Determinants of Grip Strength in Tunisian Nurses: A Bicentric Study.

IF 4.2 Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Recent patents on inflammation & allergy drug discovery Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1872213x10666160607125547
Irtyah Merchaoui, Lamia Bouzgarrou, Charfeddine Amri, Mohamed Akrout, Jacques Malchaire, Sana El Mhamdi, Neila Chaari
{"title":"Determinants of Grip Strength in Tunisian Nurses: A Bicentric Study.","authors":"Irtyah Merchaoui,&nbsp;Lamia Bouzgarrou,&nbsp;Charfeddine Amri,&nbsp;Mohamed Akrout,&nbsp;Jacques Malchaire,&nbsp;Sana El Mhamdi,&nbsp;Neila Chaari","doi":"10.2174/1872213x10666160607125547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Grip muscle force has always been used to assess functional limitations in elderly. Its use as a tool to assess work capacity has never been described in the literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the patent determinants of grip strength and the usefulness of its measurement in assessing workability index in the healthcare sector.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study conducted in a sample of 293 healthcare workers representative of 1181 based on a comprehensive questionnaire about socio-professional characteristics and on an 8-item work capacity evaluation (WAI). Besides, Body mass index was measured and muscle strength was assessed by JAMAR hydraulic dynamometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Handgrip Strength was stronger in male nurses (p < 0.001), with low perceived physical load (p = 0.0001) and working on a night shift (p = 0.001). It decreased with a greater duration of household work (p < 0.0001) and increased with a greater BMI (p = 0.015) and a better workability index (p < 0.0001). After removal of all the variables that were not independently associated with the muscle strength force, factors accounting for 52.6% of the variance in nurses handgrip strength were gender (p < 0.001), workability index (p < 0.001), duration of household work (p = 0.021), BMI (p = 0.002), perceived physical load (p < 0.001) and work schedule (p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Grip Strength Test is a useful tool to assess strength and functional capacity at work in healthcare workers. Further longitudinal studies are required to confirm this hypothesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20960,"journal":{"name":"Recent patents on inflammation & allergy drug discovery","volume":"10 1","pages":"54-60"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1872213x10666160607125547","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent patents on inflammation & allergy drug discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1872213x10666160607125547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Grip muscle force has always been used to assess functional limitations in elderly. Its use as a tool to assess work capacity has never been described in the literature.

Objective: To describe the patent determinants of grip strength and the usefulness of its measurement in assessing workability index in the healthcare sector.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted in a sample of 293 healthcare workers representative of 1181 based on a comprehensive questionnaire about socio-professional characteristics and on an 8-item work capacity evaluation (WAI). Besides, Body mass index was measured and muscle strength was assessed by JAMAR hydraulic dynamometer.

Results: Handgrip Strength was stronger in male nurses (p < 0.001), with low perceived physical load (p = 0.0001) and working on a night shift (p = 0.001). It decreased with a greater duration of household work (p < 0.0001) and increased with a greater BMI (p = 0.015) and a better workability index (p < 0.0001). After removal of all the variables that were not independently associated with the muscle strength force, factors accounting for 52.6% of the variance in nurses handgrip strength were gender (p < 0.001), workability index (p < 0.001), duration of household work (p = 0.021), BMI (p = 0.002), perceived physical load (p < 0.001) and work schedule (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Grip Strength Test is a useful tool to assess strength and functional capacity at work in healthcare workers. Further longitudinal studies are required to confirm this hypothesis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
突尼斯护士握力的决定因素:双中心研究。
背景:握力一直被用来评估老年人的功能限制。它作为一种评估工作能力的工具在文献中从未被描述过。目的:描述握力的专利决定因素及其测量在医疗保健部门评估可操作性指数的有用性。方法:采用8项工作能力评估(WAI)和社会专业特征综合调查问卷,对293名卫生保健工作者(其中1181人)进行横断面研究。测量体重指数,用JAMAR水力测功仪测定肌力。结果:男性护士的握力较强(p < 0.001),其感知体力负荷较低(p = 0.0001),且工作于夜班(p = 0.001)。随家务劳动时间的延长而降低(p < 0.0001),随BMI的增加(p = 0.015)和工作性指数的提高(p < 0.0001)而增加。在剔除所有与肌力力不独立相关的变量后,占护士握力方差52.6%的因素是性别(p < 0.001)、可操作性指数(p < 0.001)、家务劳动时间(p = 0.021)、体重指数(p = 0.002)、感知体力负荷(p < 0.001)和工作安排(p = 0.002)。结论:握力测试是一种评估医护人员工作时力量和功能能力的有效工具。需要进一步的纵向研究来证实这一假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Recent Patents on Inflammation & Allergy Drug Discovery publishes review articles by experts on recent patents in the field of inflammation and allergy drug discovery e.g. on novel bioactive compounds, analogs and targets. A selection of important and recent patents in the field is also included in the journal. The journal is essential reading for all researchers involved in inflammation and allergy drug design and discovery.
期刊最新文献
Meet Our Editorial Board Member Diagnosis of Allergic Reactions to Drugs Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Other Antimicrobial Drugs Biologics: Monoclonal Antibodies for Non-cancer Therapy, Cytokines, Fusion Proteins, Enzymes, and Hormones
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1