Rotator cuff tears after total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis: A systematic review.

David M Levy, Geoffrey D Abrams, Joshua D Harris, Bernard R Bach, Gregory P Nicholson, Anthony A Romeo
{"title":"Rotator cuff tears after total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis: A systematic review.","authors":"David M Levy,&nbsp;Geoffrey D Abrams,&nbsp;Joshua D Harris,&nbsp;Bernard R Bach,&nbsp;Gregory P Nicholson,&nbsp;Anthony A Romeo","doi":"10.4103/0973-6042.180720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rotator cuff tears have been reported to be uncommon following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Postoperative rotator cuff tears can lead to pain, proximal humeral migration, and glenoid component loosening. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the incidence of post-TSA rotator cuff tears or dysfunction in osteoarthritic patients. A systematic review of multiple databases was performed using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Levels I-IV evidence clinical studies of patients with primary osteoarthritis with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Fifteen studies with 1259 patients (1338 shoulders) were selected. Student's t-tests were used with a significant alpha value of 0.05. All patients demonstrated significant improvements in motion and validated clinical outcome scores (P < 0.001). Radiographic humeral head migration was the most commonly reported data point for extrapolation of rotator cuff integrity. After 6.6 ± 3.1 years, 29.9 ± 20.7% of shoulders demonstrated superior humeral head migration and 17.9 ± 14.3% migrated a distance more than 25% of the head. This was associated with an 11.3 ± 7.9% incidence of postoperative superior cuff tears. The incidence of radiographic anterior humeral head migration was 11.9 ± 15.9%, corresponding to a 3.0 ± 13.6% rate of subscapularis tears. We found an overall 1.2 ± 4.5% rate of reoperation for cuff injury. Nearly all studies reported indirect markers of rotator cuff dysfunction, such as radiographic humeral head migration and clinical exam findings. This systematic review suggests that rotator cuff dysfunction following TSA may be more common than previously reported. IV, systematic review of Levels I-IV studies. </p>","PeriodicalId":51295,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Shoulder Surgery","volume":"10 2","pages":"78-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/7f/IJSS-10-78.PMC4857535.pdf","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Shoulder Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.180720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Rotator cuff tears have been reported to be uncommon following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Postoperative rotator cuff tears can lead to pain, proximal humeral migration, and glenoid component loosening. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the incidence of post-TSA rotator cuff tears or dysfunction in osteoarthritic patients. A systematic review of multiple databases was performed using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Levels I-IV evidence clinical studies of patients with primary osteoarthritis with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Fifteen studies with 1259 patients (1338 shoulders) were selected. Student's t-tests were used with a significant alpha value of 0.05. All patients demonstrated significant improvements in motion and validated clinical outcome scores (P < 0.001). Radiographic humeral head migration was the most commonly reported data point for extrapolation of rotator cuff integrity. After 6.6 ± 3.1 years, 29.9 ± 20.7% of shoulders demonstrated superior humeral head migration and 17.9 ± 14.3% migrated a distance more than 25% of the head. This was associated with an 11.3 ± 7.9% incidence of postoperative superior cuff tears. The incidence of radiographic anterior humeral head migration was 11.9 ± 15.9%, corresponding to a 3.0 ± 13.6% rate of subscapularis tears. We found an overall 1.2 ± 4.5% rate of reoperation for cuff injury. Nearly all studies reported indirect markers of rotator cuff dysfunction, such as radiographic humeral head migration and clinical exam findings. This systematic review suggests that rotator cuff dysfunction following TSA may be more common than previously reported. IV, systematic review of Levels I-IV studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性骨关节炎全肩关节置换术后肩袖撕裂:系统回顾。
据报道,肩袖撕裂在全肩关节置换术(TSA)后并不常见。术后肩袖撕裂可导致疼痛、肱骨近端移位和肩关节部件松动。本文的目的是评估骨关节炎患者tsa后肩袖撕裂或功能障碍的发生率。对多个数据库进行系统评价,采用首选报告项目进行系统评价和荟萃分析指南。纳入了至少2年随访的原发性骨关节炎患者的I-IV级证据临床研究。15项研究共纳入1259例患者(1338个肩关节)。采用学生t检验,显著α值为0.05。所有患者的运动和临床结果评分均有显著改善(P < 0.001)。胸片肱骨头移位是外推肩袖完整性最常报道的数据点。6.6±3.1年后,29.9±20.7%的肩部表现出肱骨头迁移优势,17.9±14.3%的肩部迁移距离超过25%的头部。这与11.3±7.9%的术后上袖撕裂发生率相关。肱骨前头移位的x线发生率为11.9±15.9%,对应于肩胛下肌撕裂的3.0±13.6%。我们发现袖带损伤的再手术率为1.2±4.5%。几乎所有的研究都报道了肩袖功能障碍的间接标志,如胸片肱骨头移位和临床检查结果。本系统综述表明,TSA术后的肩袖功能障碍可能比先前报道的更为常见。IV, I-IV级研究的系统综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.21
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
60 Convertible Humeral Stem: Anatomic to Reverse Arthroplasty 67 Arthroscopic Reduction and Internal Fixation of Glenoid Rim Fractures 16 Arthroscopic Biceps Transfer 45 Posterior Glenoid Wear in Total Shoulder Replacement: Eccentric Reaming 30 Partial Humeral Head Replacement: Allograft and Prosthetic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1