[Comparison of sampling strategies to detect porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in a simulated pig producing plant].

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift Pub Date : 2016-05-01
Ian Kopacka, Klemens Fuchs, Friedrich Schmoll, Tatjana Sattler
{"title":"[Comparison of sampling strategies to detect porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in a simulated pig producing plant].","authors":"Ian Kopacka,&nbsp;Klemens Fuchs,&nbsp;Friedrich Schmoll,&nbsp;Tatjana Sattler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effectivity of different sampling schemes for the early detection of the introduction of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus into a pig herd was evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation. Within a theoretical breeding herd of 300 animals, disease transmission was simulated using a stochastic SEIR model incorporating actual animal movement data. The following parameters were evaluated for different sample sizes, sampling frequencies and diagnostic procedures (ELISA, PCR): the time from virus introduction until detection, the daily detection probability and the number of holdings to which infected animals are shipped before the disease is detected. The results show that the sample size has an influence on early detection. The biggest effects are, however, achieved by shortening the sampling intervals. The median detection time is approximately ten days shorter for PCR than for ELISA. If, however, the sampling intervals are chosen too wide there is a chance of overlooking the disease using PCR alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":8761,"journal":{"name":"Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effectivity of different sampling schemes for the early detection of the introduction of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus into a pig herd was evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation. Within a theoretical breeding herd of 300 animals, disease transmission was simulated using a stochastic SEIR model incorporating actual animal movement data. The following parameters were evaluated for different sample sizes, sampling frequencies and diagnostic procedures (ELISA, PCR): the time from virus introduction until detection, the daily detection probability and the number of holdings to which infected animals are shipped before the disease is detected. The results show that the sample size has an influence on early detection. The biggest effects are, however, achieved by shortening the sampling intervals. The median detection time is approximately ten days shorter for PCR than for ELISA. If, however, the sampling intervals are chosen too wide there is a chance of overlooking the disease using PCR alone.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[模拟养猪场猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒采样策略的比较]。
采用蒙特卡罗模拟方法,评价了不同采样方案对猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒传入猪群的早期检测效果。在300头动物的理论种畜群中,采用结合实际动物运动数据的随机SEIR模型模拟疾病传播。针对不同的样本量、采样频率和诊断程序(ELISA、PCR)评估了以下参数:从病毒引入到检测的时间、每日检测概率和在检测到疾病之前被运送到受感染动物的畜舍数量。结果表明,样本量对早期发现有影响。然而,最大的效果是通过缩短采样间隔来实现的。PCR的中位检测时间比ELISA大约短十天。但是,如果采样间隔选择得太宽,那么仅使用PCR就有可能忽略该疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of veterinary public health and its related subjects, such as epidemiology, bacteriology, virology, pathology, immunology, parasitology, and mycology. The journal publishes original research papers, review articles, case studies and short communications on farm animals, companion animals, equines, wild animals and laboratory animals. In addition, the editors regularly commission special issues on topics of major importance. The journal’s articles are published either in German or English and always include an abstract in the other language.
期刊最新文献
Analyse der Auswirkung unterschiedlicher ökologischer Milchviehhaltungssysteme in Bayern auf standardisiert erhobene Werte zu Milchleistung, Fortpflanzungsgeschehen und Stoffwechselgesundheit Coronaviruses in Bats Erfassung und Auswertung von Tierwohl­indikatoren im Rahmen der amtlichen Schlachttieruntersuchung bei Schlachtschweinen zur Optimierung der Tier­gesundheit im Herkunftsbetrieb und zur Anwendung als „Frühwarnsystem“ bei der Fleischuntersuchung Vaccines against Coronaviruses of Veterinary Importance Infrastructure of animal farms: key constructional elements in terms of biosecurity based on experience from Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1