LandScape: a simple method to aggregate p-values and other stochastic variables without a priori grouping.

Pub Date : 2016-08-01 DOI:10.1515/sagmb-2015-0085
Carsten Wiuf, Jonatan Schaumburg-Müller Pallesen, Leslie Foldager, Jakob Grove
{"title":"LandScape: a simple method to aggregate p-values and other stochastic variables without a priori grouping.","authors":"Carsten Wiuf,&nbsp;Jonatan Schaumburg-Müller Pallesen,&nbsp;Leslie Foldager,&nbsp;Jakob Grove","doi":"10.1515/sagmb-2015-0085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In many areas of science it is custom to perform many, potentially millions, of tests simultaneously. To gain statistical power it is common to group tests based on a priori criteria such as predefined regions or by sliding windows. However, it is not straightforward to choose grouping criteria and the results might depend on the chosen criteria. Methods that summarize, or aggregate, test statistics or p-values, without relying on a priori criteria, are therefore desirable. We present a simple method to aggregate a sequence of stochastic variables, such as test statistics or p-values, into fewer variables without assuming a priori defined groups. We provide different ways to evaluate the significance of the aggregated variables based on theoretical considerations and resampling techniques, and show that under certain assumptions the FWER is controlled in the strong sense. Validity of the method was demonstrated using simulations and real data analyses. Our method may be a useful supplement to standard procedures relying on evaluation of test statistics individually. Moreover, by being agnostic and not relying on predefined selected regions, it might be a practical alternative to conventionally used methods of aggregation of p-values over regions. The method is implemented in Python and freely available online (through GitHub, see the Supplementary information).</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/sagmb-2015-0085","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sagmb-2015-0085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In many areas of science it is custom to perform many, potentially millions, of tests simultaneously. To gain statistical power it is common to group tests based on a priori criteria such as predefined regions or by sliding windows. However, it is not straightforward to choose grouping criteria and the results might depend on the chosen criteria. Methods that summarize, or aggregate, test statistics or p-values, without relying on a priori criteria, are therefore desirable. We present a simple method to aggregate a sequence of stochastic variables, such as test statistics or p-values, into fewer variables without assuming a priori defined groups. We provide different ways to evaluate the significance of the aggregated variables based on theoretical considerations and resampling techniques, and show that under certain assumptions the FWER is controlled in the strong sense. Validity of the method was demonstrated using simulations and real data analyses. Our method may be a useful supplement to standard procedures relying on evaluation of test statistics individually. Moreover, by being agnostic and not relying on predefined selected regions, it might be a practical alternative to conventionally used methods of aggregation of p-values over regions. The method is implemented in Python and freely available online (through GitHub, see the Supplementary information).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
景观:一种简单的方法来汇总p值和其他随机变量没有先验分组。
在许多科学领域,人们习惯同时进行许多,甚至可能是数百万次的测试。为了获得统计能力,通常基于先验标准(如预定义区域或滑动窗口)对测试进行分组。然而,选择分组标准并不简单,结果可能取决于所选择的标准。因此,不依赖于先验标准的总结或汇总检验统计量或p值的方法是可取的。我们提出了一种简单的方法,将一系列随机变量(如检验统计量或p值)聚合到更少的变量中,而无需假设先验定义的组。基于理论考虑和重采样技术,我们提供了不同的方法来评估聚合变量的显著性,并表明在某些假设下,FWER在强意义上受到控制。通过仿真和实际数据分析,验证了该方法的有效性。我们的方法可能是一个有用的补充标准程序依赖于评估检验统计量单独。此外,由于它是不可知论的,并且不依赖于预定义的选定区域,它可能是传统上使用的p值在区域上聚合方法的一种实际替代方法。该方法是用Python实现的,并且可以在线免费获得(通过GitHub,参见补充信息)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1