ANNOTATION TAKEN, IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF CRIMINAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, AS WELL AS IN CRIMINOLOGY, TO THE DECISION OF THE PORTUGUESE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, OF JANUARY 13, 2011--WITH RESPECT TO THE PROBLEMS OF "CONSENT" AND "MEDICAL ACT".
{"title":"ANNOTATION TAKEN, IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF CRIMINAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, AS WELL AS IN CRIMINOLOGY, TO THE DECISION OF THE PORTUGUESE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, OF JANUARY 13, 2011--WITH RESPECT TO THE PROBLEMS OF \"CONSENT\" AND \"MEDICAL ACT\".","authors":"Gonçalo S de Melo Bandeira","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>1--Summary of the decision taken by the Portuguese Constitutional Court, of January 13, 2011; 2--Complete text of the decision of the Portuguese Constitutional Court, of January 13, 2011, Judge Maria João ANTUNES (Reporter), Judge Carlos Pamplona de OLIVEIRA, Judge José Borges SOEIRO, Judge Gil GALVÃO, Judge Rui Manuel Moura RAMOS (President)--in terms of the appositive declaration to the sentence n. 487/2010: t.c.http://www. tribunalconstitucional.pt, August 1, 2011; 3--Brief annotation to the problem of the \"medical act\"; 3.1--Plus some conclusions on the brief annotation to the problem of the \"medical act\"; 3.2--Brief annotation to the problem of \"consent\"--continuation of the previous comments; 4--Conclusions. It must never be forgotten that \"consent\" does not stand as the only cause of exclusion of unlawfulness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54182,"journal":{"name":"MEDICINE AND LAW","volume":"33 2","pages":"57-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDICINE AND LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
1--Summary of the decision taken by the Portuguese Constitutional Court, of January 13, 2011; 2--Complete text of the decision of the Portuguese Constitutional Court, of January 13, 2011, Judge Maria João ANTUNES (Reporter), Judge Carlos Pamplona de OLIVEIRA, Judge José Borges SOEIRO, Judge Gil GALVÃO, Judge Rui Manuel Moura RAMOS (President)--in terms of the appositive declaration to the sentence n. 487/2010: t.c.http://www. tribunalconstitucional.pt, August 1, 2011; 3--Brief annotation to the problem of the "medical act"; 3.1--Plus some conclusions on the brief annotation to the problem of the "medical act"; 3.2--Brief annotation to the problem of "consent"--continuation of the previous comments; 4--Conclusions. It must never be forgotten that "consent" does not stand as the only cause of exclusion of unlawfulness.
1-葡萄牙宪法法院于2011年1月13日作出的决定摘要;2——葡萄牙宪法法院2011年1月13日Maria jo o ANTUNES法官(记者)、Carlos Pamplona de OLIVEIRA法官、josessere Borges SOEIRO法官、Gil法官GALVÃO、Rui Manuel Moura RAMOS法官(庭长)关于第487/2010号判决的赞成声明的决定全文:http://www。宪法法庭,2011年8月1日;3——对“医疗行为”问题的简要注解;3.1——对“医疗行为”问题的简要注释加上一些结论;3.2——对“同意”问题的简要注释——延续前面的评论;4——结论。绝不能忘记,“同意”不是排除非法行为的唯一原因。