Expressing Redundancy among Linear-Epitope Sequence Data Based on Residue-Level Physicochemical Similarity in the Context of Antigenic Cross-Reaction.

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Advances in Bioinformatics Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-05-04 DOI:10.1155/2016/1276594
Salvador Eugenio C Caoili
{"title":"Expressing Redundancy among Linear-Epitope Sequence Data Based on Residue-Level Physicochemical Similarity in the Context of Antigenic Cross-Reaction.","authors":"Salvador Eugenio C Caoili","doi":"10.1155/2016/1276594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epitope-based design of vaccines, immunotherapeutics, and immunodiagnostics is complicated by structural changes that radically alter immunological outcomes. This is obscured by expressing redundancy among linear-epitope data as fractional sequence-alignment identity, which fails to account for potentially drastic loss of binding affinity due to single-residue substitutions even where these might be considered conservative in the context of classical sequence analysis. From the perspective of immune function based on molecular recognition of epitopes, functional redundancy of epitope data (FRED) thus may be defined in a biologically more meaningful way based on residue-level physicochemical similarity in the context of antigenic cross-reaction, with functional similarity between epitopes expressed as the Shannon information entropy for differential epitope binding. Such similarity may be estimated in terms of structural differences between an immunogen epitope and an antigen epitope with reference to an idealized binding site of high complementarity to the immunogen epitope, by analogy between protein folding and ligand-receptor binding; but this underestimates potential for cross-reactivity, suggesting that epitope-binding site complementarity is typically suboptimal as regards immunologic specificity. The apparently suboptimal complementarity may reflect a tradeoff to attain optimal immune function that favors generation of immune-system components each having potential for cross-reactivity with a variety of epitopes. </p>","PeriodicalId":39059,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Bioinformatics","volume":"2016 ","pages":"1276594"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/1276594","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1276594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Epitope-based design of vaccines, immunotherapeutics, and immunodiagnostics is complicated by structural changes that radically alter immunological outcomes. This is obscured by expressing redundancy among linear-epitope data as fractional sequence-alignment identity, which fails to account for potentially drastic loss of binding affinity due to single-residue substitutions even where these might be considered conservative in the context of classical sequence analysis. From the perspective of immune function based on molecular recognition of epitopes, functional redundancy of epitope data (FRED) thus may be defined in a biologically more meaningful way based on residue-level physicochemical similarity in the context of antigenic cross-reaction, with functional similarity between epitopes expressed as the Shannon information entropy for differential epitope binding. Such similarity may be estimated in terms of structural differences between an immunogen epitope and an antigen epitope with reference to an idealized binding site of high complementarity to the immunogen epitope, by analogy between protein folding and ligand-receptor binding; but this underestimates potential for cross-reactivity, suggesting that epitope-binding site complementarity is typically suboptimal as regards immunologic specificity. The apparently suboptimal complementarity may reflect a tradeoff to attain optimal immune function that favors generation of immune-system components each having potential for cross-reactivity with a variety of epitopes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗原交叉反应中基于残差级物理化学相似性的线性表位序列数据冗余表达。
基于表位的疫苗、免疫疗法和免疫诊断设计因结构变化而复杂化,这些结构变化从根本上改变了免疫结果。通过将线性表位数据之间的冗余表达为分数序列比对身份,这一点被掩盖了,这无法解释由于单残基替换而导致的潜在的剧烈结合亲和力损失,即使这些在经典序列分析的背景下可能被认为是保守的。因此,从基于表位分子识别的免疫功能的角度来看,表位数据的功能冗余(FRED)可以在抗原交叉反应背景下基于残基水平的物理化学相似性以更有生物学意义的方式定义,表位之间的功能相似性表示为差异表位结合的Shannon信息熵。这种相似性可以通过类比蛋白质折叠和配体受体结合,根据与免疫原表位具有高度互补性的理想结合位点的免疫原表位和抗原表位之间的结构差异来估计;但这低估了交叉反应的潜力,表明表位结合位点的互补性在免疫特异性方面通常是次优的。这种明显的次优互补性可能反映了为了获得最佳免疫功能而进行的权衡,这种权衡有利于产生免疫系统成分,每个成分都具有与各种表位交叉反应的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Bioinformatics
Advances in Bioinformatics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computational Genomics A Guide to RNAseq Data Analysis Using Bioinformatics Approaches Computational Metabolomics Bioinformatics in Personalized Medicine Bioinformatics Tools for Gene and Genome Annotation Analysis of Microbes for Synthetic Biology and Cancer Biology Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1