Prospective study on dental extractions carried out for paediatric patients under general anaesthetic in a district general hospital.

SAAD digest Pub Date : 2016-01-01
Tom Friend, Paul Allen
{"title":"Prospective study on dental extractions carried out for paediatric patients under general anaesthetic in a district general hospital.","authors":"Tom Friend,&nbsp;Paul Allen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The first line approach to managing healthy anxious children requiring dental extractions should include behavioural management and treatment under local anaesthetic. This can be coupled with conscious sedation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate alternative methods attempted prior to treatment under general anaesthesia (GA), to establish the incidence of repeat GA procedures.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Paediatric cases requiring dental extractions under GA were audited from October 2014 - December 2014 in the Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Great Western Hospital, Swindon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>78 paediatric cases requiring dental extractions were carried out during the study period. 91% of referrals came from local general dental practitioners (GDPs). The indication for the GA was included in 59% of the referral letters. The number of teeth extracted per case ranged from 1 - 14. In 18% of cases treatment under local anaesthetic had been attempted previously. Conscious sedation had not been attempted in any of the cases. There were 5 cases (6.4%) of repeat general anaesthetic procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Local guidance regarding appropriate paediatric referrals should be distributed to primary care referrers. Treatment under conscious sedation should be considered for paediatric cases and an improved referral pathway to the community dental service should be developed. Preventative advice should be reinforced to the referrer and to the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":21571,"journal":{"name":"SAAD digest","volume":"32 ","pages":"58-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAAD digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The first line approach to managing healthy anxious children requiring dental extractions should include behavioural management and treatment under local anaesthetic. This can be coupled with conscious sedation.

Aim: To evaluate alternative methods attempted prior to treatment under general anaesthesia (GA), to establish the incidence of repeat GA procedures.

Method: Paediatric cases requiring dental extractions under GA were audited from October 2014 - December 2014 in the Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Great Western Hospital, Swindon.

Results: 78 paediatric cases requiring dental extractions were carried out during the study period. 91% of referrals came from local general dental practitioners (GDPs). The indication for the GA was included in 59% of the referral letters. The number of teeth extracted per case ranged from 1 - 14. In 18% of cases treatment under local anaesthetic had been attempted previously. Conscious sedation had not been attempted in any of the cases. There were 5 cases (6.4%) of repeat general anaesthetic procedures.

Conclusion: Local guidance regarding appropriate paediatric referrals should be distributed to primary care referrers. Treatment under conscious sedation should be considered for paediatric cases and an improved referral pathway to the community dental service should be developed. Preventative advice should be reinforced to the referrer and to the patient.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
某地区综合医院全麻患儿拔牙的前瞻性研究。
背景:治疗需要拔牙的健康焦虑儿童的第一线方法应该包括行为管理和局部麻醉治疗。这可以与有意识的镇静相结合。目的:评估全麻治疗前尝试的替代方法,以确定重复全麻手术的发生率。方法:对2014年10月- 2014年12月在斯文顿大西部医院口腔颌面科进行的需要在GA下拔牙的儿科病例进行审计。结果:在研究期间进行了78例需要拔牙的儿科病例。91%的转诊来自当地的普通牙科医生(gdp)。59%的转诊信中包含GA的适应症。每个病例拔除的牙齿数量从1 - 14颗不等。18%的病例以前曾尝试过局部麻醉治疗。在所有病例中都没有尝试过有意识的镇静。重复全身麻醉5例(6.4%)。结论:有关适当儿科转诊的地方指南应分发给初级保健转诊者。对于儿科病例,应考虑在清醒镇静下进行治疗,并应制定一个更好的转诊途径到社区牙科服务。应加强对转诊者和病人的预防性建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hazards. Bispectral Index Guided Target Controlled Midazolam Sedation: a new advanced technique for dental procedures. Anaesthesia and Sedation for the Autistic Patient. The Clinical Management of the Gagging Patient. Behaviour Management of Children Presenting in the Emergency Department with OMFS Problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1