Fluticasone furoate/Vilanterol 92/22 μg once-a-day vs Beclomethasone dipropionate/ Formoterol 100/6 μg b.i.d.: a 12-week cost analysis in mild-to-moderate asthma.

IF 2.3 Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine Pub Date : 2016-06-06 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40248-016-0055-2
Roberto W Dal Negro, Chiara Distante, Luca Bonadiman, Paola Turco, Sergio Iannazzo
{"title":"Fluticasone furoate/Vilanterol 92/22 μg once-a-day vs Beclomethasone dipropionate/ Formoterol 100/6 μg b.i.d.: a 12-week cost analysis in mild-to-moderate asthma.","authors":"Roberto W Dal Negro,&nbsp;Chiara Distante,&nbsp;Luca Bonadiman,&nbsp;Paola Turco,&nbsp;Sergio Iannazzo","doi":"10.1186/s40248-016-0055-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma is a disease with high cost for the National Health Service. Two of the most recent LABA/ICS combinations for persistent bronchial asthma are Beclomethasone dipropionate/Formoterol (B/F) delivered via the Nexthaler device and Fluticasone furoate/Vilanterol (F/V) delivered via the Ellipta device. No comparison has been carried out yet in terms of cost analysis in asthma, to our knowledge. Aim of the present monocentric, observational, retrospective study was to calculate and compare the costs of mild-to-moderate asthma patients assuming B/F 100/6 μg b.i.d. to those of patients assuming F/V 92/22 μg once-a-day over a 12-week treatment period from the Italian National Health Service perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained automatically and anonymously from the institutional database of the Lung Unit of the Specialist Medical Centre (CEMS), Verona, Italy, UNI EN ISO 9001-2008 validated. FEV1 values, number of relapses, healthcare resources as hospitalizations due to asthma relapses, days of hospitalization, general practitioner (GP), specialist visits, and days of inactivity, were recorded over the study period together with the use of extra medications (systemic steroids and antibiotics). In order to compare the outcomes achieved in both groups, the propensity score matching method was used in STATA, and statistical significance was accepted for p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical data of 77 patients treated with B/F b.i.d (Group A) and of 40 patients treated with F/V 92/22 μg once-a-day (Group B) were selected. The PS-matching process, designed as matching on the baseline covariates, gender, age, FEV1 and comorbidities, returned a cohort of 40 group A patients of the entire cohort matched with 40 patients of group B, fully comparable for demographics and clinical characteristics. In the PS-matched cohort, the mean (±SE) number of relapses per patient during the follow-up was 0.53 (±0.12) in group A and 0.28 (±0.07) in group B. In group A, n = 25 (62.50 %), n = 9 (22.50 %), and n = 6 (15 %) patients had 0, 1, 2 relapses, respectively. In group B, n = 29 (72.50 %), and n = 11 (27.50 %) had 0 and 1 relapse, respectively. Over the study period, the average number of hospitalizations per patient was 0.15 (±0.06), with 0.28 (±0.12) days of hospitalization in group A, and 0.08 (±0.04) with 0.08 (±0.04) days of hospitalization in group B, respectively. The difference between the two groups in terms of FEV1(L) improvement vs baseline was 0.11 in favour of group B (p = 0.007). When results were compared, the improvement in lung function obtained in group B proved significantly higher both in terms of absolute FEV1 and of FEV1 % predicted. The mean (±SE) cost of hospitalizations per patient was € 345.30 (±133.23) in group A and € 172.65 (±98.18) in group B, respectively, with a mean not significant difference of - € 172.65 in favour of group B (p = 0.9). In particular, the mean (±SE) cost for visits per patient was € 26.82 (±3.73) in group A and € 11.36 (±2.30) in group B (p = 0.002), and the mean cost for rescue medications per patient was € 35.24 (±6.93) in group A, and € 18.73 (±3.38) in group B, respectively (p = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even if both ICS/LABA combinations were checked over a limited period of time, they seem characterized by a different profile in terms of effect on lung function and economic impact on mild-to-moderate asthma. The once-daily inhalation of combined Fluticasone furoate/Vilanterol 92/22 μg showed the potential for enhanced clinical outcomes and reduced costs when compared to Beclomethasone dipropionate/Formoterol 100/6 μg b.i.d.</p>","PeriodicalId":49031,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40248-016-0055-2","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40248-016-0055-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Asthma is a disease with high cost for the National Health Service. Two of the most recent LABA/ICS combinations for persistent bronchial asthma are Beclomethasone dipropionate/Formoterol (B/F) delivered via the Nexthaler device and Fluticasone furoate/Vilanterol (F/V) delivered via the Ellipta device. No comparison has been carried out yet in terms of cost analysis in asthma, to our knowledge. Aim of the present monocentric, observational, retrospective study was to calculate and compare the costs of mild-to-moderate asthma patients assuming B/F 100/6 μg b.i.d. to those of patients assuming F/V 92/22 μg once-a-day over a 12-week treatment period from the Italian National Health Service perspective.

