. Fraile
{"title":"Valoración de la satisfacción materna con la analgesia epidural para el control del dolor del trabajo de parto","authors":"V. Marenco-Arellano ,&nbsp;L. Ferreira ,&nbsp;E. Ramalle-Gómara ,&nbsp;A. Crespo ,&nbsp;A. Rupérez ,&nbsp;E. Fraile","doi":"10.1016/j.cali.2016.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To determine the level of satisfaction and the sociodemographic characteristics of patients who receive epidural analgesia during labour.</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>A SERVQHOS questionnaire administered, with consecutive sampling, to 140 patients who had received an epidural anaesthetic for pain control during labour between January and June 2014, at the Hospital San Pedro.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 140 questionnaires were completed. The mean overall satisfaction (SERVQHOS scale) was 4.4 with standard deviation (SD):<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.9, with the best results being obtained in the subjective ítems: (4.3; SD 0.81) compared to the objective ítems (4; SD: 0.9). The large majority (84.3%) showed satisfaction with the epidural anaesthetic, and 100% would ask for it again.</p><p>No significant differences were found in epidural satisfaction or pain perception related to socioeconomic variables (age, nationality, employment conditions, education level or marital status).</p><p>As regards nationality, 119 (85%) were Spanish, and 14.3% (20) of other nationalities, with 1 patient not answering the nationality question. As regards marital status, 79.3% (111) were married, 1.4% (2), single, and 2.9% (4) were widows or separated, and 2.9% (4) did not answer. The mean age was 33.3 years (SD: 4.4).</p><p>Prior to the administration of the epidural anaesthetic 93.2% of the Spanish citizens group described the pain as severe compared to 95% of the other nationalities group, but this difference had no statistical significance (p=.279).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The level of satisfaction reported by the patients with this technique was high, with subjective items (good manners and trust) being appreciated more.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101101,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","volume":"32 3","pages":"Pages 166-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2016.05.006","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X1630104X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

To determine the level of satisfaction and the sociodemographic characteristics of patients who receive epidural analgesia during labour.

Material and Methods

A SERVQHOS questionnaire administered, with consecutive sampling, to 140 patients who had received an epidural anaesthetic for pain control during labour between January and June 2014, at the Hospital San Pedro.

Results

A total of 140 questionnaires were completed. The mean overall satisfaction (SERVQHOS scale) was 4.4 with standard deviation (SD): ± 0.9, with the best results being obtained in the subjective ítems: (4.3; SD 0.81) compared to the objective ítems (4; SD: 0.9). The large majority (84.3%) showed satisfaction with the epidural anaesthetic, and 100% would ask for it again.

No significant differences were found in epidural satisfaction or pain perception related to socioeconomic variables (age, nationality, employment conditions, education level or marital status).

As regards nationality, 119 (85%) were Spanish, and 14.3% (20) of other nationalities, with 1 patient not answering the nationality question. As regards marital status, 79.3% (111) were married, 1.4% (2), single, and 2.9% (4) were widows or separated, and 2.9% (4) did not answer. The mean age was 33.3 years (SD: 4.4).

Prior to the administration of the epidural anaesthetic 93.2% of the Spanish citizens group described the pain as severe compared to 95% of the other nationalities group, but this difference had no statistical significance (p=.279).

Conclusion

The level of satisfaction reported by the patients with this technique was high, with subjective items (good manners and trust) being appreciated more.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对产妇硬膜外镇痛控制分娩疼痛满意度的评价
背景:了解分娩过程中接受硬膜外镇痛的患者的满意度和社会人口学特征。材料和方法对2014年1月至6月在圣佩德罗医院接受硬膜外麻醉以控制分娩疼痛的140名患者进行了SERVQHOS问卷调查,并进行了连续抽样。结果共完成问卷140份。总体满意度(SERVQHOS量表)均值为4.4,标准差(SD):±0.9,主观满意度得分最高ítems:(4.3;SD 0.81)与客观ítems (4;SD: 0.9)。绝大多数患者(84.3%)对硬膜外麻醉满意,100%的患者会再次要求硬膜外麻醉。与社会经济变量(年龄、国籍、就业状况、教育水平或婚姻状况)相关的硬膜外满意度或疼痛感知无显著差异。国籍方面,西班牙119例(85%),其他国籍14.3%(20),1例患者未回答国籍问题。婚姻状况方面,79.3%(111人)已婚,1.4%(2人)单身,2.9%(4人)丧偶或分居,2.9%(4人)没有回答。平均年龄33.3岁(SD: 4.4)。在使用硬膜外麻醉之前,93.2%的西班牙公民组描述疼痛严重,而其他国籍组的这一比例为95%,但这一差异没有统计学意义(p= 0.279)。结论患者对该技术的满意度较高,主观项目(礼貌、信任)满意度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Del papel a las nuevas tecnologías en la comunicación con nuestros pacientes Impacto de un programa de gestión de riesgo en la tasa de úlceras por presión La enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC): ¿esa gran conocida? Reflexiones sobre cómo mejorar la calidad diagnóstica El capital social como determinante de salud pública Efectividad de la evaluación de historias clínicas informatizadas en un hospital universitario
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1