Devjani Das, Monica Kapoor, Cara Brown, Afoma Ndubuisi, Sanjey Gupta
{"title":"Current status of emergency department attending physician ultrasound credentialing and quality assurance in the United States.","authors":"Devjani Das, Monica Kapoor, Cara Brown, Afoma Ndubuisi, Sanjey Gupta","doi":"10.1186/s13089-016-0042-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of emergency ultrasonography (EUS) has gained much popularity in the past few decades, and is now a mainstay of diagnostic decision-making. This expanded use is now highlighting the substantial issue of individual hospitals in credentialing its emergency medicine attending physicians in EUS in the United States. This issue is also of importance as more hospitals are now requesting reimbursements for emergency ultrasounds. The objective of this study is to gain an understanding of how many emergency departments are currently credentialing its attending staff in EUS, what the internal structure and staffing are of these emergency departments, and how they are currently performing quality assurance of the ultrasounds performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional, web-based survey sent to 160 ACGME-accredited EM residency programs from July 2013 to November 2013. The survey consisted of 23 questions regarding: (1) number of emergency medicine attendings on staff, (2) presence of an EUS fellowship, (3) quality assurance (QA) process, and (4) current US credentialing process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a 50 % response rate. Fifty percent of the total respondents (n = 40) had an EUS fellowship program. Of the sites with an EUS fellowship, 36 had EUS fellowship-trained attendings. Of the sites without an EUS fellowship, 19 had EUS fellowship-trained faculty, p ≤ 0.0001. Sites with an EUS fellowship had a greater percentage of staff credentialed to perform EUS as compared to sites with no EUS fellowship, p = 0.0161. All sites with an EUS fellowship had EUS-credentialed attendings. In sites with an EUS fellowship, 35 conducted a formal QA of ED performed EUS scans versus 22 at sites without an EUS fellowship, p = 0.003.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The survey results support hiring emergency attendings that have completed postgraduate training in emergency ultrasonography to aid in credentialing staff. This also seems to be helpful in completing a timelier QA of all ED ultrasounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":46598,"journal":{"name":"Critical Ultrasound Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4880803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-016-0042-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The use of emergency ultrasonography (EUS) has gained much popularity in the past few decades, and is now a mainstay of diagnostic decision-making. This expanded use is now highlighting the substantial issue of individual hospitals in credentialing its emergency medicine attending physicians in EUS in the United States. This issue is also of importance as more hospitals are now requesting reimbursements for emergency ultrasounds. The objective of this study is to gain an understanding of how many emergency departments are currently credentialing its attending staff in EUS, what the internal structure and staffing are of these emergency departments, and how they are currently performing quality assurance of the ultrasounds performed.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional, web-based survey sent to 160 ACGME-accredited EM residency programs from July 2013 to November 2013. The survey consisted of 23 questions regarding: (1) number of emergency medicine attendings on staff, (2) presence of an EUS fellowship, (3) quality assurance (QA) process, and (4) current US credentialing process.
Results: There was a 50 % response rate. Fifty percent of the total respondents (n = 40) had an EUS fellowship program. Of the sites with an EUS fellowship, 36 had EUS fellowship-trained attendings. Of the sites without an EUS fellowship, 19 had EUS fellowship-trained faculty, p ≤ 0.0001. Sites with an EUS fellowship had a greater percentage of staff credentialed to perform EUS as compared to sites with no EUS fellowship, p = 0.0161. All sites with an EUS fellowship had EUS-credentialed attendings. In sites with an EUS fellowship, 35 conducted a formal QA of ED performed EUS scans versus 22 at sites without an EUS fellowship, p = 0.003.
Conclusions: The survey results support hiring emergency attendings that have completed postgraduate training in emergency ultrasonography to aid in credentialing staff. This also seems to be helpful in completing a timelier QA of all ED ultrasounds.
背景:在过去的几十年里,急诊超声波检查(EUS)的使用越来越普及,现已成为诊断决策的主要手段。随着使用范围的扩大,美国各家医院在急诊科主治医师的 EUS 资格认证方面出现了重大问题。由于越来越多的医院要求报销急诊超声检查费用,因此这一问题也变得尤为重要。本研究的目的是了解目前有多少急诊科对其主治医师进行了 EUS 资格认证,这些急诊科的内部结构和人员配备情况如何,以及他们目前是如何对所做的超声检查进行质量保证的:这是一项横断面网络调查,于 2013 年 7 月至 2013 年 11 月期间发送给 160 个经 ACGME 认证的急诊科住院医师培训项目。调查包括 23 个问题,涉及:(1) 急诊科主治医师的人数;(2) 是否有 EUS 研究员;(3) 质量保证 (QA) 流程;(4) 当前的 US 认证流程:答复率为 50%。在所有受访者中,50% 的受访者(n = 40)拥有 EUS 奖学金项目。在拥有 EUS 奖学金的医疗机构中,36 家拥有接受过 EUS 奖学金培训的主治医师。在没有 EUS 奖学金的医疗机构中,19 家拥有受过 EUS 奖学金培训的教师,P ≤ 0.0001。与没有 EUS 奖学金的医疗机构相比,拥有 EUS 奖学金的医疗机构拥有 EUS 证书的员工比例更高,p = 0.0161。所有拥有 EUS 奖学金的医疗机构都有获得 EUS 证书的主治医师。在有 EUS 奖学金的医疗机构中,有 35 家对急诊室进行的 EUS 扫描进行了正式的质量评估,而在没有 EUS 奖学金的医疗机构中,只有 22 家进行了正式的质量评估,p = 0.003:调查结果支持聘用已完成急诊超声造影研究生培训的急诊主治医师,以协助对员工进行资格认证。这似乎也有助于更及时地完成所有急诊室超声检查的质量评估。