Artificial Neural Networks for Early Prediction of Mortality in Patients with Non Variceal Upper GI Bleeding (UGIB).

Biomedical informatics insights Pub Date : 2008-06-24 eCollection Date: 2008-01-01 DOI:10.4137/bii.s814
Enzo Grossi, Riccardo Marmo, Marco Intraligi, Massimo Buscema
{"title":"Artificial Neural Networks for Early Prediction of Mortality in Patients with Non Variceal Upper GI Bleeding (UGIB).","authors":"Enzo Grossi,&nbsp;Riccardo Marmo,&nbsp;Marco Intraligi,&nbsp;Massimo Buscema","doi":"10.4137/bii.s814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mortality for non variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is clinically relevant in the first 12-24 hours of the onset of haemorrhage and therefore identification of clinical factors predictive of the risk of death before endoscopic examination may allow for early corrective therapeutic intervention.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>1) Identify simple and early clinical variables predictive of the risk of death in patients with non variceal UGIB; 2) assess previsional gain of a predictive model developed with conventional statistics vs. that developed with artificial neural networks (ANNs).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Analysis was performed on 807 patients with nonvariceal UGIB (527 males, 280 females), as a part of a multicentre Italian study. The mortality was considered \"bleeding-related\" if occurred within 30 days from the index bleeding episode. A total of 50 independent variables were analysed, 49 of which clinico-anamnestic, all collected prior to endoscopic examination plus the haemoglobin value measured on admission in the emergency department. Death occurred in 42 (5.2%). Conventional statistical techniques (linear discriminant analysis) were compared with ANNs (Twist® system-Semeion) adopting the same result validation protocol with random allocation of the sample in training and testing subsets and subsequent cross-over. ANNs resulted to be significantly more accurate than LDA with an overall accuracy rate near to 90%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Artificial neural networks technology is highly promising in the development of accurate diagnostic tools designed to recognize patients at high risk of death for UGIB.</p>","PeriodicalId":88397,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical informatics insights","volume":"1 ","pages":"7-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/bii.s814","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical informatics insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/bii.s814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Mortality for non variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is clinically relevant in the first 12-24 hours of the onset of haemorrhage and therefore identification of clinical factors predictive of the risk of death before endoscopic examination may allow for early corrective therapeutic intervention.

Aim: 1) Identify simple and early clinical variables predictive of the risk of death in patients with non variceal UGIB; 2) assess previsional gain of a predictive model developed with conventional statistics vs. that developed with artificial neural networks (ANNs).

Methods and results: Analysis was performed on 807 patients with nonvariceal UGIB (527 males, 280 females), as a part of a multicentre Italian study. The mortality was considered "bleeding-related" if occurred within 30 days from the index bleeding episode. A total of 50 independent variables were analysed, 49 of which clinico-anamnestic, all collected prior to endoscopic examination plus the haemoglobin value measured on admission in the emergency department. Death occurred in 42 (5.2%). Conventional statistical techniques (linear discriminant analysis) were compared with ANNs (Twist® system-Semeion) adopting the same result validation protocol with random allocation of the sample in training and testing subsets and subsequent cross-over. ANNs resulted to be significantly more accurate than LDA with an overall accuracy rate near to 90%.

Conclusion: Artificial neural networks technology is highly promising in the development of accurate diagnostic tools designed to recognize patients at high risk of death for UGIB.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工神经网络早期预测非静脉曲张性上消化道出血(UGIB)患者死亡率。
背景:非静脉曲张性上消化道出血(UGIB)的死亡率在出血发生后的最初12-24小时具有临床相关性,因此在内镜检查前确定预测死亡风险的临床因素可能有助于早期纠正性治疗干预。目的:1)识别可预测非静脉曲张性UGIB患者死亡风险的简单早期临床变量;2)评估使用传统统计开发的预测模型与使用人工神经网络(ANNs)开发的预测模型的预估增益。方法和结果:作为意大利一项多中心研究的一部分,对807例非曲张性UGIB患者(527例男性,280例女性)进行了分析。如果死亡发生在出血后30天内,则认为死亡与出血有关。共分析了50个自变量,其中49个为临床记忆变量,均在内镜检查前收集,并在急诊室入院时测量血红蛋白值。死亡42例(5.2%)。将传统统计技术(线性判别分析)与采用相同结果验证方案的人工神经网络(Twist®系统- semeion)进行比较,在训练和测试子集中随机分配样本并随后交叉。人工神经网络的准确率明显高于LDA,总体准确率接近90%。结论:人工神经网络技术在开发准确的诊断工具以识别UGIB的高死亡风险患者方面具有很大的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Data-Driven Approach to Predicting Septic Shock in the Intensive Care Unit A Genome Model to Explain Major Features of Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Newborns. Mathematical Model for Computer-Assisted Modification of Medication Dosing Rules. Applying Supervised Machine Learning to Identify Which Patient Characteristics Identify the Highest Rates of Mortality Post-Interhospital Transfer. Coalitional Game Theory Facilitates Identification of Non-Coding Variants Associated With Autism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1