The Effectiveness of Gelfoam Technique before Percutaneous Vertebroplasy: Is It Helpful for Prevention of Cement Leakage? A Prospective Randomized Control Study.

Korean Journal of Spine Pub Date : 2016-06-01 Epub Date: 2016-06-30 DOI:10.14245/kjs.2016.13.2.63
Jae-Sang Oh, Jae-Won Doh, Jai-Joon Shim, Kyeong-Seok Lee, Seok-Mann Yoon, Hack-Gun Bae
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Gelfoam Technique before Percutaneous Vertebroplasy: Is It Helpful for Prevention of Cement Leakage? A Prospective Randomized Control Study.","authors":"Jae-Sang Oh,&nbsp;Jae-Won Doh,&nbsp;Jai-Joon Shim,&nbsp;Kyeong-Seok Lee,&nbsp;Seok-Mann Yoon,&nbsp;Hack-Gun Bae","doi":"10.14245/kjs.2016.13.2.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Preinjection gelfoam embolization during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) has been thought alternative technique to prevent the leakage of bone cement. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether the gelfoam techniques are useful to reduce bone cement leakage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Total 100 PVPs of osteoporotic spine compression fractures were performed by 1 spine surgeon who experienced more than 500 PVP cases under prospective control study. Operation was done in T-L junction (T10-L2) fractures with bi-transpedicular approach. Preinjection gelfoam PVP was done in the 50 levels. As control group, PVP without gelfoam was done in the 50 levels. We did not perform preoperative venography. We inserted normal saline-mixed gelfoam to the anterior third of vertebral body via PVP needle, and then 3mL of polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) was injected. We prospectively evaluated the incidence and leakage pattern of PMMA by postoperative computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between gelfoam and control groups, there were 11 leaks (22%) versus 12 leaks (26%). The mean operation time was 7.00 minutes versus 6.30 minutes. In gelfoam group, there were 6 spinal canal leaks, 4 paravertebral venous leaks, and 1 soft tissue leaks. In control group, there were 4 spinal canal leaks, 8 paravertebral venous leaks, and 1 disc space leak. In spite of cement leakage, there was no symptomatic case in both groups. Statistically, gelfoam technique was not related to decrease the incidence of leakage (p=0.64).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our prospective study showed that it did not significantly decrease cement leakage when vertebroplasty is performed by experienced spine surgeon.</p>","PeriodicalId":17867,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/c5/kjs-13-63.PMC4949169.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2016.13.2.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: Preinjection gelfoam embolization during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) has been thought alternative technique to prevent the leakage of bone cement. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether the gelfoam techniques are useful to reduce bone cement leakage.

Methods: Total 100 PVPs of osteoporotic spine compression fractures were performed by 1 spine surgeon who experienced more than 500 PVP cases under prospective control study. Operation was done in T-L junction (T10-L2) fractures with bi-transpedicular approach. Preinjection gelfoam PVP was done in the 50 levels. As control group, PVP without gelfoam was done in the 50 levels. We did not perform preoperative venography. We inserted normal saline-mixed gelfoam to the anterior third of vertebral body via PVP needle, and then 3mL of polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) was injected. We prospectively evaluated the incidence and leakage pattern of PMMA by postoperative computed tomography.

Results: Between gelfoam and control groups, there were 11 leaks (22%) versus 12 leaks (26%). The mean operation time was 7.00 minutes versus 6.30 minutes. In gelfoam group, there were 6 spinal canal leaks, 4 paravertebral venous leaks, and 1 soft tissue leaks. In control group, there were 4 spinal canal leaks, 8 paravertebral venous leaks, and 1 disc space leak. In spite of cement leakage, there was no symptomatic case in both groups. Statistically, gelfoam technique was not related to decrease the incidence of leakage (p=0.64).

Conclusion: Our prospective study showed that it did not significantly decrease cement leakage when vertebroplasty is performed by experienced spine surgeon.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮椎体成形术前明胶泡沫技术的有效性:是否有助于预防水泥渗漏?一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
目的:经皮椎体成形术中预注射明胶泡沫栓塞被认为是防止骨水泥渗漏的替代技术。本研究的目的是评估明胶泡沫技术是否有助于减少骨水泥渗漏。方法:在前瞻性对照研究中,由1名脊柱外科医生进行100例骨质疏松性脊柱压缩性骨折PVP手术。手术采用双经椎弓根入路治疗T-L交界(T10-L2)骨折。预注射明胶泡沫PVP在50个关卡中完成。不加明胶泡沫的PVP作为对照组,分50个关卡进行。术前未行静脉造影。我们通过PVP针将正常盐水混合明胶插入椎体前三分之一处,然后注射聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA) 3mL。我们通过术后计算机断层扫描前瞻性地评估PMMA的发生率和渗漏模式。结果:在明胶泡沫组和对照组之间,有11例(22%)渗漏,12例(26%)渗漏。平均手术时间分别为7.00分钟和6.30分钟。明胶泡沫组6例椎管渗漏,4例椎旁静脉渗漏,1例软组织渗漏。对照组4例椎管渗漏,8例椎旁静脉渗漏,1例椎间盘间隙渗漏。两组均未出现骨水泥渗漏的症状。统计上,明胶泡沫技术与减少渗漏发生率无关(p=0.64)。结论:我们的前瞻性研究表明,由经验丰富的脊柱外科医生进行椎体成形术并不能显著减少骨水泥渗漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Myelography in the Assessment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Its Influence on Surgical Management. Expressing Cobb Angle as Linear Measurement in Scoliosis and Its Significance: A Clinical and Geometrical Analysis of Scoliosis. Comparison of Cervical Alignment and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Os Odontoideum versus Non-Os Odontoideum after Atlantoaxial Fixation. Whole Spine Disc Degeneration Survey according to the Ages and Sex Using Pfirrmann Disc Degeneration Grades. Korean Journal of Spine, the Long History of Archives of Spine Academia and the Beginning of a New Era.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1