Coronal imbalance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: Prevalence and influence on surgical decision-making for spinal osteotomy.

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Journal Pub Date : 2016-09-01 DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.98B9.37273
H Bao, P Yan, Y Qiu, Z Liu, F Zhu
{"title":"Coronal imbalance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: Prevalence and influence on surgical decision-making for spinal osteotomy.","authors":"H Bao,&nbsp;P Yan,&nbsp;Y Qiu,&nbsp;Z Liu,&nbsp;F Zhu","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.98B9.37273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>There is a paucity of information on the pre-operative coronal imbalance in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and its influence on surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 284 DLS patients were recruited into this study, among whom 69 patients were treated surgically and the remaining 215 patients conservatively Patients were classified based on the coronal balance distance (CBD): Type A, CBD < 3 cm; Type B, CBD > 3 cm and C7 Plumb Line (C7PL) shifted to the concave side of the curve; Type C, CBD > 3 cm and C7PL shifted to the convex side.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 99 of the 284 (34.8%) patient presented with a pre-operative coronal imbalance (mean CBD: 48.5, standard deviation 18.7 mm). More patients with a Type B malalignment were observed than with a Type C malalignment (62 versus 37). A total of 21 pf the 69 (30.4%) surgically treated patients had a post-operative coronal imbalance, which was found to be more prevalent in Type C patients (p < 0.001). At follow-up, less improvement was observed in terms of Short Form-36 Physical Component Score and visual analogue score for back pain (p = 0.034 and 0.025, respectively) in Type C patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that patients with Type C coronal malalignment may be at greater risk of post-operative coronal imbalance following posterior osteotomy. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1227-33.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"98-B 9","pages":"1227-33"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1302/0301-620X.98B9.37273","citationCount":"78","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B9.37273","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 78

Abstract

Aims: There is a paucity of information on the pre-operative coronal imbalance in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and its influence on surgical outcomes.

Patients and methods: A total of 284 DLS patients were recruited into this study, among whom 69 patients were treated surgically and the remaining 215 patients conservatively Patients were classified based on the coronal balance distance (CBD): Type A, CBD < 3 cm; Type B, CBD > 3 cm and C7 Plumb Line (C7PL) shifted to the concave side of the curve; Type C, CBD > 3 cm and C7PL shifted to the convex side.

Results: A total of 99 of the 284 (34.8%) patient presented with a pre-operative coronal imbalance (mean CBD: 48.5, standard deviation 18.7 mm). More patients with a Type B malalignment were observed than with a Type C malalignment (62 versus 37). A total of 21 pf the 69 (30.4%) surgically treated patients had a post-operative coronal imbalance, which was found to be more prevalent in Type C patients (p < 0.001). At follow-up, less improvement was observed in terms of Short Form-36 Physical Component Score and visual analogue score for back pain (p = 0.034 and 0.025, respectively) in Type C patients.

Conclusion: This study shows that patients with Type C coronal malalignment may be at greater risk of post-operative coronal imbalance following posterior osteotomy. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1227-33.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退行性腰椎侧凸的冠状不平衡:患病率及对脊柱截骨手术决策的影响。
目的:关于退行性腰椎侧凸(DLS)患者术前冠状动脉失衡及其对手术结果的影响的信息缺乏。患者和方法:本研究共招募284例DLS患者,其中手术治疗69例,保守治疗215例。根据冠状平衡距离(CBD)分为:A型,CBD < 3 cm;B型,CBD > 3cm, C7铅垂线(C7PL)向曲线凹侧偏移;C型,CBD > 3cm, C7PL向凸侧移位。结果:284例患者中有99例(34.8%)出现术前冠状动脉失衡(平均CBD: 48.5,标准差18.7 mm)。B型排列失调患者多于C型排列失调患者(62对37)。69例手术患者中有21例(30.4%)出现术后冠状动脉失衡,其中C型患者更为普遍(p < 0.001)。在随访中,C型患者在Short -36物理成分评分和视觉模拟评分方面的改善较少(p分别= 0.034和0.025)。结论:本研究表明,C型冠状位不对准患者在后路截骨术后冠状位不平衡的风险更大。本文引用本文:骨关节[J]; 2016; 38(2):1227- 1233。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Erratum. Comparison of functional outcome and revision-free survivorship of proximal femoral megaprosthesis in paediatric patients with open versus closed triradiate physes. Cost-effectiveness of early surgical fixation versus cast immobilization for adults with a scaphoid waist fracture: five-year follow-up of the Scaphoid Waist Internal Fixation for Fractures Trial. Current approaches to diagnosing and managing anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature patients. Early outcomes of the TARIC mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1