Use of Intra-aortic- Balloon Pump Counterpulsation in Patients with Symptomatic Vasospasm Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Neurogenic Stress Cardiomyopathy.

Fawaz Al-Mufti, Nicholas Morris, Shouri Lahiri, William Roth, Jens Witsch, Iona Machado, Sachin Agarwal, Soojin Park, Philip M Meyers, E Sander Connolly, Jan Claassen
{"title":"Use of Intra-aortic- Balloon Pump Counterpulsation in Patients with Symptomatic Vasospasm Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Neurogenic Stress Cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Fawaz Al-Mufti,&nbsp;Nicholas Morris,&nbsp;Shouri Lahiri,&nbsp;William Roth,&nbsp;Jens Witsch,&nbsp;Iona Machado,&nbsp;Sachin Agarwal,&nbsp;Soojin Park,&nbsp;Philip M Meyers,&nbsp;E Sander Connolly,&nbsp;Jan Claassen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intra-aortic counterpulsation balloon pumps (IABPs) have been widely used to augment hemodynamics in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock and have recently been proposed as a management strategy for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients with neurogenic stress cardiomyopathy (NSC). Prior case series have described the use of IABP as a means to manage cardiogenic shock in this patient population; however, we sought to describe our experience with IABP as a means to wean vasopressor requirement while augmenting hemodynamics and maintaining pressures at goal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five patients were identified from a single center, prospective, observational cohort study that received an IABP for the management of ischemia related to cerebral vasospasm in the setting of NSC. We evaluated all cases for efficacy of IABP in reducing vasopressor requirement, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vasopressor requirements were reduced by a mean of 50% (range 25-65%) following IABPs placement within 24-48 h. There were no significant complications from IABPs. Out of the five patients, the outcome in three cases was favorable (mRS≤1). Two patients suffered delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), one patient passed away due to severe sepsis, and one patient was left with severe disability. Only one patient required anticoagulation and that was for a preexisting deep venous thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of IABPs may be beneficial as an adjunctive therapy in SAH patients with concomitant symptomatic vasospasm and NSC.</p>","PeriodicalId":88555,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology","volume":"9 1","pages":"28-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4925763/pdf/jvin-9-1-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intra-aortic counterpulsation balloon pumps (IABPs) have been widely used to augment hemodynamics in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock and have recently been proposed as a management strategy for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients with neurogenic stress cardiomyopathy (NSC). Prior case series have described the use of IABP as a means to manage cardiogenic shock in this patient population; however, we sought to describe our experience with IABP as a means to wean vasopressor requirement while augmenting hemodynamics and maintaining pressures at goal.

Methods: Five patients were identified from a single center, prospective, observational cohort study that received an IABP for the management of ischemia related to cerebral vasospasm in the setting of NSC. We evaluated all cases for efficacy of IABP in reducing vasopressor requirement, and complications.

Results: Vasopressor requirements were reduced by a mean of 50% (range 25-65%) following IABPs placement within 24-48 h. There were no significant complications from IABPs. Out of the five patients, the outcome in three cases was favorable (mRS≤1). Two patients suffered delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), one patient passed away due to severe sepsis, and one patient was left with severe disability. Only one patient required anticoagulation and that was for a preexisting deep venous thrombosis.

Conclusion: The use of IABPs may be beneficial as an adjunctive therapy in SAH patients with concomitant symptomatic vasospasm and NSC.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用主动脉内球囊泵反搏治疗蛛网膜下腔出血和神经源性应激性心肌病后症状性血管痉挛。
主动脉内反搏球囊泵(IABPs)已被广泛用于心源性休克危重患者的血液动力学增强,最近被提出作为蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)合并神经源性应激性心肌病(NSC)患者的一种治疗策略。先前的病例系列描述了使用IABP作为一种手段来管理心源性休克的患者群体;然而,我们试图描述我们使用IABP的经验,作为在增加血流动力学和维持目标压力的同时减少血管加压剂需求的一种手段。方法:从一项单中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究中确定5例接受IABP治疗NSC背景下脑血管痉挛相关缺血的患者。我们评估了所有病例IABP在降低血管加压素需求和并发症方面的疗效。结果:在放置IABPs后的24-48小时内,血管加压素的需要量平均降低了50%(范围25-65%)。IABPs没有明显的并发症。5例患者中,3例预后良好(mRS≤1)。2例患者出现迟发性脑缺血(DCI), 1例患者因严重败血症死亡,1例患者严重残疾。只有一名患者需要抗凝治疗,而且是为了治疗先前存在的深静脉血栓。结论:对于伴有症状性血管痉挛和NSC的SAH患者,使用IABPs作为辅助治疗可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Superior cervical ganglion stimulation results in potent cerebral vasoconstriction in swine. Institution of Code Neurointervention and Its Impact on Reaction and Treatment Times. Safety and Clinical Outcomes after Transverse Venous Sinus Stenting for Treatment of Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Single Center Experience. Comparative Analysis of Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Treatment Outcomes and Complications with the Classic versus Flex Pipeline Embolization Devices and Phenom versus Marksman Microcatheter Delivery System: The Role of Microcatheter Choice on Complication Rate. Prediction of Symptomatic Vasospasm in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Using Early Transcranial Doppler.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1