THE ROLE OF THE ISRAELI COURTS IN FORMULATING THE PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP.

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW MEDICINE AND LAW Pub Date : 2014-10-01
Limor Malul
{"title":"THE ROLE OF THE ISRAELI COURTS IN FORMULATING THE PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP.","authors":"Limor Malul","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The nature of physician-patient relationships has been documented in the ancient Greek and Roman, as well as in that of the Middle Ages and modern times' literature. Far back as in Hippocrates' writings, ethical dilemmas including those concerning patient-physician relationships, patient consent to treatment and end of life issues have been raised and discussed. Over time, changes have occurred in the dynamic between the diverse values that are taken into consideration when defining the therapeutic milieu. The nature of this dyad has have moved from a paternalistic framework empowering the physician and emphasizing the patient's wellbeing, to a relational framework that empowers the patient and is focused on his desires and rights. The pendulum of the physician-patient relationship is continually adjusted, in each era, in accordance with contemporary social values and by norms that have been shaped by judicial tribunals and legislation. Viewing the issue of physician-patient relationship as an ethical dilemma deeply rooted within social-cultural contexts demands the formulation of a theoretical framework incorporating the relevant ethical principles and a system of implementation that constitutes a declaration of intention concerning the values we thereby wish to protect. The current state of affairs in which legal and legislative arrangements prefer patient autonomy above other significant social values, could provide the foundation for a more stable, appropriate and fruitful physician-patient relationship. This article wishes to critically examine the questions of whether and, in what ways, the law influences the character of the physician-patient relationship and the implications of such influence for medical policy and practice. In light of the lack of consistency of rulings in this domain, the necessity of adopting ethical guidelines through legislation and need for the legal system to constructively and systematically balance the diverse ethical approaches regarding the physician-patient relationship, becomes clear.</p>","PeriodicalId":54182,"journal":{"name":"MEDICINE AND LAW","volume":"33 3","pages":"61-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDICINE AND LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nature of physician-patient relationships has been documented in the ancient Greek and Roman, as well as in that of the Middle Ages and modern times' literature. Far back as in Hippocrates' writings, ethical dilemmas including those concerning patient-physician relationships, patient consent to treatment and end of life issues have been raised and discussed. Over time, changes have occurred in the dynamic between the diverse values that are taken into consideration when defining the therapeutic milieu. The nature of this dyad has have moved from a paternalistic framework empowering the physician and emphasizing the patient's wellbeing, to a relational framework that empowers the patient and is focused on his desires and rights. The pendulum of the physician-patient relationship is continually adjusted, in each era, in accordance with contemporary social values and by norms that have been shaped by judicial tribunals and legislation. Viewing the issue of physician-patient relationship as an ethical dilemma deeply rooted within social-cultural contexts demands the formulation of a theoretical framework incorporating the relevant ethical principles and a system of implementation that constitutes a declaration of intention concerning the values we thereby wish to protect. The current state of affairs in which legal and legislative arrangements prefer patient autonomy above other significant social values, could provide the foundation for a more stable, appropriate and fruitful physician-patient relationship. This article wishes to critically examine the questions of whether and, in what ways, the law influences the character of the physician-patient relationship and the implications of such influence for medical policy and practice. In light of the lack of consistency of rulings in this domain, the necessity of adopting ethical guidelines through legislation and need for the legal system to constructively and systematically balance the diverse ethical approaches regarding the physician-patient relationship, becomes clear.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以色列法院在制定医患关系中的作用。
医患关系的本质在古希腊和古罗马,以及中世纪和现代文学中都有记载。早在希波克拉底的著作中,包括医患关系、患者对治疗的同意和生命终结问题在内的伦理困境就被提出和讨论过。随着时间的推移,在定义治疗环境时所考虑的不同值之间的动态变化已经发生。这种二元关系的本质已经从一种家长式的框架,赋予医生权力,强调病人的幸福,转变为一种关系框架,赋予病人权力,关注他的愿望和权利。医患关系的钟摆在每个时代都在不断调整,以符合当代社会价值观和由司法法庭和立法形成的规范。将医患关系问题视为深深植根于社会文化背景中的伦理困境,需要制定一个包含相关伦理原则和实施系统的理论框架,从而构成我们希望保护的价值观的意图宣言。目前的状况是,法律和立法安排将患者自主权置于其他重要的社会价值之上,这可以为更稳定、适当和富有成效的医患关系提供基础。本文希望批判性地考察法律是否以及以何种方式影响医患关系的特征,以及这种影响对医疗政策和实践的影响。鉴于这一领域的裁决缺乏一致性,通过立法采用道德准则的必要性以及法律体系建设性和系统地平衡医患关系中各种道德方法的必要性变得清晰起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can a patient’s death go unpunished? Social Marketing Challenges in Western Balkans: Evidence From Kosovo Domestic Violence During the COVID-19 Pandemic – Analysis of Legal Solutions Adopted by Selected European Countries The, Of, For, In The Use of Amicable Settlement for Resolving Medical Malparctice in Indonesia The Importance of labeling products with a GMO or non-GMO label
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1