Skills for Psychological Recovery: Evaluation of a post-disaster mental health training program.

Disaster health Pub Date : 2015-10-09 eCollection Date: 2014-07-01 DOI:10.1080/21665044.2015.1085625
Darryl Wade, David Crompton, Alexandra Howard, Naomi Stevens, Olivia Metcalf, Melissa Brymer, Josef Ruzek, Patricia Watson, Richard Bryant, David Forbes
{"title":"Skills for Psychological Recovery: Evaluation of a post-disaster mental health training program.","authors":"Darryl Wade,&nbsp;David Crompton,&nbsp;Alexandra Howard,&nbsp;Naomi Stevens,&nbsp;Olivia Metcalf,&nbsp;Melissa Brymer,&nbsp;Josef Ruzek,&nbsp;Patricia Watson,&nbsp;Richard Bryant,&nbsp;David Forbes","doi":"10.1080/21665044.2015.1085625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skills for Psychological Recovery (SPR) is a brief skills-based approach to assist community members to better cope after a disaster or other tragedy. This paper reports on an evaluation of a large SPR training and support program following floods and cyclones in Queensland, Australia. The program sought to recruit, train and support competent SPR trainers; provide systematic high-quality training in SPR skills for practitioners; improve the confidence of a large number of practitioners to use SPR; and encourage practitioners' use of SPR with community members. Trainers recruited to the program facilitated 49 training sessions for 788 practitioners across Queensland. Trainers were assessed by practitioners to have high-level competencies to run training sessions. Practitioners reported improved confidence to use each SPR intervention following training and at 6 months post-training. Based on available data, more than 6 out of 10 practitioners used an SPR intervention during the follow up period, with each intervention used by over half of the practitioners at both 3 and 6 months. The most frequently reported barrier to using SPR was not having seen a community member with problems requiring SPR. For trainers, a psychology background and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) orientation were unrelated to their competencies to facilitate practitioner training sessions. For practitioners, a psychology background and to some extent a CBT orientation were related to confidence to use SPR interventions. In summary, this study provides details of an evaluation of a large-scale mental health training and support program to enhance response to meet the mental health needs of those affected by disaster.</p>","PeriodicalId":90817,"journal":{"name":"Disaster health","volume":"2 3-4","pages":"138-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21665044.2015.1085625","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21665044.2015.1085625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Skills for Psychological Recovery (SPR) is a brief skills-based approach to assist community members to better cope after a disaster or other tragedy. This paper reports on an evaluation of a large SPR training and support program following floods and cyclones in Queensland, Australia. The program sought to recruit, train and support competent SPR trainers; provide systematic high-quality training in SPR skills for practitioners; improve the confidence of a large number of practitioners to use SPR; and encourage practitioners' use of SPR with community members. Trainers recruited to the program facilitated 49 training sessions for 788 practitioners across Queensland. Trainers were assessed by practitioners to have high-level competencies to run training sessions. Practitioners reported improved confidence to use each SPR intervention following training and at 6 months post-training. Based on available data, more than 6 out of 10 practitioners used an SPR intervention during the follow up period, with each intervention used by over half of the practitioners at both 3 and 6 months. The most frequently reported barrier to using SPR was not having seen a community member with problems requiring SPR. For trainers, a psychology background and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) orientation were unrelated to their competencies to facilitate practitioner training sessions. For practitioners, a psychology background and to some extent a CBT orientation were related to confidence to use SPR interventions. In summary, this study provides details of an evaluation of a large-scale mental health training and support program to enhance response to meet the mental health needs of those affected by disaster.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理恢复技能:灾后心理健康培训项目评估。
心理恢复技能(SPR)是一种简短的基于技能的方法,帮助社区成员更好地应对灾难或其他悲剧。本文报告了对澳大利亚昆士兰州洪水和气旋后一个大型SPR培训和支持计划的评估。该方案设法征聘、训练和支助有能力的特别方案资源训练员;为从业人员提供系统的、高质量的战略资源技能培训;提高广大从业人员使用SPR的信心;并鼓励从业者与社区成员一起使用特别资源。为该计划招募的培训师为昆士兰州的788名从业人员提供了49次培训。培训师被从业人员评估为具有高水平的能力来运行培训课程。从业人员报告在培训后和培训后6个月使用每次SPR干预措施的信心有所提高。根据现有数据,在随访期间,超过6 / 10的从业者使用了SPR干预措施,在3个月和6个月时,每种干预措施都有超过一半的从业者使用。使用SPR最常见的障碍是没有看到社区成员有需要SPR的问题。对于培训师而言,心理学背景和认知行为疗法(CBT)取向与他们促进从业者培训课程的能力无关。对于从业者来说,心理学背景和某种程度上的CBT取向与使用SPR干预措施的信心有关。总之,本研究提供了一项大规模心理健康培训和支持计划的详细评估,以加强响应,以满足受灾害影响者的心理健康需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A complex social-ecological disaster: Environmentally induced forced migration. The trauma signature of 2016 Hurricane Matthew and the psychosocial impact on Haiti. Toward an integrated understanding of disaster and risk ecology. Fear-related behaviors in situations of mass threat. Socio-demographic patterns of posttraumatic stress disorder in Medellin, Colombia and the context of lifetime trauma exposure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1