Consensus on surgical aspects of managing osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot.

Q1 Health Professions Diabetic Foot & Ankle Pub Date : 2016-07-12 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.3402/dfa.v7.30079
Sachin Allahabadi, Kareem B Haroun, Daniel M Musher, Benjamin A Lipsky, Neal R Barshes
{"title":"Consensus on surgical aspects of managing osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot.","authors":"Sachin Allahabadi,&nbsp;Kareem B Haroun,&nbsp;Daniel M Musher,&nbsp;Benjamin A Lipsky,&nbsp;Neal R Barshes","doi":"10.3402/dfa.v7.30079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop consensus statements that may help share or even establish 'best practices' in the surgical aspects of managing diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) that can be applied in appropriate clinical situations pending the publication of more high-quality data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We asked 14 panelists with expertise in DFO management to participate. Delphi methodology was used to develop consensus statements. First, a questionnaire elicited practices and beliefs concerning various aspects of the surgical management of DFO. Thereafter, we constructed 63 statements for analysis and, using a nine-point Likert scale, asked the panelists to indicate the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with the statements. We defined consensus as a mean score of greater than 7.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panelists reached consensus on 38 items after three rounds. Among these, seven provide guidance on initial diagnosis of DFO and selection of patients for surgical management. Another 15 statements provide guidance on specific aspects of operative management, including the timing of operations and the type of specimens to be obtained. Ten statements provide guidance on postoperative management, including wound closure and offloading, and six statements summarize the panelists' agreement on general principles for surgical management of DFO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consensus statement on the perioperative management of DFO were formed with an expert panel comprised of a variety of surgical specialties. We believe these statements may serve as 'best practice' guidelines until properly performed studies provide more robust evidence to support or refute specific surgical management steps in DFO.</p>","PeriodicalId":45385,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Foot & Ankle","volume":"7 ","pages":"30079"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3402/dfa.v7.30079","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Foot & Ankle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/dfa.v7.30079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to develop consensus statements that may help share or even establish 'best practices' in the surgical aspects of managing diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) that can be applied in appropriate clinical situations pending the publication of more high-quality data.

Methods: We asked 14 panelists with expertise in DFO management to participate. Delphi methodology was used to develop consensus statements. First, a questionnaire elicited practices and beliefs concerning various aspects of the surgical management of DFO. Thereafter, we constructed 63 statements for analysis and, using a nine-point Likert scale, asked the panelists to indicate the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with the statements. We defined consensus as a mean score of greater than 7.0.

Results: The panelists reached consensus on 38 items after three rounds. Among these, seven provide guidance on initial diagnosis of DFO and selection of patients for surgical management. Another 15 statements provide guidance on specific aspects of operative management, including the timing of operations and the type of specimens to be obtained. Ten statements provide guidance on postoperative management, including wound closure and offloading, and six statements summarize the panelists' agreement on general principles for surgical management of DFO.

Conclusions: Consensus statement on the perioperative management of DFO were formed with an expert panel comprised of a variety of surgical specialties. We believe these statements may serve as 'best practice' guidelines until properly performed studies provide more robust evidence to support or refute specific surgical management steps in DFO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病足骨髓炎手术治疗的共识。
背景:本研究的目的是发展共识声明,可能有助于分享甚至建立治疗糖尿病足骨髓炎(DFO)手术方面的“最佳实践”,这些实践可以在适当的临床情况下应用,等待更多高质量数据的发表。方法:我们邀请了14位具有DFO管理专业知识的小组成员参加。采用德尔菲法制定共识声明。首先,问卷调查引出了关于DFO手术处理各个方面的实践和信念。此后,我们构建了63个陈述进行分析,并使用9分李克特量表,要求小组成员指出他们同意或不同意这些陈述的程度。我们将共识定义为平均得分大于7.0。结果:经过三轮讨论,与会专家就38项议题达成共识。其中7篇为DFO的初步诊断和手术治疗患者的选择提供指导。另外15项声明对手术管理的具体方面提供了指导,包括手术时间和要获得的标本类型。10项声明提供了术后处理的指导,包括伤口关闭和卸载,6项声明总结了专家组成员对DFO手术处理一般原则的一致意见。结论:DFO围手术期处理的共识声明是由各种外科专业组成的专家小组形成的。我们相信这些陈述可以作为“最佳实践”指南,直到适当的研究提供更有力的证据来支持或反驳DFO的特定手术处理步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetic Foot & Ankle
Diabetic Foot & Ankle ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Limb salvage in diabetic patients with no-option critical limb ischemia: outcomes of a specialized center experience. Serum vitamin D and diabetic foot complications. Diabetes-related foot disorders among adult Ghanaians. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the human recombinant epidermal growth factor in the management of patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetic foot ulcer outcomes from a podiatry led tertiary service in Kuwait.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1