Validation of Non-Smoking Status by Spouse Following a Cessation Intervention.

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Smoking Cessation Pub Date : 2017-03-01 Epub Date: 2015-06-15 DOI:10.1017/jsc.2015.11
Raul M Mejia, Sandra Braun, Lorena Peña, Steven E Gregorich, Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
{"title":"Validation of Non-Smoking Status by Spouse Following a Cessation Intervention.","authors":"Raul M Mejia,&nbsp;Sandra Braun,&nbsp;Lorena Peña,&nbsp;Steven E Gregorich,&nbsp;Eliseo J Pérez-Stable","doi":"10.1017/jsc.2015.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following cessation interventions, self-reported smoking abstinence with biochemical verification is the \"gold standard\" for defining outcomes. Because obtaining biochemical verification is challenging in community studies, we compared self-reported cessation among smokers completing treatment to the smoking status reported by each participant's spouse or proxy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were smokers who had reported quitting 12 months after a cessation intervention. Participants had either attended a smoking cessation clinic or they were patients seen by physicians who had recently participated in a cessation-training program. Proxies living with these participants were interviewed by telephone to ask about their partner's smoking status. We compared the participants' responses to those from their spouses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 months, 346 of 1423 baseline smokers had quit; 161/346 reported non-smokers were called and 140 proxies were interviewed. The participants averaged 51 years of age, 69% were women. At baseline, the mean number of cigarettes smoked per day was 20.1 (SD = 9.9) and the average number of quit attempts was 2.4 (SD = 1.2). Cessation methods used were medical advice (21%) and/or pharmacotherapy (79%). Of the 140 spouses interviewed, only 10 (7.1%) reported that their partners were currently smoking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proxy-reported data on smoking status could be used to validate self-report.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"12 1","pages":"38-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/jsc.2015.11","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2015.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Following cessation interventions, self-reported smoking abstinence with biochemical verification is the "gold standard" for defining outcomes. Because obtaining biochemical verification is challenging in community studies, we compared self-reported cessation among smokers completing treatment to the smoking status reported by each participant's spouse or proxy.

Method: Participants were smokers who had reported quitting 12 months after a cessation intervention. Participants had either attended a smoking cessation clinic or they were patients seen by physicians who had recently participated in a cessation-training program. Proxies living with these participants were interviewed by telephone to ask about their partner's smoking status. We compared the participants' responses to those from their spouses.

Results: At 12 months, 346 of 1423 baseline smokers had quit; 161/346 reported non-smokers were called and 140 proxies were interviewed. The participants averaged 51 years of age, 69% were women. At baseline, the mean number of cigarettes smoked per day was 20.1 (SD = 9.9) and the average number of quit attempts was 2.4 (SD = 1.2). Cessation methods used were medical advice (21%) and/or pharmacotherapy (79%). Of the 140 spouses interviewed, only 10 (7.1%) reported that their partners were currently smoking.

Conclusions: Proxy-reported data on smoking status could be used to validate self-report.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
配偶戒烟干预后不吸烟状况的验证。
背景:在戒烟干预之后,经生化验证的自我报告戒烟是确定结果的“金标准”。由于在社区研究中获得生化验证具有挑战性,我们将完成治疗的吸烟者自我报告的戒烟情况与每个参与者的配偶或代理人报告的吸烟状况进行了比较。方法:参与者是在戒烟干预后12个月报告戒烟的吸烟者。参与者要么参加过戒烟诊所,要么是最近参加过戒烟培训项目的医生看过的病人。与这些参与者一起生活的代理人通过电话采访,询问他们伴侣的吸烟状况。我们将参与者的回答与其配偶的回答进行了比较。结果:在12个月时,1423名基线吸烟者中有346人成功戒烟;346名报告的非吸烟者中有161人被传唤,140名代理人被采访。参与者的平均年龄为51岁,其中69%是女性。在基线时,平均每天吸烟20.1支(SD = 9.9),平均戒烟次数为2.4次(SD = 1.2)。使用的戒烟方法是医疗建议(21%)和/或药物治疗(79%)。在接受采访的140名配偶中,只有10人(7.1%)报告他们的伴侣目前吸烟。结论:代理报告的吸烟状况数据可用于验证自我报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
"It Is A Carrot-Stick Model": A Qualitative Study of Rural-Serving Clinician and Rural-Residing Veteran Perceptions of Requirements to Quit Smoking prior to Elective Surgery. Prevalence, Correlates, and Perception of E-cigarettes among Undergraduate Students of Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Evaluation of an Integrated Tobacco Treatment Specialist in Primary Care. The Efficacy of Individualized, Community-Based Physical Activity to Aid Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Effects of Smoking on COVID-19 Management and Mortality: An Umbrella Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1