Stand-Alone Cages for Anterior Cervical Fusion: Are There No Problems?

Korean Journal of Spine Pub Date : 2016-03-01 Epub Date: 2016-03-31 DOI:10.14245/kjs.2016.13.1.13
Sang Youp Han, Hyun Woo Kim, Cheol Young Lee, Hong Rye Kim, Dong Ho Park
{"title":"Stand-Alone Cages for Anterior Cervical Fusion: Are There No Problems?","authors":"Sang Youp Han,&nbsp;Hyun Woo Kim,&nbsp;Cheol Young Lee,&nbsp;Hong Rye Kim,&nbsp;Dong Ho Park","doi":"10.14245/kjs.2016.13.1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are complications in stand-alone cage assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), such as cage subsidence and kyphosis. Here we report our clinical result on ACDF, comparing with stand-alone cages and with cervical plate system for degenerative cervical spine diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with degenerative cervical disease who were diagnosed and treated in Konyang University Hospital between January 2004 and December 2014 were included in this study. Patients who had operation in single level ACDF were selected. Patients scored the degree of pain using visual analog scale before and after the surgery. Subsidence was defined as ≥3-mm decrease of the segmental height, and cervical kyphosis was defined as progression of ≥5° at 12 months after postoperative follow-up compared to that measured at the immediate postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81 patients were enrolled for this study. Forty-five patients were included in a cervical plate group and the others were in stand-alone cage group. There was no statistical difference in pain score between the 2 groups. Segmental subsidence was observed in 7 patients (15.6%) in plate-assisted cervical fusion group, and 13 patients (36.1%) in stand-alone cage group. Segmental kyphosis was observed in 4 patients (8.9%) in plate-assisted cervical fusion group, and 10 patients (27.8%) in stand-alone cage group. There was statistical difference between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no difference in pain between 2 groups. But stand-alone case group showed higher incidence rate than plate-assisted cervical fusion group in segmental subsidence and cervical kyphosis. When designing cervical fusion, more attention should be given selecting the surgical technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":17867,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ca/b9/kjs-13-13.PMC4844655.pdf","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2016.13.1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Objective: There are complications in stand-alone cage assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), such as cage subsidence and kyphosis. Here we report our clinical result on ACDF, comparing with stand-alone cages and with cervical plate system for degenerative cervical spine diseases.

Methods: Patients with degenerative cervical disease who were diagnosed and treated in Konyang University Hospital between January 2004 and December 2014 were included in this study. Patients who had operation in single level ACDF were selected. Patients scored the degree of pain using visual analog scale before and after the surgery. Subsidence was defined as ≥3-mm decrease of the segmental height, and cervical kyphosis was defined as progression of ≥5° at 12 months after postoperative follow-up compared to that measured at the immediate postoperative period.

Results: A total of 81 patients were enrolled for this study. Forty-five patients were included in a cervical plate group and the others were in stand-alone cage group. There was no statistical difference in pain score between the 2 groups. Segmental subsidence was observed in 7 patients (15.6%) in plate-assisted cervical fusion group, and 13 patients (36.1%) in stand-alone cage group. Segmental kyphosis was observed in 4 patients (8.9%) in plate-assisted cervical fusion group, and 10 patients (27.8%) in stand-alone cage group. There was statistical difference between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: There was no difference in pain between 2 groups. But stand-alone case group showed higher incidence rate than plate-assisted cervical fusion group in segmental subsidence and cervical kyphosis. When designing cervical fusion, more attention should be given selecting the surgical technique.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
独立颈椎前路融合器:没有问题吗?
目的:独立式椎笼辅助前路颈椎椎间盘切除术融合术(ACDF)存在椎笼下沉和后凸等并发症。在这里,我们报告了ACDF的临床结果,比较了单独的颈椎笼和颈椎板系统治疗退行性颈椎疾病。方法:选取2004年1月至2014年12月在锦阳大学附属医院诊治的退行性宫颈病变患者为研究对象。选择单节段ACDF行手术的患者。手术前后采用视觉模拟评分法对疼痛程度进行评分。下陷定义为节段高度下降≥3mm,颈椎后凸定义为术后随访12个月后与术后即时测量相比进展≥5°。结果:共有81例患者入组。45例患者为颈椎钢板组,其余患者为独立笼组。两组患者疼痛评分差异无统计学意义。钢板辅助颈椎融合组有7例(15.6%)出现节段性下沉,独立椎笼组有13例(36.1%)出现节段性下沉。钢板辅助颈椎融合组4例(8.9%)出现节段性后凸,独立椎笼组10例(27.8%)。两组间差异有统计学意义。结论:两组患者疼痛程度无明显差异。但单独病例组在节段性下沉和颈椎后凸的发生率高于钢板辅助颈椎融合组。在设计颈椎融合术时,应注意手术技术的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Myelography in the Assessment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Its Influence on Surgical Management. Expressing Cobb Angle as Linear Measurement in Scoliosis and Its Significance: A Clinical and Geometrical Analysis of Scoliosis. Comparison of Cervical Alignment and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Os Odontoideum versus Non-Os Odontoideum after Atlantoaxial Fixation. Whole Spine Disc Degeneration Survey according to the Ages and Sex Using Pfirrmann Disc Degeneration Grades. Korean Journal of Spine, the Long History of Archives of Spine Academia and the Beginning of a New Era.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1