Going GLP: Conducting Toxicology Studies in Compliance with Good Laboratory Practices.

U.S. Army Medical Department journal Pub Date : 2016-10-01
Erica Eggers Carroll
{"title":"Going GLP: Conducting Toxicology Studies in Compliance with Good Laboratory Practices.","authors":"Erica Eggers Carroll","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Good laboratory practice standards are US federal regulations enacted as part of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (40 CFR Part 160), the Toxic Substance Control Act (40 CFR Part 792), and the Good Laboratory Practice for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies (21 CFR Part 58) to support protection of public health in the areas of pesticides, chemicals, and drug investigations in response to allegations of inaccurate data acquisition. Essentially, good laboratory practices (GLPs) are a system of management controls for nonclinical research studies involving animals to ensure the uniformity, consistency, reliability, reproducibility, quality, and integrity of data collected as part of chemical (including pharmaceuticals) tests, from in vitro through acute to chronic toxicity tests. The GLPs were established in the United States in 1978 as a result of the Industrial Bio-Test Laboratory scandal which led to congressional hearings and actions to prevent fraudulent data reporting and collection. Although the establishment of infrastructure for GLPs compliance is labor-intensive and time-consuming, achievement and maintenance of GLP compliance ensures the accuracy of the data collected from each study, which is critical for defending results, advancing science, and protecting human and animal health. This article describes how and why those in the US Army Medical Department responsible for protecting the public health of US Army and other military personnel made the policy decision to have its toxicology laboratory achieve complete compliance with GLP standards, the first such among US Army laboratories. The challenges faced and how they were overcome are detailed. </p>","PeriodicalId":88789,"journal":{"name":"U.S. Army Medical Department journal","volume":" 3-16","pages":"64-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U.S. Army Medical Department journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Good laboratory practice standards are US federal regulations enacted as part of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (40 CFR Part 160), the Toxic Substance Control Act (40 CFR Part 792), and the Good Laboratory Practice for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies (21 CFR Part 58) to support protection of public health in the areas of pesticides, chemicals, and drug investigations in response to allegations of inaccurate data acquisition. Essentially, good laboratory practices (GLPs) are a system of management controls for nonclinical research studies involving animals to ensure the uniformity, consistency, reliability, reproducibility, quality, and integrity of data collected as part of chemical (including pharmaceuticals) tests, from in vitro through acute to chronic toxicity tests. The GLPs were established in the United States in 1978 as a result of the Industrial Bio-Test Laboratory scandal which led to congressional hearings and actions to prevent fraudulent data reporting and collection. Although the establishment of infrastructure for GLPs compliance is labor-intensive and time-consuming, achievement and maintenance of GLP compliance ensures the accuracy of the data collected from each study, which is critical for defending results, advancing science, and protecting human and animal health. This article describes how and why those in the US Army Medical Department responsible for protecting the public health of US Army and other military personnel made the policy decision to have its toxicology laboratory achieve complete compliance with GLP standards, the first such among US Army laboratories. The challenges faced and how they were overcome are detailed.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GLP:按照良好实验室规范进行毒理学研究。
良好实验室规范标准是美国联邦法规,作为联邦杀虫剂、杀菌剂和灭鼠剂法案(40 CFR第160部分)、有毒物质控制法(40 CFR第792部分)和非临床实验室研究良好实验室规范(21 CFR第58部分)的一部分颁布,以支持在农药、化学品和药物调查领域保护公众健康,以应对数据采集不准确的指控。从本质上讲,良好实验室规范(glp)是一个管理控制系统,用于涉及动物的非临床研究,以确保作为化学(包括药物)测试的一部分收集的数据的统一性、一致性、可靠性、可重复性、质量和完整性,从体外到急性到慢性毒性测试。glp于1978年在美国成立,原因是工业生物测试实验室丑闻导致国会举行听证会,并采取行动防止欺诈性数据报告和收集。尽管建立符合GLP的基础设施是一项劳动密集型和耗时的工作,但实现和维护GLP合规可以确保从每项研究中收集的数据的准确性,这对于捍卫结果、推进科学以及保护人类和动物健康至关重要。本文描述了负责保护美国陆军和其他军事人员公众健康的美国陆军医疗部门如何以及为什么做出政策决定,使其毒理学实验室完全符合GLP标准,这是美国陆军实验室中第一个这样的实验室。书中详细描述了所面临的挑战以及如何克服这些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COMMANDER’S INTRODUCTION Fresh Frozen Plasma Animal Derived Thiol Induced Work Exacerbated Asthma: A Brief Case Report of a Unique Workplace Hazard. Motivational Guest Speaker Presentation as an Anti-Stigma Intervention for US Army Soldiers. Lessons Learned: Military Screening for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1