Making Sense of Bereavement in People with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities: Carer Perspectives.

Hannah Young, James Hogg, Brenda Garrard
{"title":"Making Sense of Bereavement in People with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities: Carer Perspectives.","authors":"Hannah Young,&nbsp;James Hogg,&nbsp;Brenda Garrard","doi":"10.1111/jar.12285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with intellectual disabilities are thought to have a reduced capacity for understanding death. Drawing on cognitive theory, researchers have suggested that those with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities mainly perceive loss as a mismatch between past and present experiences. However, very little research has considered how carers conceptualize bereavement in relation to this group.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews obtained responses from seven carers. Transcripts were examined using interpretative phenomenological analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two superordinate themes emerged: 'difficulty articulating the experience of loss' and 'making sense of bereavement through familiar patterns'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Carers conceptualize bereavement primarily in cognitive terms, but also take account of relational factors mediating loss. Implications for training and further research are outlined.</p>","PeriodicalId":73610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","volume":"30 6","pages":"1035-1044"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jar.12285","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: People with intellectual disabilities are thought to have a reduced capacity for understanding death. Drawing on cognitive theory, researchers have suggested that those with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities mainly perceive loss as a mismatch between past and present experiences. However, very little research has considered how carers conceptualize bereavement in relation to this group.

Method: Semi-structured interviews obtained responses from seven carers. Transcripts were examined using interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Results: Two superordinate themes emerged: 'difficulty articulating the experience of loss' and 'making sense of bereavement through familiar patterns'.

Conclusions: Carers conceptualize bereavement primarily in cognitive terms, but also take account of relational factors mediating loss. Implications for training and further research are outlined.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深刻的智力和多重残疾人士的丧亲之痛:照顾者的观点。
背景:智障人士被认为对死亡的理解能力较弱。根据认知理论,研究人员认为,那些有严重智力残疾和多重残疾的人主要把失去看作是过去和现在经历的不匹配。然而,很少有研究考虑到护理人员如何将丧亲之痛与这一群体联系起来。方法:采用半结构化访谈法,对7名护理人员进行问卷调查。使用解释性现象学分析检查转录本。结果:两个最重要的主题出现了:“难以表达失去的经历”和“通过熟悉的模式理解丧亲之痛”。结论:照护者主要从认知角度对丧亲进行概念化,但也考虑到影响丧亲的关系因素。概述了对培训和进一步研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Burnout Among Staff Working in Services for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Outcomes of a Creative Ability-Based Intervention: Advancing Independence in Learners With Severe Intellectual Disability. Childhood and Adulthood Predictors of Community Participation by Autistic Adults With and Without Intellectual Disability. Proxy-report in individuals with intellectual disability: A scoping review. Video-blogs and linguistic simplification for students with intellectual disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1