Methods: Data were obtained automatically and anonymously from the institutional database of the Lung Unit of the Specialist Medical Centre (CEMS), Verona, Italy, UNI EN ISO 9001-2008 validated. FEV1 values, number of relapses, healthcare resources as hospitalizations due to asthma relapses, days of hospitalization, general practitioner (GP), specialist visits, and days of inactivity, were recorded over the study period together with the use of extra medications (systemic steroids and antibiotics). In order to compare the outcomes achieved in both groups, the propensity score matching method was used in STATA, and statistical significance was accepted for p < 0.05.

Results: Clinical data of 77 patients treated with B/F b.i.d (Group A) and of 40 patients treated with F/V 92/22 μg once-a-day (Group B) were selected. The PS-matching process, designed as matching on the baseline covariates, gender, age, FEV1 and comorbidities, returned a cohort of 40 group A patients of the entire cohort matched with 40 patients of group B, fully comparable for demographics and clinical characteristics. In the PS-matched cohort, the mean (±SE) number of relapses per patient during the follow-up was 0.53 (±0.12) in group A and 0.28 (±0.07) in group B. In group A, n = 25 (62.50 %), n = 9 (22.50 %), and n = 6 (15 %) patients had 0, 1, 2 relapses, respectively. In group B, n = 29 (72.50 %), and n = 11 (27.50 %) had 0 and 1 relapse, respectively. Over the study period, the average number of hospitalizations per patient was 0.15 (±0.06), with 0.28 (±0.12) days of hospitalization in group A, and 0.08 (±0.04) with 0.08 (±0.04) days of hospitalization in group B, respectively. The difference between the two groups in terms of FEV1(L) improvement vs baseline was 0.11 in favour of group B (p = 0.007). When results were compared, the improvement in lung function obtained in group B proved significantly higher both in terms of absolute FEV1 and of FEV1 % predicted. The mean (±SE) cost of hospitalizations per patient was € 345.30 (±133.23) in group A and € 172.65 (±98.18) in group B, respectively, with a mean not significant difference of - € 172.65 in favour of group B (p = 0.9). In particular, the mean (±SE) cost for visits per patient was € 26.82 (±3.73) in group A and € 11.36 (±2.30) in group B (p = 0.002), and the mean cost for rescue medications per patient was € 35.24 (±6.93) in group A, and € 18.73 (±3.38) in group B, respectively (p = 0.05).

