A unique method for estimating the reliability learning curve of optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound measurement.

IF 3.6 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Critical Ultrasound Journal Pub Date : 2016-12-01 Epub Date: 2016-08-08 DOI:10.1186/s13089-016-0044-x
Frederick A Zeiler, Markus T Ziesmann, Patrick Goeres, Bertram Unger, Jason Park, Dimitrios Karakitsos, Michael Blaivas, Ashley Vergis, Lawrence M Gillman
{"title":"A unique method for estimating the reliability learning curve of optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound measurement.","authors":"Frederick A Zeiler,&nbsp;Markus T Ziesmann,&nbsp;Patrick Goeres,&nbsp;Bertram Unger,&nbsp;Jason Park,&nbsp;Dimitrios Karakitsos,&nbsp;Michael Blaivas,&nbsp;Ashley Vergis,&nbsp;Lawrence M Gillman","doi":"10.1186/s13089-016-0044-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement using ultrasound has been proposed as a rapid, non-invasive, point of care technique to estimate intra-cranial pressure (ICP). Ultrasonic measurement of the optic nerve sheath can be quite challenging and there is limited literature surrounding learning curves for this technique. We attempted to develop a method to estimate the reliability learning curve for ONSD measurement utilizing a unique definition of reliability: a plateau in within-subject variability with unchanged between-subject variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a previously published study, a single operator measured the ONSD in 120 healthy volunteers over a 6-month period. Utilizing the assumption that the four measurements made on each subject during this study should be equal, the relationship of within-subject variance was described using a quadratic-plateau model as assessed by segmental polynomial (knot) regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Segmental polynomial (knot) regression revealed a plateau in within-subject variance after the 21st subject. However, there was no difference in overall mean values [3.69 vs 3.68 mm (p = 0.884)] or between-subject variance [14.49 vs 11.92 (p = 0.54)] above or below this cutoff.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests a significant finite learning curve associated with ONSD measurements. It also offers a unique method of calculating the learning curve associated with ONSD measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":46598,"journal":{"name":"Critical Ultrasound Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13089-016-0044-x","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-016-0044-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Background: Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement using ultrasound has been proposed as a rapid, non-invasive, point of care technique to estimate intra-cranial pressure (ICP). Ultrasonic measurement of the optic nerve sheath can be quite challenging and there is limited literature surrounding learning curves for this technique. We attempted to develop a method to estimate the reliability learning curve for ONSD measurement utilizing a unique definition of reliability: a plateau in within-subject variability with unchanged between-subject variability.

Methods: As part of a previously published study, a single operator measured the ONSD in 120 healthy volunteers over a 6-month period. Utilizing the assumption that the four measurements made on each subject during this study should be equal, the relationship of within-subject variance was described using a quadratic-plateau model as assessed by segmental polynomial (knot) regression.

Results: Segmental polynomial (knot) regression revealed a plateau in within-subject variance after the 21st subject. However, there was no difference in overall mean values [3.69 vs 3.68 mm (p = 0.884)] or between-subject variance [14.49 vs 11.92 (p = 0.54)] above or below this cutoff.

Conclusions: This study suggests a significant finite learning curve associated with ONSD measurements. It also offers a unique method of calculating the learning curve associated with ONSD measurement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种独特的视神经鞘直径超声测量可靠性学习曲线估计方法。
背景:视神经鞘直径(ONSD)测量超声已被提出作为一种快速,无创,点护理技术来估计颅内压(ICP)。视神经鞘的超声测量是相当具有挑战性的,并且关于该技术的学习曲线的文献有限。我们试图开发一种方法,利用独特的可靠性定义来估计ONSD测量的可靠性学习曲线:受试者内部变异性的平台,受试者之间的变异性不变。方法:作为先前发表的一项研究的一部分,一名操作员在6个月的时间里测量了120名健康志愿者的ONSD。假设在本研究中对每个受试者进行的四次测量应该是相等的,受试者内方差的关系使用二次平台模型进行描述,并通过分段多项式(结)回归进行评估。结果:分段多项式(knot)回归显示,在第21个受试者之后,受试者内方差呈平台期。然而,总体平均值[3.69 vs 3.68 mm (p = 0.884)]或受试者间方差[14.49 vs 11.92 (p = 0.54)]高于或低于该截止值均无差异。结论:这项研究表明,与ONSD测量相关的学习曲线是有限的。它还提供了一种独特的方法来计算与ONSD测量相关的学习曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Ultrasound Journal
Critical Ultrasound Journal RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Point-of-care ultrasound evaluation and puncture simulation of the internal jugular vein by medical students. Interpretation errors in focused cardiac ultrasound by novice pediatric emergency medicine fellow sonologists. Mitral valve velocity time integral and passive leg raise as a measure of volume responsiveness. Diagnostic performance of abdominal point of care ultrasound performed by an emergency physician in acute right iliac fossa pain. Strain analysis for the identification of hypertensive cardiac end-organ damage in the emergency department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1