The Applicability of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Patients with Preoperative Motor Weakness during Spine Surgery.

Korean Journal of Spine Pub Date : 2016-03-01 Epub Date: 2016-03-31 DOI:10.14245/kjs.2016.13.1.9
Jae Meen Lee, Dong Hwan Kim, Hwan Soo Kim, Byung Kwan Choi, In Ho Han
{"title":"The Applicability of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Patients with Preoperative Motor Weakness during Spine Surgery.","authors":"Jae Meen Lee,&nbsp;Dong Hwan Kim,&nbsp;Hwan Soo Kim,&nbsp;Byung Kwan Choi,&nbsp;In Ho Han","doi":"10.14245/kjs.2016.13.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of our study is to evaluate the success rate and feasibility of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) focusing on transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring for patients with preoperative motor weakness in spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between November 2011 and December 2013, TcMEP and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring were attempted in 130 consecutive patients undergoing spine surgeries for cervical or thoracic cord lesions. Patients ranged in age from 14 to 81 years (mean±standard deviation, 56.7±14.8 years), and 84 patients were male. The success rates of both SSEP and MEPs monitoring were assessed according to the preoperative Medical Research Council (MRC) and Nurick grades.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TcMEP was recorded successfully in 0%, 28.6%, 72.3%, and 100% of patients with MRC grades 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. SSEP was obtained from 0%, 37.5%, 21.5%, 61.4%, and 85.4% of patients with MRC grades 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. TcMEP was recorded successfully in 84% of patients with Nurick grades 1-3 and 26% of patients with Nurick grades 4-5. SSEPs were recorded successfully in 76.3% of patients with Nurick grades 1-3 and 24% of patients with grades 4-5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IONM during spine surgery may be useless in patients with MRC grades 1-2, applicable MRC grade 3, and useful MRC grades 4-5. MRC grade 3 is a critical point of indication for application of MEPs. In unmonitorable cases with MRC grade 3, increasing stimulus intensity or facilitation techniques may be considered to improve the usefulness of TcMEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":17867,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1f/41/kjs-13-9.PMC4844661.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2016.13.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of our study is to evaluate the success rate and feasibility of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) focusing on transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring for patients with preoperative motor weakness in spine surgery.

Methods: Between November 2011 and December 2013, TcMEP and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring were attempted in 130 consecutive patients undergoing spine surgeries for cervical or thoracic cord lesions. Patients ranged in age from 14 to 81 years (mean±standard deviation, 56.7±14.8 years), and 84 patients were male. The success rates of both SSEP and MEPs monitoring were assessed according to the preoperative Medical Research Council (MRC) and Nurick grades.

Results: TcMEP was recorded successfully in 0%, 28.6%, 72.3%, and 100% of patients with MRC grades 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. SSEP was obtained from 0%, 37.5%, 21.5%, 61.4%, and 85.4% of patients with MRC grades 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. TcMEP was recorded successfully in 84% of patients with Nurick grades 1-3 and 26% of patients with Nurick grades 4-5. SSEPs were recorded successfully in 76.3% of patients with Nurick grades 1-3 and 24% of patients with grades 4-5.

Conclusion: IONM during spine surgery may be useless in patients with MRC grades 1-2, applicable MRC grade 3, and useful MRC grades 4-5. MRC grade 3 is a critical point of indication for application of MEPs. In unmonitorable cases with MRC grade 3, increasing stimulus intensity or facilitation techniques may be considered to improve the usefulness of TcMEP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术中神经监测在脊柱手术术前运动无力患者中的适用性。
目的:探讨以经颅运动诱发电位(TcMEP)监测为重点的术中神经监测(IONM)对脊柱手术患者术前运动无力的成功率和可行性。方法:2011年11月至2013年12月,对连续130例因颈、胸脊髓病变接受脊柱手术的患者进行TcMEP和体感诱发电位(SSEP)监测。年龄14 ~ 81岁(平均±标准差56.7±14.8岁),男性84例。根据术前医学研究委员会(MRC)和Nurick评分评估SSEP和MEPs监测的成功率。结果:MRC 1级、2级、3级、4级和5级患者的TcMEP成功率分别为0%、28.6%、72.3%和100%。分别有0%、37.5%、21.5%、61.4%和85.4%的MRC分级为1、2、3、4和5的患者获得SSEP。84%的Nurick分级为1-3级的患者和26%的Nurick分级为4-5级的患者成功使用了TcMEP。76.3%的Nurick分级为1-3级的患者和24%的4-5级的患者成功记录了ssep。结论:对于MRC分级为1-2级、适用的MRC分级为3级、有用的MRC分级为4-5级的患者,脊柱手术期间IONM可能无效。MRC 3级是MEPs应用的适应症临界点。在无法监测的MRC 3级病例中,可以考虑增加刺激强度或促进技术来提高TcMEP的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Myelography in the Assessment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Its Influence on Surgical Management. Expressing Cobb Angle as Linear Measurement in Scoliosis and Its Significance: A Clinical and Geometrical Analysis of Scoliosis. Comparison of Cervical Alignment and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Os Odontoideum versus Non-Os Odontoideum after Atlantoaxial Fixation. Whole Spine Disc Degeneration Survey according to the Ages and Sex Using Pfirrmann Disc Degeneration Grades. Korean Journal of Spine, the Long History of Archives of Spine Academia and the Beginning of a New Era.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1