Maternity patients' access to their electronic medical records: use and perspectives of a patient portal.

Megan Megan Forster, Kerrie Dennison, Joanne Callen, Andrew Andrew, Johanna I Westbrook
{"title":"Maternity patients' access to their electronic medical records: use and perspectives of a patient portal.","authors":"Megan Megan Forster,&nbsp;Kerrie Dennison,&nbsp;Joanne Callen,&nbsp;Andrew Andrew,&nbsp;Johanna I Westbrook","doi":"10.1177/183335831504400101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients have been able to access clinical information from their paper-based health records for a number of years. With the advent of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) access to this information can now be achieved online using a secure electronic patient portal. The purpose of this study was to investigate maternity patients' use and perceptions of a patient portal developed at the Mater Mothers' Hospital in Brisbane, Australia. A web-based patient portal, one of the first developed and deployed in Australia, was introduced on 26 June 2012. The portal was designed for maternity patients booked at Mater Mothers' Hospital, as an alternative to the paper-based Pregnancy Health Record. Through the portal, maternity patients are able to complete their hospital registration form online and obtain current health information about their pregnancy (via their EMR), as well as access a variety of support tools to use during their pregnancy such as tailored public health advice. A retrospective cross-sectional study design was employed. Usage statistics were extracted from the system for a one year period (1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013). Patients' perceptions of the portal were obtained using an online survey, accessible by maternity patients for two weeks in February 2013 (n=80). Descriptive statistics were employed to analyse the data. Between July 2012 and June 2013, 10,892 maternity patients were offered a patient portal account and access to their EMR. Of those 6,518 created one (60%; 6,518/10,892) and 3,104 went on to request access to their EMR (48%; 3,104/6,518). Of these, 1,751 had their access application granted by 30 June 2013. The majority of maternity patients submitted registration forms online via the patient portal (56.7%). Patients could view their EMR multiple times: there were 671 views of the EMR, 2,781 views of appointment schedules and 135 birth preferences submitted via the EMR. Eighty survey responses were received from EMR account holders, (response rate of 8.1%; 80/985). The majority of respondents indicated they would use the portal and access their EMR for future pregnancies (86.2%; 69/80). Approximately half looked at their EMR after a visit with their care provider (51.3%); 41/80) and 37.5% (30/80) viewed their EMR before, to prepare for their visit. The majority (65.8%) thought that the EMR improved their ability to understand and recall appointments and almost half (48.1%) thought that with the EMR they were less likely to repeat pregnancy information to caregivers. This study provides the first Australian evidence of a patient portal system, tied to an EMR, working effectively in a maternity care context. It provides new evidence that portals can deliver benefits to maternity patients in terms of providing quick and easy access to current personal and general health information and support patients in their ability to recall and prepare for appointments. </p>","PeriodicalId":73210,"journal":{"name":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","volume":"44 1","pages":"4-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/183335831504400101","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/183335831504400101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Patients have been able to access clinical information from their paper-based health records for a number of years. With the advent of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) access to this information can now be achieved online using a secure electronic patient portal. The purpose of this study was to investigate maternity patients' use and perceptions of a patient portal developed at the Mater