Clinical utility of quantitative multi-antibody Polycheck immunoassays in the diagnosis of coeliac disease.

Ewa Konopka, Maciej Grzywnowicz, Beata Oralewska, Joanna Cielecka-Kuszyk, Ilona Trojanowska, Bożena Cukrowska
{"title":"Clinical utility of quantitative multi-antibody Polycheck immunoassays in the diagnosis of coeliac disease.","authors":"Ewa Konopka,&nbsp;Maciej Grzywnowicz,&nbsp;Beata Oralewska,&nbsp;Joanna Cielecka-Kuszyk,&nbsp;Ilona Trojanowska,&nbsp;Bożena Cukrowska","doi":"10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the clinical utility of multi-antibody strategies in the diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD), the new quantitative Polycheck immunoassays were analysed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Polycheck Celiac Panels (PCPs) are immunoenzyme screening assays for the quantitative measurement of coeliac-specific immunoglobulin class G (IgG) or class A (IgA) in serum. Lines of relevant antigens are coated together with five IgG or IgA standard lines used for the standard curve as positive control. PCP IgA consists of human recombinant human tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP) as targets to detect IgA antibodies. PCP IgG consists of tTG, DGP and IF (intrinsic factor) antigens to detect antibodies in IgG class. PCPs were performed on 50 CD patients, including 6 cases with selective IgA deficiency, and 50 non-coeliac controls. CD diagnosis was performed according to the ESPGHAN recommendations: The presence of specific anti-tTG-IgA or anti-DGP-IgG (in the case of IgA deficiency) antibodies, typical histopathological changes in duodenal mucosa described in Marsh-Oberhüber classification as at least grade 2. The diagnosis of the majority of the control subjects was functional gastrointestinal disorders. The PCP results were compared with reference EliA Celikey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The usage of PCPs led to the correct identification of all CD patients. In our study, PCPs showed 100% agreement with the histopathological results. PCP IgA test showed a 98% concordance and correlated positively (R = 0.651, P = 0.0014) with EliA Celikey test. The highest specificity and positive predictive value (both 100%) were observed for the detection of Polycheck anti-tTG-IgA antibodies. The highest sensitivity and negative predictive value (both 100%) were achieved by Polycheck anti-DGP-IgG antibody detection. The best performance (98% sensitivity and negative predictive value, 100% specificity and positive predictive value, diagnostic accuracy - AU ROC 99%) was observed for the strategy of using both PCP IgA and IgG and determining positive outcomes of the test with two or more coeliac-specific antibodies detected. The majority of coeliac patients had multiple antibodies. All four antibodies were detected in 7 (14%) cases, 19 children (38%) were positive for three antibodies and 23 (46%) were positive for two antibodies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study showed that detection of coeliac-specific antibodies with multi-antibody PCPs is effective and efficacious in the diagnosis of CD.</p>","PeriodicalId":23755,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"7 2","pages":"254-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4848248/pdf/WJGPT-7-254.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the clinical utility of multi-antibody strategies in the diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD), the new quantitative Polycheck immunoassays were analysed.

Methods: Polycheck Celiac Panels (PCPs) are immunoenzyme screening assays for the quantitative measurement of coeliac-specific immunoglobulin class G (IgG) or class A (IgA) in serum. Lines of relevant antigens are coated together with five IgG or IgA standard lines used for the standard curve as positive control. PCP IgA consists of human recombinant human tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP) as targets to detect IgA antibodies. PCP IgG consists of tTG, DGP and IF (intrinsic factor) antigens to detect antibodies in IgG class. PCPs were performed on 50 CD patients, including 6 cases with selective IgA deficiency, and 50 non-coeliac controls. CD diagnosis was performed according to the ESPGHAN recommendations: The presence of specific anti-tTG-IgA or anti-DGP-IgG (in the case of IgA deficiency) antibodies, typical histopathological changes in duodenal mucosa described in Marsh-Oberhüber classification as at least grade 2. The diagnosis of the majority of the control subjects was functional gastrointestinal disorders. The PCP results were compared with reference EliA Celikey.

Results: The usage of PCPs led to the correct identification of all CD patients. In our study, PCPs showed 100% agreement with the histopathological results. PCP IgA test showed a 98% concordance and correlated positively (R = 0.651, P = 0.0014) with EliA Celikey test. The highest specificity and positive predictive value (both 100%) were observed for the detection of Polycheck anti-tTG-IgA antibodies. The highest sensitivity and negative predictive value (both 100%) were achieved by Polycheck anti-DGP-IgG antibody detection. The best performance (98% sensitivity and negative predictive value, 100% specificity and positive predictive value, diagnostic accuracy - AU ROC 99%) was observed for the strategy of using both PCP IgA and IgG and determining positive outcomes of the test with two or more coeliac-specific antibodies detected. The majority of coeliac patients had multiple antibodies. All four antibodies were detected in 7 (14%) cases, 19 children (38%) were positive for three antibodies and 23 (46%) were positive for two antibodies.

Conclusion: The present study showed that detection of coeliac-specific antibodies with multi-antibody PCPs is effective and efficacious in the diagnosis of CD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定量多抗体Polycheck免疫检测在乳糜泻诊断中的临床应用。
目的:评价多抗体策略在乳糜泻(CD)诊断中的临床应用,分析新型定量免疫检测方法Polycheck。方法:Polycheck腹腔panel (pcp)是一种定量测定血清中乳糜泻特异性免疫球蛋白G (IgG)或A (IgA)的免疫酶筛选方法。相关抗原线包被5条IgG或IgA标准线作为阳性对照,用于标准曲线。PCP IgA由重组人组织转谷氨酰胺酶(tTG)和脱酰胺麦胶蛋白肽(DGP)作为检测IgA抗体的靶点。PCP IgG由tTG、DGP和IF (intrinsic factor)抗原组成,用于检测IgG类抗体。对50例乳糜泻患者(包括6例选择性IgA缺乏症患者和50例非乳糜泻对照组)进行pcp检查。根据ESPGHAN建议进行CD诊断:存在特异性抗ttg -IgA或抗dgp - igg (IgA缺乏的情况下)抗体,在marsh - oberh ber分类中描述的十二指肠黏膜典型组织病理学改变至少为2级。大多数对照组的诊断为功能性胃肠疾病。将PCP结果与参考EliA Celikey进行比较。结果:pcp的使用导致所有CD患者的正确识别。在我们的研究中,pcp与组织病理学结果100%一致。PCP IgA检测结果与EliA Celikey检测结果的一致性为98%,呈正相关(R = 0.651, P = 0.0014)。Polycheck抗ttg - iga抗体检测的特异性最高,阳性预测值均为100%。Polycheck抗dgp - igg抗体检测灵敏度最高,阴性预测值均为100%。同时使用PCP IgA和IgG以及检测到两种或两种以上乳糜泻特异性抗体确定阳性结果的策略的最佳表现(98%的灵敏度和阴性预测值,100%的特异性和阳性预测值,诊断准确性- AU ROC 99%)。大多数乳糜泻患者有多种抗体。4种抗体全部检出7例(14%),3种抗体阳性19例(38%),2种抗体阳性23例(46%)。结论:多抗体pcp检测乳糜泻特异性抗体是诊断乳糜泻的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of an amino acid beverage formulation in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: A pragmatic real-world study Hepatitis C virus treatment with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir in patients co-prescribed carbamazepine: Three case reports. Update on the strategy for intravenous fluid treatment in acute pancreatitis. Cinnamic acid regulates the intestinal microbiome and short-chain fatty acids to treat slow transit constipation. "Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality, complications, or outcomes": Commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1