Neonatal metabolic acidosis at birth: In search of a reliable marker

C. Racinet , P. Ouellet , F. Charles , T. Daboval
{"title":"Neonatal metabolic acidosis at birth: In search of a reliable marker","authors":"C. Racinet ,&nbsp;P. Ouellet ,&nbsp;F. Charles ,&nbsp;T. Daboval","doi":"10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>A newborn may present acidemia on the umbilical artery blood which can result from respiratory acidosis or metabolic acidosis or be of mixed origin. Currently, in the absence of a satisfactory definition, the challenge is to determine the most accurate marker for metabolic acidosis, which can be deleterious for the neonate.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We reviewed the methodological and physiological aspects of the perinatal literature to search for the best marker of NMA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Base deficit and pH have been criticized as the standard criteria to predict outcome. The proposed threshold of pathogenicity is not based on convincing studies. The algorithms of various blood gas analyzers differ and do not take into account the specific neonatal acid–base profile.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Birth-related neonatal eucapnic pH is described as the most pertinent marker of NMA at birth. The various means of calculating this value and the level below which it seems to play a possible pathogenic role are presented.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55077,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.04.005","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S129795891630100X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Objective

A newborn may present acidemia on the umbilical artery blood which can result from respiratory acidosis or metabolic acidosis or be of mixed origin. Currently, in the absence of a satisfactory definition, the challenge is to determine the most accurate marker for metabolic acidosis, which can be deleterious for the neonate.

Methods

We reviewed the methodological and physiological aspects of the perinatal literature to search for the best marker of NMA.

Results

Base deficit and pH have been criticized as the standard criteria to predict outcome. The proposed threshold of pathogenicity is not based on convincing studies. The algorithms of various blood gas analyzers differ and do not take into account the specific neonatal acid–base profile.

Conclusion

Birth-related neonatal eucapnic pH is described as the most pertinent marker of NMA at birth. The various means of calculating this value and the level below which it seems to play a possible pathogenic role are presented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿出生时代谢性酸中毒:寻找可靠的标志物
目的新生儿脐动脉血酸血症可由呼吸性酸中毒、代谢性酸中毒或混合原因引起。目前,在缺乏一个令人满意的定义,挑战是确定代谢性酸中毒最准确的标志,这可能是有害的新生儿。方法回顾方法学和生理学方面的文献,寻找最佳的NMA标记物。结果碱缺乏症和pH值被认为是预测预后的标准。提出的致病性阈值并不是基于令人信服的研究。各种血气分析仪的算法不同,没有考虑到具体的新生儿酸碱谱。结论出生相关性新生儿宫颈pH值是出生时NMA最相关的标志物。提出了计算这个值的各种方法,以及低于这个值可能起致病作用的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Hysterosonography]. Editorial Board Cancer du sein et diabète de type 2 : des interactions complexes [Does the use of deodorant cause breast cancer? It remains to be proved]. Tumors in recent Prehistory. Contributions from Cova des Pas (Menorca Island).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1