Small Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Using Target (®) Ultrasoft (™) Coils.

Gaurav Jindal, Timothy Miller, Moronke Iyohe, Ravi Shivashankar, Vikram Prasad, Dheeraj Gandhi
{"title":"Small Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Using Target (®) Ultrasoft (™) Coils.","authors":"Gaurav Jindal,&nbsp;Timothy Miller,&nbsp;Moronke Iyohe,&nbsp;Ravi Shivashankar,&nbsp;Vikram Prasad,&nbsp;Dheeraj Gandhi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The introduction of small, soft, complex-shaped microcoils has helped facilitate the endovascular treatment of small intracranial aneurysms (IAs) over the last several years. Here, we evaluate the initial safety and efficacy of treating small IAs using only Target(®) Ultrasoft(™) coils.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained clinical database at a single, high volume, teaching hospital was performed from September 2011 to May 2015. IAs smaller than or equal to 5.0 mm in maximal dimension treated with only Target(®) Ultrasoft(™) coils were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 patients with 50 intracranial aneurysms were included. Subarachnoid hemorrhage from index aneurysm rupture was the indication for treatment in 23 of 50 (46%) cases, and prior subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) from another aneurysm was the indication for treatment in eight of 50 (16%) cases. The complete aneurysm occlusion rate was 70% (35/50), the minimal residual aneurysm rate was 14% (7/50), and residual aneurysm rate was 16% (8/50). One intraoperative aneurysm rupture occurred. Three patients died during hospitalization from clinical sequelae of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Follow-up at a mean of 13.6 months demonstrated complete aneurysm occlusion in 75% (30/40) of cases, near complete occlusion in 15% (6/40) of cases, and residual aneurysm in 10% (4/40) of cases, all four of which were retreated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our initial results using only Target(®) Ultrasoft(™) coils for the endovascular treatment of small intracranial aneurysms demonstrate initial excellent safety and efficacy profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":88555,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology","volume":"9 1","pages":"46-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4925766/pdf/jvin-9-1-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The introduction of small, soft, complex-shaped microcoils has helped facilitate the endovascular treatment of small intracranial aneurysms (IAs) over the last several years. Here, we evaluate the initial safety and efficacy of treating small IAs using only Target(®) Ultrasoft(™) coils.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained clinical database at a single, high volume, teaching hospital was performed from September 2011 to May 2015. IAs smaller than or equal to 5.0 mm in maximal dimension treated with only Target(®) Ultrasoft(™) coils were included.

Results: A total of 50 patients with 50 intracranial aneurysms were included. Subarachnoid hemorrhage from index aneurysm rupture was the indication for treatment in 23 of 50 (46%) cases, and prior subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) from another aneurysm was the indication for treatment in eight of 50 (16%) cases. The complete aneurysm occlusion rate was 70% (35/50), the minimal residual aneurysm rate was 14% (7/50), and residual aneurysm rate was 16% (8/50). One intraoperative aneurysm rupture occurred. Three patients died during hospitalization from clinical sequelae of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Follow-up at a mean of 13.6 months demonstrated complete aneurysm occlusion in 75% (30/40) of cases, near complete occlusion in 15% (6/40) of cases, and residual aneurysm in 10% (4/40) of cases, all four of which were retreated.

Conclusion: Our initial results using only Target(®) Ultrasoft(™) coils for the endovascular treatment of small intracranial aneurysms demonstrate initial excellent safety and efficacy profiles.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用Target(®)Ultrasoft(™)线圈治疗颅内小动脉瘤。
目的:在过去的几年里,小、软、复杂形状的微线圈的引入有助于促进小颅内动脉瘤(IAs)的血管内治疗。在这里,我们评估了仅使用Target(®)Ultrasoft(™)线圈治疗小IAs的初步安全性和有效性。材料和方法:对2011年9月至2015年5月期间在一家单一的大容量教学医院前瞻性维护的临床数据库进行回顾性分析。仅用Target(®)Ultrasoft(™)线圈处理的最大尺寸小于或等于5.0 mm的IAs包括在内。结果:共纳入50例颅内动脉瘤。50例(46%)病例中有23例(46%)以动脉瘤破裂所致的蛛网膜下腔出血为治疗指征,50例(16%)中有8例(16%)以其他动脉瘤所致的蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)为治疗指征。动脉瘤完全闭塞率为70%(35/50),极小残留率为14%(7/50),残留率为16%(8/50)。术中动脉瘤破裂1例。3例患者在住院期间死于蛛网膜下腔出血的临床后遗症。平均随访13.6个月,75%(30/40)的病例动脉瘤完全闭塞,15%(6/40)的病例动脉瘤接近完全闭塞,10%(4/40)的病例动脉瘤残留,4例均得到治疗。结论:我们的初步结果显示,仅使用Target(®)Ultrasoft(™)线圈进行血管内治疗颅内小动脉瘤初步显示出良好的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Superior cervical ganglion stimulation results in potent cerebral vasoconstriction in swine. Institution of Code Neurointervention and Its Impact on Reaction and Treatment Times. Safety and Clinical Outcomes after Transverse Venous Sinus Stenting for Treatment of Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Single Center Experience. Comparative Analysis of Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Treatment Outcomes and Complications with the Classic versus Flex Pipeline Embolization Devices and Phenom versus Marksman Microcatheter Delivery System: The Role of Microcatheter Choice on Complication Rate. Prediction of Symptomatic Vasospasm in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Using Early Transcranial Doppler.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1