Patient-reported outcomes of caries prophylaxis among Swedish caries active adults in a long-term perspective.

Q Dentistry Swedish dental journal Pub Date : 2016-01-01
Håkan Flink, Åke Tegelberg, Judy Arnetz, Dowen Birkhed
{"title":"Patient-reported outcomes of caries prophylaxis among Swedish caries active adults in a long-term perspective.","authors":"Håkan Flink,&nbsp;Åke Tegelberg,&nbsp;Judy Arnetz,&nbsp;Dowen Birkhed","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to measure patient-reported outcomes of caries prophylaxis and to compare them with previously documented efforts in dental offices. A questionnaire was mailed to 134 caries active (CA) and 40 caries inactive (CI) adult patients treated at a Swedish public dental service clinic. The overall response rate was 69%. The questionnaire included items regarding patient perceived caries prophylaxis in relation to: 1) treatment and recommendations given by the dental personnel, 2) performed self-care and 3) perceived and expected effects.The responses were studied for their association to clinical data, extracted retrospectively from the patients' dental records.The mean follow up time was > 16 years. Information about caries prophylaxis (p = 0.01) and recommendations for self-care (p = 0.04) were given more often to the CA group than to the CI group. Supplementary examinations and recommendations of self-care risk treatments were more frequent in the CA group (p < 0.001). CA patients also made more frequent extra efforts at home to avoid caries by changing their eating habits (p < 0.001), improving their oral hygiene (p = 0.04) and using extra fluoride (p = 0.001). In the CA group, 60% did not considerthat the extra prophylaxis efforts had made them caries inactive, and 40% were not satisfied with the outcome. Most patients (> 90%) hoped that the outcome of caries prophylactics would be a reduced number of cavities.The patient-perceived experiences of caries prophylaxis-were in concordance with dental records. Both the dentists and the caries active middle-aged Swedish adults were aware of the need for extra prophylaxis.The caries active patients perceived having made extra home care efforts, but had not experienced that they had become free from caries.</p>","PeriodicalId":22114,"journal":{"name":"Swedish dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swedish dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to measure patient-reported outcomes of caries prophylaxis and to compare them with previously documented efforts in dental offices. A questionnaire was mailed to 134 caries active (CA) and 40 caries inactive (CI) adult patients treated at a Swedish public dental service clinic. The overall response rate was 69%. The questionnaire included items regarding patient perceived caries prophylaxis in relation to: 1) treatment and recommendations given by the dental personnel, 2) performed self-care and 3) perceived and expected effects.The responses were studied for their association to clinical data, extracted retrospectively from the patients' dental records.The mean follow up time was > 16 years. Information about caries prophylaxis (p = 0.01) and recommendations for self-care (p = 0.04) were given more often to the CA group than to the CI group. Supplementary examinations and recommendations of self-care risk treatments were more frequent in the CA group (p < 0.001). CA patients also made more frequent extra efforts at home to avoid caries by changing their eating habits (p < 0.001), improving their oral hygiene (p = 0.04) and using extra fluoride (p = 0.001). In the CA group, 60% did not considerthat the extra prophylaxis efforts had made them caries inactive, and 40% were not satisfied with the outcome. Most patients (> 90%) hoped that the outcome of caries prophylactics would be a reduced number of cavities.The patient-perceived experiences of caries prophylaxis-were in concordance with dental records. Both the dentists and the caries active middle-aged Swedish adults were aware of the need for extra prophylaxis.The caries active patients perceived having made extra home care efforts, but had not experienced that they had become free from caries.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期来看,瑞典龋齿活跃的成年人中患者报告的龋齿预防结果。
本研究的目的是测量患者报告的预防龋齿的结果,并将其与以前在牙科诊所记录的努力进行比较。向瑞典一家公共牙科诊所接受治疗的134名活动性龋齿(CA)和40名非活动性龋齿(CI)成年患者邮寄了一份调查问卷。总有效率为69%。问卷内容包括:1)牙科人员的治疗和建议;2)自我护理;3)感知和预期效果。研究了这些反应与临床数据的关联,这些临床数据是从患者的牙科记录中回顾性提取的。平均随访时间> 16年。CA组比CI组更经常提供龋齿预防信息(p = 0.01)和自我保健建议(p = 0.04)。CA组的补充检查和自我护理风险治疗建议更频繁(p < 0.001)。CA患者在家中通过改变饮食习惯(p < 0.001)、改善口腔卫生(p = 0.04)和使用额外的氟化物(p = 0.001)来避免龋齿的额外努力也更频繁。在CA组中,60%的人不认为额外的预防措施使他们的龋齿不活跃,40%的人对结果不满意。大多数患者(> 90%)希望预防蛀牙的结果是减少蛀牙的数量。患者对预防龋齿的感知经验与牙科记录一致。牙医和龋齿活跃的瑞典中年成年人都意识到需要额外的预防措施。龋齿活跃的患者认为做了额外的家庭护理努力,但没有体验到他们已经摆脱了龋齿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Swedish dental journal
Swedish dental journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
0.85
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Swedish Dental Journal is the scientific journal of the Swedish Dental Association and the Swedish Dental Society. It is published 4 times a year to promote practice, education and research within odontology. Manuscripts containing original research are accepted for consideraion if neither the article nor any part of its essential substance has been or will be published elsewhere. Reviews, Case Reports and Short Communications will also be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Adverbs Verbs Punctuation Conjunctions Prepositions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1