Conclusions: Even if both ICS/LABA combinations were checked over a limited period of time, they seem characterized by a different profile in terms of effect on lung function and economic impact on mild-to-moderate asthma. The once-daily inhalation of combined Fluticasone furoate/Vilanterol 92/22 μg showed the potential for enhanced clinical outcomes and reduced costs when compared to Beclomethasone dipropionate/Formoterol 100/6 μg b.i.d.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糠酸氟替卡松/维拉托醇92/22μg每日一次与二丙酸倍氯米松/福莫特罗100/6μg b.i.d.:轻度至中度哮喘的12周成本分析。
背景:哮喘是国民健康服务的高费用疾病。最近用于治疗持续性支气管哮喘的两种LABA/ICS组合是通过Nexthaler装置给药的二丙酸倍氯米松/福莫特罗(B/F)和通过Ellipta装置给药的糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗(F/V)。据我们所知,在哮喘的成本分析方面还没有进行过比较。本单中心、观察性、回顾性研究的目的是从意大利国家卫生服务的角度,计算和比较在12周的治疗期间,每日服用一次B/F 100/6 μg的轻中度哮喘患者和每天服用一次F/V 92/22 μg的患者的成本。方法:数据从意大利维罗纳专科医疗中心(CEMS)肺科机构数据库自动匿名获取,UNI EN ISO 9001-2008验证。在研究期间记录FEV1值、哮喘复发次数、因哮喘复发而住院的医疗资源、住院天数、全科医生(GP)、专科就诊和不活动天数,以及额外药物(全身性类固醇和抗生素)的使用。为比较两组疗效,STATA采用倾向评分匹配法,p值具有统计学意义。结果:选取B/F双抗组77例患者(A组)和F/V 92/22 μg / d组40例患者(B组)的临床资料。ps匹配过程设计为对基线协变量、性别、年龄、FEV1和合并症进行匹配,将整个队列中的40名a组患者与40名B组患者进行匹配,在人口统计学和临床特征上完全可比。在ps匹配的队列中,随访期间每位患者复发的平均(±SE)数A组为0.53(±0.12)次,b组为0.28(±0.07)次。A组有25例(62.50%)、9例(22.50%)、6例(15%)患者分别有0、1、2次复发。B组29例(72.50%)复发,11例(27.50%)复发。研究期间,A组患者平均住院时间为0.15(±0.06)天,住院时间为0.28(±0.12)天;B组患者平均住院时间为0.08(±0.04)天,住院时间为0.08(±0.04)天。两组在FEV1(L)改善方面与基线相比的差异为0.11,有利于B组(p = 0.007)。当结果比较时,B组肺功能的改善在绝对FEV1和预测FEV1 %方面都被证明明显更高。A组每位患者的平均住院费用(±SE)分别为345.30欧元(±133.23)和172.65欧元(±98.18),B组平均无显著差异- 172.65欧元(p = 0.9)。特别是,A组每位患者就诊的平均(±SE)费用为26.82欧元(±3.73欧元),B组为11.36欧元(±2.30欧元)(p = 0.002), A组为35.24欧元(±6.93欧元),B组为18.73欧元(±3.38欧元)(p = 0.05)。结论:即使在有限的一段时间内检查ICS/LABA组合,它们在对肺功能的影响和对轻中度哮喘的经济影响方面似乎具有不同的特征。与二丙酸倍氯米松/福莫特罗100/6 μg / d相比,每日一次联合吸入糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗92/22 μg显示出增强临床结果和降低成本的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine is the official journal of the Italian Respiratory Society - Società Italiana di Pneumologia (IRS/SIP). The journal publishes on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related fields, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary and translational research. The interdisciplinary nature of the journal provides a unique opportunity for researchers, clinicians and healthcare professionals across specialties to collaborate and exchange information. The journal provides a high visibility platform for the publication and dissemination of top quality original scientific articles, reviews and important position papers documenting clinical and experimental advances.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of culture-negative subclinical pulmonary tuberculosis: a single-center observation. Effective treatment with oral Salbutamol on late onset respiratory impairment in a DOK7 Congenital Myasthenia Syndrome: a case report. Gas exchange abnormalities in Long COVID are driven by the alteration of the vascular component Usability of inhaler devices: a parameter currently misused Characteristics of inpatients with atopic asthma in a tertiary center: do age and gender have an influence?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1