Dans quelle position les femmes accouchent-elles en 2015 ? Résultats d’une étude prospective régionale multicentrique

D. Desseauve , B. Gachon , P. Bertherat , L. Fradet , P. Lacouture , F. Pierre
{"title":"Dans quelle position les femmes accouchent-elles en 2015 ? Résultats d’une étude prospective régionale multicentrique","authors":"D. Desseauve ,&nbsp;B. Gachon ,&nbsp;P. Bertherat ,&nbsp;L. Fradet ,&nbsp;P. Lacouture ,&nbsp;F. Pierre","doi":"10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the frequency of labor and birth positions in 2015, and identify factors associated with choosing and changing position during labor.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Multicenter prospective study during five weeks in 2015. We collected the distribution of the observed positions during the first and second stage of labor. Then we considered the main birth position as the one used for the longest duration. Factors associated to the main birth position as well as to the changes of position during labor were studied using univariate analysis and the role of each factor was analyzed using multilevel logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among women who delivered, 86.1% did so in gynecological position. There was a center effect for the position during the expulsive phase, which was not related to legal status or level of perinatal care. After adjustment, a labor duration shorter than 2<!--> <!-->hours was associated to dorsal decubitus during labor (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.1 95%CI [1.01–4.3]). Prematurity and labor duration less than 2<!--> <!-->hours decreased the occurrence of changes in position during labor: OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.05 95%CI [0.01–0.2] and OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.2 95%CI [0.1–0.3]. Epidural analgesia was associated to change in birth position during labor: (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.1 95%CI [1.2–3.8]). During the expulsive phase, primiparity and labor duration less than 2<!--> <!-->hours were associated to dorsal decubitus position (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3.6 95%CI [1.2–10.8]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Women still mostly deliver in gynecological position in 2015. A systematic collection of birth positions on the partograph, with an acute definition of these positions, could allow an evaluation of the benefits/disadvantages of the different positions currently available.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55077,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.06.010","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297958916301722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective

To assess the frequency of labor and birth positions in 2015, and identify factors associated with choosing and changing position during labor.

Methods

Multicenter prospective study during five weeks in 2015. We collected the distribution of the observed positions during the first and second stage of labor. Then we considered the main birth position as the one used for the longest duration. Factors associated to the main birth position as well as to the changes of position during labor were studied using univariate analysis and the role of each factor was analyzed using multilevel logistic regression.

Results

Among women who delivered, 86.1% did so in gynecological position. There was a center effect for the position during the expulsive phase, which was not related to legal status or level of perinatal care. After adjustment, a labor duration shorter than 2 hours was associated to dorsal decubitus during labor (OR = 2.1 95%CI [1.01–4.3]). Prematurity and labor duration less than 2 hours decreased the occurrence of changes in position during labor: OR = 0.05 95%CI [0.01–0.2] and OR = 0.2 95%CI [0.1–0.3]. Epidural analgesia was associated to change in birth position during labor: (OR = 2.1 95%CI [1.2–3.8]). During the expulsive phase, primiparity and labor duration less than 2 hours were associated to dorsal decubitus position (OR = 3.6 95%CI [1.2–10.8]).

Conclusion

Women still mostly deliver in gynecological position in 2015. A systematic collection of birth positions on the partograph, with an acute definition of these positions, could allow an evaluation of the benefits/disadvantages of the different positions currently available.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2015年女性分娩的位置是什么?多中心区域前瞻性研究的结果
目的了解2015年产妇产程及分娩体位的发生频率,探讨产程中体位选择及变化的相关因素。方法2015年进行为期5周的多中心前瞻性研究。我们收集了第一和第二产程观察到的体位分布。然后我们将主要出生体位视为持续时间最长的体位。采用单因素分析研究分娩体位与分娩体位变化的相关因素,采用多水平logistic回归分析各因素的作用。结果86.1%的产妇在妇科体位分娩。排娩期体位存在中心效应,与法律地位和围产期护理水平无关。调整后,分娩时间短于2小时与分娩时背卧有关(OR = 2.1 95%CI[1.01-4.3])。早产和产程小于2小时降低产程体位变化的发生:OR = 0.05 95%CI[0.01-0.2]和OR = 0.2 95%CI[0.1-0.3]。分娩时硬膜外镇痛与分娩体位改变相关:(OR = 2.1 95%CI[1.2-3.8])。在排出期,初产和产程小于2小时与仰卧位有关(OR = 3.6 95%CI[1.2-10.8])。结论2015年产妇仍以妇科体位分娩为主。在产程上系统地收集出生体位,并对这些体位进行精确的定义,可以对目前可用的不同体位的利弊进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Hysterosonography]. Editorial Board Cancer du sein et diabète de type 2 : des interactions complexes [Does the use of deodorant cause breast cancer? It remains to be proved]. Tumors in recent Prehistory. Contributions from Cova des Pas (Menorca Island).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1