{"title":"Intellectual Disabilities and Decision Making at End of Life: A Literature Review.","authors":"Abbie Kirkendall, Kristen Linton, Saritha Farris","doi":"10.1111/jar.12270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with an intellectual disability are vulnerable to having end-of-life decisions made for them merely due to the presence of a disability. As a result, decisions made by others may not reflect the exact wishes of the individual.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review examines literature on individuals with an intellectual disability in making end-of-life decisions from the years 2000 to 2014. A total of 38 articles were found with 12 articles having a direct focus on end-of-life decision making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The emerging themes include the following: (i) assumption of lack of capacity, (ii) inconsistency in evaluating capacity and communication challenges and (iii) third party decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Earlier discussions about end-of-life planning before the diagnosis of a life-limiting illness would be beneficial. Lacking is a consistent approach to determining capacity for individuals with an intellectual disability. The findings from this review provide a foundation for a decision tree in end-of-life decision making for individuals with an intellectual disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":73610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","volume":"30 6","pages":"982-994"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jar.12270","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41
Abstract
Background: Individuals with an intellectual disability are vulnerable to having end-of-life decisions made for them merely due to the presence of a disability. As a result, decisions made by others may not reflect the exact wishes of the individual.
Methods: This review examines literature on individuals with an intellectual disability in making end-of-life decisions from the years 2000 to 2014. A total of 38 articles were found with 12 articles having a direct focus on end-of-life decision making.
Results: The emerging themes include the following: (i) assumption of lack of capacity, (ii) inconsistency in evaluating capacity and communication challenges and (iii) third party decisions.
Conclusions: Earlier discussions about end-of-life planning before the diagnosis of a life-limiting illness would be beneficial. Lacking is a consistent approach to determining capacity for individuals with an intellectual disability. The findings from this review provide a foundation for a decision tree in end-of-life decision making for individuals with an intellectual disability.