Value of p16(INK4a) and Ki-67 Immunohistochemical Staining in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 Biopsies as Biomarkers for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3 in Cone Results.

IF 0.1 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology Pub Date : 2016-02-01
Ester Miralpeix, Josep M Solé-Sedeño, Gemma Mancebo, Belen Lloveras, Beatriz Bellosillo, Ramon Carreras, Francesc Alameda
{"title":"Value of p16(INK4a) and Ki-67 Immunohistochemical Staining in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 Biopsies as Biomarkers for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3 in Cone Results.","authors":"Ester Miralpeix,&nbsp;Josep M Solé-Sedeño,&nbsp;Gemma Mancebo,&nbsp;Belen Lloveras,&nbsp;Beatriz Bellosillo,&nbsp;Ramon Carreras,&nbsp;Francesc Alameda","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the usefulness of p16(INK4a) (p16) and Ki-67 staining in high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2) biopsies in order to predict CIN3 results in cone specimens, thereby sparing those not likely at risk for CIN3 from unnecessary cone excision.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We retrospectively recruited patients with CIN2 colposcopy-directed biopsy treated by loop electrosurgical excision procedure. The expression of p16 and Ki-67 was qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed in all biopsies and cone specimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 patients from January 2009 to December 2010 were included in the study. CIN3 in cone specimens was observed in 35 patients (28.5%). Ki-67 positive immunostaining in > 50% of epithelial cells was related to CIN3 diagnoses in cone specimens (p = 0.043). However, p16+ and Ki-67+ evaluated by thirds of the epithelial thickness in CIN2 biopsies did not show a significant correlation with the cone results. In multivariate analysis, Ki-67 cell expression over 50% in CIN2 biopsies and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) in the previous cytology were statistically associated with CIN3 results in the cone (odds ratio [OR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-6.29; OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.07-6.72, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with HSIL in the previous cytology and Ki-67 cell expression over 50% in their CIN2 biopsies could be considered in need of treatment by cone for their higher risk of underlying CIN3 lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55517,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology","volume":"38 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of p16(INK4a) (p16) and Ki-67 staining in high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2) biopsies in order to predict CIN3 results in cone specimens, thereby sparing those not likely at risk for CIN3 from unnecessary cone excision.

Study design: We retrospectively recruited patients with CIN2 colposcopy-directed biopsy treated by loop electrosurgical excision procedure. The expression of p16 and Ki-67 was qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed in all biopsies and cone specimens.

Results: A total of 123 patients from January 2009 to December 2010 were included in the study. CIN3 in cone specimens was observed in 35 patients (28.5%). Ki-67 positive immunostaining in > 50% of epithelial cells was related to CIN3 diagnoses in cone specimens (p = 0.043). However, p16+ and Ki-67+ evaluated by thirds of the epithelial thickness in CIN2 biopsies did not show a significant correlation with the cone results. In multivariate analysis, Ki-67 cell expression over 50% in CIN2 biopsies and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) in the previous cytology were statistically associated with CIN3 results in the cone (odds ratio [OR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-6.29; OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.07-6.72, respectively).

Conclusion: Patients with HSIL in the previous cytology and Ki-67 cell expression over 50% in their CIN2 biopsies could be considered in need of treatment by cone for their higher risk of underlying CIN3 lesions.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
p16(INK4a)和Ki-67免疫组化染色在宫颈上皮内瘤变2级活检中作为宫颈上皮内瘤变3级生物标志物的价值
目的:评估p16(INK4a) (p16)和Ki-67染色在高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN2)活检中的作用,以预测锥体标本的CIN3结果,从而使那些不可能有CIN3风险的患者免于不必要的锥体切除。研究设计:我们回顾性地招募了CIN2阴道镜指导活检的患者,并采用环电切手术治疗。对p16和Ki-67在所有活检和锥体标本中的表达进行定性和定量分析。结果:2009年1月至2010年12月共纳入123例患者。35例(28.5%)患者锥体标本中有CIN3。≥50%的上皮细胞Ki-67免疫染色阳性与锥体标本CIN3诊断相关(p = 0.043)。然而,在CIN2活检中,p16+和Ki-67+以三分之一的上皮厚度评估,与锥结果没有显着相关性。在多因素分析中,在CIN2活检中Ki-67细胞的表达超过50%,以及之前细胞学检查中发现的高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)与锥部的CIN3结果具有统计学相关性(优势比[OR] 2.55, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.04-6.29;OR 2.68, 95% CI分别为1.07-6.72)。结论:既往细胞学检查为HSIL的患者,其CIN2活检中Ki-67细胞表达超过50%,因其潜在CIN3病变的风险较高,可考虑采用cone治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: AQCH is an Official Periodical of The International Academy of Cytology and the Italian Society of Urologic Pathology.
期刊最新文献
Automated Region-based Prostate Cancer Cell Nuclei Localization. Part of a Prognostic Modality Tool for Prostate Cancer Patients. Distribution and Developmental Changes of Neuropeptide Y and Its Y1 Receptor-like Immunoreactive Cells in the Duck Thymus. Immunohistochemical Expression and Clinical Significance of Wnt11 and BCL2A1 in Complete Moles. Malignant Bilateral Basifrontal Solitary Fibrous Tumor. A Case Report. Gentian Violet Used as an Epithelial Cell Monolayer Stain in the Scratch Wound Healing Assay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1