Evaluating the Performance Improvement Preferences of Disability Service Managers: An Exploratory Study Using Gilbert's Behavior Engineering Model.

John R Wooderson, Monica Cuskelly, Kim A Meyer
{"title":"Evaluating the Performance Improvement Preferences of Disability Service Managers: An Exploratory Study Using Gilbert's Behavior Engineering Model.","authors":"John R Wooderson,&nbsp;Monica Cuskelly,&nbsp;Kim A Meyer","doi":"10.1111/jar.12260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Front-line managers play an important role in managing the performance of staff working in services for people with intellectual disability, but little is known about the practices they prefer to use to improve staff performance and whether these align with what research has shown to be effective.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study comprised two phases. First, the present authors tested the validity and reliability of a short questionnaire designed to evaluate managers' preferences for performance improvement practices. Then, the present authors collected and analysed responses from 175 managers working in disability services in Queensland, Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire demonstrated good content validity, concurrent validity and test-retest reliability. The participants believed strategies related to changing employee individual characteristics to be more effective than strategies aimed at improving environmental factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides important considerations regarding the professional development needs of front-line managers working in organizations that provide services to people with intellectual disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":73610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","volume":"30 4","pages":"661-671"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jar.12260","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Front-line managers play an important role in managing the performance of staff working in services for people with intellectual disability, but little is known about the practices they prefer to use to improve staff performance and whether these align with what research has shown to be effective.

Method: This study comprised two phases. First, the present authors tested the validity and reliability of a short questionnaire designed to evaluate managers' preferences for performance improvement practices. Then, the present authors collected and analysed responses from 175 managers working in disability services in Queensland, Australia.

Results: The questionnaire demonstrated good content validity, concurrent validity and test-retest reliability. The participants believed strategies related to changing employee individual characteristics to be more effective than strategies aimed at improving environmental factors.

Conclusions: This study provides important considerations regarding the professional development needs of front-line managers working in organizations that provide services to people with intellectual disability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残障服务管理者绩效改进偏好评估:基于吉尔伯特行为工程模型的探索性研究。
背景:一线管理者在管理为智障人士服务的员工的绩效方面发挥着重要作用,但他们倾向于使用哪些做法来提高员工绩效,以及这些做法是否与研究显示的有效方法相一致,我们知之甚少。方法:本研究分为两个阶段。首先,本文作者测试了一份简短问卷的有效性和可靠性,该问卷旨在评估管理者对绩效改进实践的偏好。然后,本文作者收集并分析了澳大利亚昆士兰州175名从事残疾服务的管理人员的回答。结果:问卷具有良好的内容效度、并发效度和重测信度。参与者认为与改变员工个人特征相关的策略比旨在改善环境因素的策略更有效。结论:本研究为智障人士服务机构一线管理人员的专业发展需求提供了重要的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Burnout Among Staff Working in Services for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Outcomes of a Creative Ability-Based Intervention: Advancing Independence in Learners With Severe Intellectual Disability. Childhood and Adulthood Predictors of Community Participation by Autistic Adults With and Without Intellectual Disability. "They Don't Understand People With Learning Disabilities": Exploring the Experiences of People With Intellectual Disabilities Undergoing Welfare Assessments. Parental Experiences of Quality of Life When Caring for Their Children With Intellectual Disability: A Meta-Aggregation Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1