Exploring the Perceptions and Health Behaviours of Patients Following an Elective Ad-hoc Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Qualitative Study.

Karen Throndson, Jo-Ann V Sawatzky, Annette Schultz
{"title":"Exploring the Perceptions and Health Behaviours of Patients Following an Elective Ad-hoc Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Karen Throndson,&nbsp;Jo-Ann V Sawatzky,&nbsp;Annette Schultz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants expressed uncertainty about their future health and feared disease recurrence, which appeared to provide motivation for adopting a healthier lifestyle. Although two participants voiced the belief that the elective PCI cured their disease, this perception did not appear to influence their engagement in risk reduction behaviours. However, systemfactors such as a lack of information, direction, and/or support from health care providers appeared to play a limiting role in their ability to move forward with lifestyle change.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Elective ad-hoc percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are increasingly used to manage the symptoms of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, we have limited understanding of the patients' experiences and health behaviours post-procedure.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Explore the factors that influence the perceptions and health behaviours of patients after elective ad-hoc PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This interpretive descriptive study used purposive sampling to recruit participants (N = 10) aged 44 to 65 years following an elective ad-hoc PCI from a cardiac catheterization laboratory at a tertiary centre in Winnipeg, MB. Participants were interviewed 11 to 35 days following their procedure. Recruitment continued until no new substantive themes emerged. The Health Belief Model provided the frameworkfor developing, exploring, interpreting, and analyzing the data.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Nurses have a key role in the education of patients and in providingpatient-centred care that supports lifestyle change. Nurses need to develop strategies that decrease barriers to engaging in risk reduction behaviours following elective ad-hoc PCI if patients are to experience improved health and longevity.</p>","PeriodicalId":77057,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of cardiovascular nursing = Journal canadien en soins infirmiers cardio-vasculaires","volume":"26 2","pages":"25-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of cardiovascular nursing = Journal canadien en soins infirmiers cardio-vasculaires","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Results: Participants expressed uncertainty about their future health and feared disease recurrence, which appeared to provide motivation for adopting a healthier lifestyle. Although two participants voiced the belief that the elective PCI cured their disease, this perception did not appear to influence their engagement in risk reduction behaviours. However, systemfactors such as a lack of information, direction, and/or support from health care providers appeared to play a limiting role in their ability to move forward with lifestyle change.

Background: Elective ad-hoc percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are increasingly used to manage the symptoms of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, we have limited understanding of the patients' experiences and health behaviours post-procedure.

Purpose: Explore the factors that influence the perceptions and health behaviours of patients after elective ad-hoc PCI.

Methods: This interpretive descriptive study used purposive sampling to recruit participants (N = 10) aged 44 to 65 years following an elective ad-hoc PCI from a cardiac catheterization laboratory at a tertiary centre in Winnipeg, MB. Participants were interviewed 11 to 35 days following their procedure. Recruitment continued until no new substantive themes emerged. The Health Belief Model provided the frameworkfor developing, exploring, interpreting, and analyzing the data.

Practice implications: Nurses have a key role in the education of patients and in providingpatient-centred care that supports lifestyle change. Nurses need to develop strategies that decrease barriers to engaging in risk reduction behaviours following elective ad-hoc PCI if patients are to experience improved health and longevity.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索选择性特设经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者的认知和健康行为:一项定性研究。
结果:参与者对自己未来的健康状况表示不确定,并担心疾病复发,这似乎为采取更健康的生活方式提供了动力。尽管两名参与者认为选择性PCI治疗治愈了他们的疾病,但这种看法似乎并没有影响他们参与降低风险的行为。然而,系统因素,如缺乏信息、指导和/或卫生保健提供者的支持,似乎在他们改变生活方式的能力中发挥了限制作用。背景:选择性特设经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pci)越来越多地用于治疗冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的症状。然而,我们对患者的经历和术后健康行为的了解有限。目的:探讨影响选择性临时PCI术后患者认知和健康行为的因素。方法:本解释性描述性研究采用有目的抽样的方法,招募年龄在44至65岁之间的参与者(N = 10),他们在温尼伯一家第三中心的心导管实验室接受了选择性临时PCI治疗。参与者在手术后11至35天接受了采访。征聘工作继续进行,直到没有出现新的实质性主题。健康信念模型为数据的开发、探索、解释和分析提供了框架。实践意义:护士在患者教育和提供以患者为中心的支持生活方式改变的护理方面发挥着关键作用。如果患者想要改善健康和寿命,护士需要制定策略,减少在选择性特设PCI后从事降低风险行为的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mind the Gap: Women and Acute Myocardial Infarctions-An Integrated Review of Literature. Augmentation Index and Pulse Wave Velocity--Agreement of Two Indicators and Relationships to Blood Pressures. Easing the Economic Burden of Atrial Fibrillation: Making the Case for a Structured Clinical Nurse Specialist-Led Outpatient Clinic. A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Development and Implementation of Best Practices Usng an Innovative Clinical Pathway for the Management of Cardiac Arrest Patients with Cognitive Dysfunction: A Case Study. Risk Factors and Best Practices for the Prevention of Post-Cardiac Surgery Surgical Site Infections in a Tertiary Care Centre.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1