Mothers' Hospital in Brisbane, Australia. A web-based patient portal, one of the first developed and deployed in Australia, was introduced on 26 June 2012. The portal was designed for maternity patients booked at Mater Mothers' Hospital, as an alternative to the paper-based Pregnancy Health Record. Through the portal, maternity patients are able to complete their hospital registration form online and obtain current health information about their pregnancy (via their EMR), as well as access a variety of support tools to use during their pregnancy such as tailored public health advice. A retrospective cross-sectional study design was employed. Usage statistics were extracted from the system for a one year period (1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013). Patients' perceptions of the portal were obtained using an online survey, accessible by maternity patients for two weeks in February 2013 (n=80). Descriptive statistics were employed to analyse the data. Between July 2012 and June 2013, 10,892 maternity patients were offered a patient portal account and access to their EMR. Of those 6,518 created one (60%; 6,518/10,892) and 3,104 went on to request access to their EMR (48%; 3,104/6,518). Of these, 1,751 had their access application granted by 30 June 2013. The majority of maternity patients submitted registration forms online via the patient portal (56.7%). Patients could view their EMR multiple times: there were 671 views of the EMR, 2,781 views of appointment schedules and 135 birth preferences submitted via the EMR. Eighty survey responses were received from EMR account holders, (response rate of 8.1%; 80/985). The majority of respondents indicated they would use the portal and access their EMR for future pregnancies (86.2%; 69/80). Approximately half looked at their EMR after a visit with their care provider (51.3%); 41/80) and 37.5% (30/80) viewed their EMR before, to prepare for their visit. The majority (65.8%) thought that the EMR improved their ability to understand and recall appointments and almost half (48.1%) thought that with the EMR they were less likely to repeat pregnancy information to caregivers. This study provides the first Australian evidence of a patient portal system, tied to an EMR, working effectively in a maternity care context. It provides new evidence that portals can deliver benefits to maternity patients in terms of providing quick and easy access to current personal and general health information and support patients in their ability to recall and prepare for appointments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产妇对其电子医疗记录的访问:患者门户的使用和视角。
多年来,患者一直能够从纸质健康记录中获取临床信息。随着电子医疗记录(emr)的出现,现在可以使用安全的电子患者门户在线访问这些信息。本研究的目的是调查产科患者对澳大利亚布里斯班母亲医院开发的患者门户网站的使用和看法。一个基于网络的患者门户网站于2012年6月26日推出,这是澳大利亚最早开发和部署的门户网站之一。该门户网站是为在Mater母亲医院预约的产妇设计的,作为纸质妊娠健康记录的替代方案。通过该门户网站,产妇能够在线填写医院登记表,获得有关其怀孕的最新健康信息(通过其电子病历),并获得在怀孕期间使用的各种支持工具,如量身定制的公共卫生咨询。采用回顾性横断面研究设计。从系统中提取了一年内(2012年7月1日至2013年6月30日)的使用统计数据。患者对门户网站的看法是通过在线调查获得的,2013年2月,产妇患者可以访问两周(n=80)。采用描述性统计方法对数据进行分析。在2012年7月至2013年6月期间,10,892名产妇获得了患者门户帐户并可访问其电子病历。其中6518人创造了一个(60%;6,518/10,892), 3,104人继续要求查阅他们的电子病历(48%;3104/6518)。其中,1751人在2013年6月30日之前获得了准入申请。大多数产妇通过患者门户网站在线提交登记表格(56.7%)。患者可以多次查看他们的电子病历:有671个电子病历视图,2781个预约时间表视图和135个通过电子病历提交的出生偏好。收到来自电子病历账户持有人的80份调查回复,(回复率为8.1%;80/985)。大多数受访者表示,他们将使用门户网站并在未来怀孕时访问他们的电子病历(86.2%;69/80)。大约一半的人在与护理人员会面后查看了他们的电子病历(51.3%);41/80)和37.5%(30/80)的人在就诊前查看了他们的电子病历。大多数人(65.8%)认为电子病历提高了他们理解和回忆预约的能力,几乎一半(48.1%)认为使用电子病历他们不太可能向护理人员重复怀孕信息。这项研究提供了澳大利亚第一个病人门户系统的证据,与电子病历捆绑在一起,在产科护理方面有效地工作。它提供了新的证据,表明门户网站可以为产妇患者带来好处,因为它提供了快速方便地访问当前个人和一般健康信息的途径,并支持患者回忆和准备预约的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Korean field trial of ICD-11 classification under practical clinical coding rules to clarify the reasons for inconsistencies. Digital hospital evaluation scale: A scale-development research study. A fiscally sound, evidenced-based solution to conquering the complexity of physician billing guidelines: A physician-centric note template. Defining career success: A cross-sectional analysis of health information managers' perceptions. Comparison of the accuracy of inpatient morbidity coding with ICD-11 and ICD-10.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1