Effects of aging on the relationship between cognitive demand and step variability during dual-task walking.

AGE Pub Date : 2016-08-01 Epub Date: 2016-08-03 DOI:10.1007/s11357-016-9941-y
Leslie M Decker, Fabien Cignetti, Nathaniel Hunt, Jane F Potter, Nicholas Stergiou, Stephanie A Studenski
{"title":"Effects of aging on the relationship between cognitive demand and step variability during dual-task walking.","authors":"Leslie M Decker, Fabien Cignetti, Nathaniel Hunt, Jane F Potter, Nicholas Stergiou, Stephanie A Studenski","doi":"10.1007/s11357-016-9941-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A U-shaped relationship between cognitive demand and gait control may exist in dual-task situations, reflecting opposing effects of external focus of attention and attentional resource competition. The purpose of the study was twofold: to examine whether gait control, as evaluated from step-to-step variability, is related to cognitive task difficulty in a U-shaped manner and to determine whether age modifies this relationship. Young and older adults walked on a treadmill without attentional requirement and while performing a dichotic listening task under three attention conditions: non-forced (NF), forced-right (FR), and forced-left (FL). The conditions increased in their attentional demand and requirement for inhibitory control. Gait control was evaluated by the variability of step parameters related to balance control (step width) and rhythmic stepping pattern (step length and step time). A U-shaped relationship was found for step width variability in both young and older adults and for step time variability in older adults only. Cognitive performance during dual tasking was maintained in both young and older adults. The U-shaped relationship, which presumably results from a trade-off between an external focus of attention and competition for attentional resources, implies that higher-level cognitive processes are involved in walking in young and older adults. Specifically, while these processes are initially involved only in the control of (lateral) balance during gait, they become necessary for the control of (fore-aft) rhythmic stepping pattern in older adults, suggesting that attentional resources turn out to be needed in all facets of walking with aging. Finally, despite the cognitive resources required by walking, both young and older adults spontaneously adopted a \"posture second\" strategy, prioritizing the cognitive task over the gait task.</p>","PeriodicalId":7632,"journal":{"name":"AGE","volume":" ","pages":"363-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11357-016-9941-y","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AGE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-016-9941-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

A U-shaped relationship between cognitive demand and gait control may exist in dual-task situations, reflecting opposing effects of external focus of attention and attentional resource competition. The purpose of the study was twofold: to examine whether gait control, as evaluated from step-to-step variability, is related to cognitive task difficulty in a U-shaped manner and to determine whether age modifies this relationship. Young and older adults walked on a treadmill without attentional requirement and while performing a dichotic listening task under three attention conditions: non-forced (NF), forced-right (FR), and forced-left (FL). The conditions increased in their attentional demand and requirement for inhibitory control. Gait control was evaluated by the variability of step parameters related to balance control (step width) and rhythmic stepping pattern (step length and step time). A U-shaped relationship was found for step width variability in both young and older adults and for step time variability in older adults only. Cognitive performance during dual tasking was maintained in both young and older adults. The U-shaped relationship, which presumably results from a trade-off between an external focus of attention and competition for attentional resources, implies that higher-level cognitive processes are involved in walking in young and older adults. Specifically, while these processes are initially involved only in the control of (lateral) balance during gait, they become necessary for the control of (fore-aft) rhythmic stepping pattern in older adults, suggesting that attentional resources turn out to be needed in all facets of walking with aging. Finally, despite the cognitive resources required by walking, both young and older adults spontaneously adopted a "posture second" strategy, prioritizing the cognitive task over the gait task.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年龄对双任务步行认知需求与步长变异性关系的影响。
在双任务情境下,认知需求与步态控制之间可能存在u型关系,反映了外部注意焦点与注意资源竞争的相反作用。这项研究的目的有两个:检查步态控制是否与认知任务难度呈u型关系,并确定年龄是否会改变这种关系。年轻人和老年人在没有注意力要求的跑步机上行走,同时在三种注意力条件下执行二分聆听任务:非强迫(NF)、强迫向右(FR)和强迫向左(FL)。实验组的注意需求和抑制控制需求均有所增加。步态控制通过与平衡控制(步宽)和有节奏的步模式(步长和步时间)相关的步参数的可变性来评估。在年轻人和老年人中,步宽变异性呈u型关系,而在老年人中,步长变异性仅呈u型关系。在双重任务中,年轻人和老年人的认知表现都保持不变。这种u型关系可能是外部注意力集中和对注意力资源的竞争之间的权衡的结果,这意味着更高层次的认知过程与年轻人和老年人的行走有关。具体来说,虽然这些过程最初只参与控制步态中的(侧向)平衡,但它们对于老年人控制(前后)有节奏的步伐模式是必要的,这表明随着年龄的增长,注意力资源在行走的各个方面都是需要的。最后,尽管走路需要认知资源,年轻人和老年人都自发地采用了“姿势第二”策略,优先考虑认知任务而不是步态任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AGE
AGE 医学-老年医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
News & Views Aging in America Tinetti mobility test is related to muscle mass and strength in non-institutionalized elderly people. Age-associated vulval integrity is an important marker of nematode healthspan. Interspecific correlation between red blood cell mitochondrial ROS production, cardiolipin content and longevity in birds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1