Longitudinal models of reading achievement of students with learning disabilities and without disabilities.

Amanda L Sullivan, Nidhi Kohli, Elyse M Farnsworth, Shanna Sadeh, Leila Jones
{"title":"Longitudinal models of reading achievement of students with learning disabilities and without disabilities.","authors":"Amanda L Sullivan,&nbsp;Nidhi Kohli,&nbsp;Elyse M Farnsworth,&nbsp;Shanna Sadeh,&nbsp;Leila Jones","doi":"10.1037/spq0000170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accurate estimation of developmental trajectories can inform instruction and intervention. We compared the fit of linear, quadratic, and piecewise mixed-effects models of reading development among students with learning disabilities relative to their typically developing peers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We drew an analytic sample of 1,990 students from the nationally representative Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort of 1998, using reading achievement scores from kindergarten through eighth grade to estimate three models of students' reading growth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The piecewise mixed-effects models provided the best functional form of the students' reading trajectories as indicated by model fit indices. Results showed slightly different trajectories between students with learning disabilities and without disabilities, with varying but divergent rates of growth throughout elementary grades, as well as an increasing gap over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results highlight the need for additional research on appropriate methods for modeling reading trajectories and the implications for students' response to instruction. (PsycINFO Database Record</p>","PeriodicalId":88124,"journal":{"name":"School psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association","volume":"32 3","pages":"336-349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Objective: Accurate estimation of developmental trajectories can inform instruction and intervention. We compared the fit of linear, quadratic, and piecewise mixed-effects models of reading development among students with learning disabilities relative to their typically developing peers.

Method: We drew an analytic sample of 1,990 students from the nationally representative Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort of 1998, using reading achievement scores from kindergarten through eighth grade to estimate three models of students' reading growth.

Results: The piecewise mixed-effects models provided the best functional form of the students' reading trajectories as indicated by model fit indices. Results showed slightly different trajectories between students with learning disabilities and without disabilities, with varying but divergent rates of growth throughout elementary grades, as well as an increasing gap over time.

Conclusions: These results highlight the need for additional research on appropriate methods for modeling reading trajectories and the implications for students' response to instruction. (PsycINFO Database Record

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习障碍与非学习障碍学生阅读成绩的纵向模型。
目的:准确估计发育轨迹,为指导和干预提供依据。我们比较了线性、二次和分段混合效应模型对学习障碍学生阅读发展的影响。方法:我们从1998年具有全国代表性的幼儿纵向研究-幼儿园队列中抽取1990名学生作为分析样本,使用幼儿园至八年级的阅读成就分数来估计学生阅读增长的三种模型。结果:分段混合效应模型提供了学生阅读轨迹的最佳函数形式。结果显示,有学习障碍的学生和没有学习障碍的学生之间的发展轨迹略有不同,在整个小学阶段,他们的成长速度不同,但有所不同,而且随着时间的推移,差距越来越大。结论:这些结果表明,需要进一步研究适当的阅读轨迹建模方法及其对学生教学反应的影响。(PsycINFO数据库记录
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teacher and student race as a predictor for negative feedback during instruction. Fostering youth self-efficacy to address transgender and racial diversity issues: The role of gay-straight alliances. The big two personality traits and adolescents' complete mental health: The mediation role of perceived school stress. Examining the stability of social, emotional, and behavioral risk status: Implications for screening frequency. Developing a direct rating behavior scale for depression in middle school students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1