Neural correlates of older adults' self-overestimation of stepping-over ability.

AGE Pub Date : 2016-08-01 Epub Date: 2016-07-23 DOI:10.1007/s11357-016-9932-z
Ryota Sakurai, Yoshinori Fujiwara, Masashi Yasunaga, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Yoh Murayama, Kuniyasu Imanaka, Kazuyuki Kanosue, Kenji Ishii
{"title":"Neural correlates of older adults' self-overestimation of stepping-over ability.","authors":"Ryota Sakurai,&nbsp;Yoshinori Fujiwara,&nbsp;Masashi Yasunaga,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Suzuki,&nbsp;Yoh Murayama,&nbsp;Kuniyasu Imanaka,&nbsp;Kazuyuki Kanosue,&nbsp;Kenji Ishii","doi":"10.1007/s11357-016-9932-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A growing body of literature indicates that cognitively intact older adults tend to overestimate their physical functioning (e.g., step-over ability), which may lead to fall risk. However, the neural correlates underlying this phenomenon are still unclear. We therefore investigated the neural basis of older adults' self-overestimation of stepping-over ability. A total of 108 well-functioning community dwelling older adults (mean age = 73.9 years) performed step-over tests (SOT) in two ways: self-estimation of step-over ability and an actual step-over task. During the self-estimation task, participants observed a horizontal bar at a distance of 7 m and estimated the maximum height (EH) of successful SOT trials. The actual SOT was then performed to determine the actual maximum height (AH) of successful trials. Participants also underwent positron emission tomography with <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose at rest to assess cerebral neural activity. The SOT showed that 22.2 % of participants overestimated their step-over ability. A regression analysis adjusted for potential covariates showed that increased self-estimation error (difference between EH and AH) was correlated with lower glucose metabolism in the bilateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and left frontal pole. Only the significant correlation between self-estimation error and OFC activity persisted after correcting for multiple comparisons. For well-functioning healthy older adults, overlooking one's own functional decline may be influenced by reduced metabolic activity in the anterior prefrontal cortex, particularly in the OFC. Our findings also suggest that functional decline in the OFC prevents older adults from updating the qualitative/quantitative values of their impaired physical abilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":7632,"journal":{"name":"AGE","volume":" ","pages":"351-361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11357-016-9932-z","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AGE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-016-9932-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

A growing body of literature indicates that cognitively intact older adults tend to overestimate their physical functioning (e.g., step-over ability), which may lead to fall risk. However, the neural correlates underlying this phenomenon are still unclear. We therefore investigated the neural basis of older adults' self-overestimation of stepping-over ability. A total of 108 well-functioning community dwelling older adults (mean age = 73.9 years) performed step-over tests (SOT) in two ways: self-estimation of step-over ability and an actual step-over task. During the self-estimation task, participants observed a horizontal bar at a distance of 7 m and estimated the maximum height (EH) of successful SOT trials. The actual SOT was then performed to determine the actual maximum height (AH) of successful trials. Participants also underwent positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose at rest to assess cerebral neural activity. The SOT showed that 22.2 % of participants overestimated their step-over ability. A regression analysis adjusted for potential covariates showed that increased self-estimation error (difference between EH and AH) was correlated with lower glucose metabolism in the bilateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and left frontal pole. Only the significant correlation between self-estimation error and OFC activity persisted after correcting for multiple comparisons. For well-functioning healthy older adults, overlooking one's own functional decline may be influenced by reduced metabolic activity in the anterior prefrontal cortex, particularly in the OFC. Our findings also suggest that functional decline in the OFC prevents older adults from updating the qualitative/quantitative values of their impaired physical abilities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人跨步能力自我高估的神经机制研究。
越来越多的文献表明,认知完整的老年人倾向于高估他们的身体功能(例如,跨步能力),这可能导致跌倒的风险。然而,这种现象背后的神经关联尚不清楚。因此,我们研究了老年人跨步能力自我高估的神经基础。共有108名功能良好的社区居住老年人(平均年龄= 73.9岁)通过两种方式进行了跨越测试(SOT):自我评估跨越能力和实际跨越任务。在自我估计任务中,被试观察距离为7 m的单杠,并估计成功的SOT试验的最大高度(EH)。然后进行实际SOT以确定成功试验的实际最大高度(AH)。参与者还在休息时使用18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖进行正电子发射断层扫描,以评估大脑神经活动。SOT结果显示,22.2%的参与者高估了自己的跨步能力。校正潜在协变量的回归分析显示,自我估计误差(EH和AH之间的差异)的增加与双侧眶额皮质(OFC)和左额极的糖代谢降低相关。经过多次比较校正后,只有自我估计误差与OFC活动之间存在显著相关性。对于功能良好的健康老年人,忽视自身功能衰退可能受到前额叶前部皮质(尤其是OFC)代谢活动减少的影响。我们的研究结果还表明,OFC的功能下降阻碍了老年人更新其受损身体能力的定性/定量值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AGE
AGE 医学-老年医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
News & Views Aging in America Tinetti mobility test is related to muscle mass and strength in non-institutionalized elderly people. Age-associated vulval integrity is an important marker of nematode healthspan. Interspecific correlation between red blood cell mitochondrial ROS production, cardiolipin content and longevity in birds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1