Observation of initial postoperative radiolucent lines using a modern pegged-glenoid design.

Nathan G Everding, Jonathan C Levy, Nathan T Formaini, Sara Blum, Carlos C Gil, Kevin Verde
{"title":"Observation of initial postoperative radiolucent lines using a modern pegged-glenoid design.","authors":"Nathan G Everding, Jonathan C Levy, Nathan T Formaini, Sara Blum, Carlos C Gil, Kevin Verde","doi":"10.4103/0973-6042.180718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Glenoid component loosening remains a common mode of failure for total shoulder arthroplasty and has inspired improvements in implant design, instrumentation, and surgical technique. The purpose of this manuscript was to evaluate the incidence of radiolucent lines and glenoid seating on initial postoperative radiographs using a modern pegged-glenoid design, instrumentation, and surgical technique.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of 100 pegged-glenoid total shoulder replacements. In cases of excessive glenoid version, the glenoid was asymmetrically reamed to recreate more normal version. Initial postoperative radiographs were evaluated for the presence of radiolucent lines and completeness of glenoid seating. The preoperative glenoid version measured on axial computed tomography (CT) scans was used to compare differences in version among those with complete and incompletely seated glenoids.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of radiolucent lines observed on postoperative radiographs was 0%. Complete glenoid seating (Grade A) was observed in 81 patients (observer 1) and 82 patients (observer 2). Measurements of preoperative CT scans found a higher percentage of abnormal glenoid version for incompletely seated glenoids (47%) than completely seated glenoids (34%) but no significant difference (P = 0.327). The mean preoperative glenoid retroversion for incompletely seated glenoids was 12.1° and 9.1° for completely seated glenoids (P = 0.263).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Modern surgical techniques, surgical instrumentation, and peg glenoid design have facilitated the ability to eliminate radiolucent lines on initial postoperative radiographs with high rates of complete seating of glenoid components. Incomplete seating may be related to incomplete correction of glenoid version.</p>","PeriodicalId":51295,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Shoulder Surgery","volume":"10 2","pages":"67-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/27/IJSS-10-67.PMC4857533.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Shoulder Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.180718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Glenoid component loosening remains a common mode of failure for total shoulder arthroplasty and has inspired improvements in implant design, instrumentation, and surgical technique. The purpose of this manuscript was to evaluate the incidence of radiolucent lines and glenoid seating on initial postoperative radiographs using a modern pegged-glenoid design, instrumentation, and surgical technique.

Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of 100 pegged-glenoid total shoulder replacements. In cases of excessive glenoid version, the glenoid was asymmetrically reamed to recreate more normal version. Initial postoperative radiographs were evaluated for the presence of radiolucent lines and completeness of glenoid seating. The preoperative glenoid version measured on axial computed tomography (CT) scans was used to compare differences in version among those with complete and incompletely seated glenoids.

Results: The rate of radiolucent lines observed on postoperative radiographs was 0%. Complete glenoid seating (Grade A) was observed in 81 patients (observer 1) and 82 patients (observer 2). Measurements of preoperative CT scans found a higher percentage of abnormal glenoid version for incompletely seated glenoids (47%) than completely seated glenoids (34%) but no significant difference (P = 0.327). The mean preoperative glenoid retroversion for incompletely seated glenoids was 12.1° and 9.1° for completely seated glenoids (P = 0.263).

Conclusions: Modern surgical techniques, surgical instrumentation, and peg glenoid design have facilitated the ability to eliminate radiolucent lines on initial postoperative radiographs with high rates of complete seating of glenoid components. Incomplete seating may be related to incomplete correction of glenoid version.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用现代钉状蝶鞍设计观察术后初期放射线。
目的:盂成形组件松动仍是全肩关节置换术的常见失败模式,促使植入物设计、器械和手术技术不断改进。本稿件旨在评估采用现代钉式盂成形设计、器械和手术技术的术后初始X光片上放射线和盂成形的发生率:我们对连续100例钉式盂成形全肩关节置换术进行了回顾性分析。在盂成形过度的病例中,我们对盂进行了不对称铰接,以重建更正常的盂成形。对术后初次X光片进行评估,以确定是否存在放射线和盂成形是否完整。利用轴向计算机断层扫描(CT)测量的术前盂成形度来比较盂成形完全与不完全就位者的盂成形度差异:结果:术后X光片上观察到的放射线比率为0%。81名患者(观察者1)和82名患者(观察者2)的盂骨完全就位(A级)。术前 CT 扫描的测量结果显示,未完全就位的盂成形异常比例(47%)高于完全就位的盂成形异常比例(34%),但无显著差异(P = 0.327)。不完全坐位盂成形术前的平均盂后倾角为12.1°,完全坐位盂成形术前的平均盂后倾角为9.1°(P = 0.263):结论:现代手术技术、手术器械和髋臼设计有助于消除术后初次X光片上的放射线,髋臼组件的完全就位率很高。未完全就位可能与盂成形未完全矫正有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.21
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
60 Convertible Humeral Stem: Anatomic to Reverse Arthroplasty 67 Arthroscopic Reduction and Internal Fixation of Glenoid Rim Fractures 16 Arthroscopic Biceps Transfer 45 Posterior Glenoid Wear in Total Shoulder Replacement: Eccentric Reaming 30 Partial Humeral Head Replacement: Allograft and Prosthetic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1