Laboratory Response to Ebola - West Africa and United States.

Q1 Medicine MMWR supplements Pub Date : 2016-07-08 DOI:10.15585/mmwr.su6503a7
Tara K Sealy, Bobbie R Erickson, Céline H Taboy, Ute Ströher, Jonathan S Towner, Sharon E Andrews, Laura E Rose, Elizabeth Weirich, Luis Lowe, John D Klena, Christina F Spiropoulou, Mark A Rayfield, Brian H Bird
{"title":"Laboratory Response to Ebola - West Africa and United States.","authors":"Tara K Sealy,&nbsp;Bobbie R Erickson,&nbsp;Céline H Taboy,&nbsp;Ute Ströher,&nbsp;Jonathan S Towner,&nbsp;Sharon E Andrews,&nbsp;Laura E Rose,&nbsp;Elizabeth Weirich,&nbsp;Luis Lowe,&nbsp;John D Klena,&nbsp;Christina F Spiropoulou,&nbsp;Mark A Rayfield,&nbsp;Brian H Bird","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.su6503a7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2014-2016 Ebola virus disease (Ebola) epidemic in West Africa highlighted the need to maintain organized laboratory systems or networks that can be effectively reorganized to implement new diagnostic strategies and laboratory services in response to large-scale events. Although previous Ebola outbreaks enabled establishment of critical laboratory practice safeguards and diagnostic procedures, this Ebola outbreak in West Africa highlighted the need for planning and preparedness activities that are better adapted to emerging pathogens or to pathogens that have attracted little commercial interest. The crisis underscored the need for better mechanisms to streamline development and evaluation of new diagnostic assays, transfer of material and specimens between countries and organizations, and improved processes for rapidly deploying health workers with specific laboratory expertise. The challenges and events of the outbreak forced laboratorians to examine not only the comprehensive capacities of existing national laboratory systems to recognize and respond to events, but also their sustainability over time and the mechanisms that need to be pre-established to ensure effective response. Critical to this assessment was the recognition of how response activities (i.e., infrastructure support, logistics, and workforce supplementation) can be used or repurposed to support the strengthening of national laboratory systems during the postevent transition to capacity building and recovery. This report compares CDC's domestic and international laboratory response engagements and lessons learned that can improve future responses in support of the International Health Regulations and Global Health Security Agenda initiatives.The activities summarized in this report would not have been possible without collaboration with many U.S. and international partners (http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014-west-africa/partners.html). </p>","PeriodicalId":37858,"journal":{"name":"MMWR supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MMWR supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.su6503a7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

The 2014-2016 Ebola virus disease (Ebola) epidemic in West Africa highlighted the need to maintain organized laboratory systems or networks that can be effectively reorganized to implement new diagnostic strategies and laboratory services in response to large-scale events. Although previous Ebola outbreaks enabled establishment of critical laboratory practice safeguards and diagnostic procedures, this Ebola outbreak in West Africa highlighted the need for planning and preparedness activities that are better adapted to emerging pathogens or to pathogens that have attracted little commercial interest. The crisis underscored the need for better mechanisms to streamline development and evaluation of new diagnostic assays, transfer of material and specimens between countries and organizations, and improved processes for rapidly deploying health workers with specific laboratory expertise. The challenges and events of the outbreak forced laboratorians to examine not only the comprehensive capacities of existing national laboratory systems to recognize and respond to events, but also their sustainability over time and the mechanisms that need to be pre-established to ensure effective response. Critical to this assessment was the recognition of how response activities (i.e., infrastructure support, logistics, and workforce supplementation) can be used or repurposed to support the strengthening of national laboratory systems during the postevent transition to capacity building and recovery. This report compares CDC's domestic and international laboratory response engagements and lessons learned that can improve future responses in support of the International Health Regulations and Global Health Security Agenda initiatives.The activities summarized in this report would not have been possible without collaboration with many U.S. and international partners (http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014-west-africa/partners.html).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实验室对埃博拉病毒的反应——西非和美国。
2014-2016年西非埃博拉病毒病(埃博拉)流行突出表明,需要维持有组织的实验室系统或网络,这些系统或网络可以进行有效重组,以实施新的诊断战略和实验室服务,以应对大规模事件。虽然以前的埃博拉疫情能够建立关键的实验室操作保障措施和诊断程序,但西非的这次埃博拉疫情突出表明,需要规划和防备活动,以便更好地适应新出现的病原体或很少引起商业兴趣的病原体。这场危机突出表明,需要建立更好的机制,以简化新的诊断分析方法的开发和评估,在国家和组织之间转移材料和标本,并改进快速部署具有特定实验室专业知识的卫生工作者的程序。疫情的挑战和事件迫使实验室人员不仅要审查现有国家实验室系统识别和应对事件的综合能力,还要审查其长期的可持续性以及需要预先建立的机制,以确保有效应对。这一评估的关键是认识到如何利用或重新利用应对活动(即基础设施支持、后勤和劳动力补充),以支持在灾后向能力建设和恢复过渡期间加强国家实验室系统。本报告比较了疾病预防控制中心的国内和国际实验室反应参与情况以及可以改进未来反应以支持《国际卫生条例》和《全球卫生安全议程》倡议的经验教训。如果没有与许多美国和国际伙伴的合作,本报告所概述的活动是不可能实现的(http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014-west-africa/partners.html)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MMWR supplements
MMWR supplements Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
48.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR ) series is prepared by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Often called “the voice of CDC,” the MMWR series is the agency’s primary vehicle for scientific publication of timely, reliable, authoritative, accurate, objective, and useful public health information and recommendations. MMWR readership predominantly consists of physicians, nurses, public health practitioners, epidemiologists and other scientists, researchers, educators, and laboratorians.
期刊最新文献
Adult Caretaker Engagement and School Connectedness and Association with Substance Use, Indicators of Emotional Well-Being and Suicide Risk, and Experiences with Violence Among American Indian or Alaska Native High School Students - Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2023. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Health Conditions and Risk Behaviors Among High School Students - Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2023. Asking for Verbal Sexual Consent and Experiences of Sexual Violence and Sexual Behaviors Among High School Students - Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2023. Disparities in School Connectedness, Unstable Housing, Experiences of Violence, Mental Health, and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors Among Transgender and Cisgender High School Students - Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2023. Experiences of Racism in School and Associations with Mental Health, Suicide Risk, and Substance Use Among High School Students - Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1