Aggressive clinical approach to obesity improves metabolic and clinical outcomes and can prevent bariatric surgery: a single center experience.

Q1 Medicine BMC Obesity Pub Date : 2017-02-21 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40608-017-0147-3
Flavio A Cadegiani, Gustavo C Diniz, Gabriella Alves
{"title":"Aggressive clinical approach to obesity improves metabolic and clinical outcomes and can prevent bariatric surgery: a single center experience.","authors":"Flavio A Cadegiani,&nbsp;Gustavo C Diniz,&nbsp;Gabriella Alves","doi":"10.1186/s40608-017-0147-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of bariatric procedures has exponentially increased in the past decade, as a result of the lack of successful clinical weight-loss interventions. The main reasons for the failure of clinical obesity management are: (1) anti-obesity medications are administered as monotherapies (or pre-combined drugs); (2) lack of combination between pharmacotherapy and non-pharmacological modalities; (3) short duration of pharmacotherapy for obesity; (4) lack of weight-loss maintenance strategies; (5) misunderstanding of the complex pathophysiology of obesity; and (6) underprescription of anti-obesity medications. We developed a protocol that can potentially overcome the drawbacks that may lead to the failure of clinical therapy for obesity. The aim of this study is therefore to report the clinical and metabolic effects of our proposed obesity-management protocol over a 2-year period, and to determine whether this more intensive approach to obesity management is feasible and a possible alternative to bariatric surgery in patients with moderate-to-severe obesity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 43 patients in whom bariatric surgery was indicated. Patients underwent an intensive anti-obesity protocol that included pharmacotherapy with multiple drugs; intense surveillance with monthly body analysis by air-displacement plethysmography, electrical bioimpedance, and 3D body scans; weekly psychotherapy; diet planning with a dietician every 2 months; and exercises at least 3 times a week with exercises prescribed by a personal trainer at least once a month. Body weight (BW), total weight excess (TWE), obesity class, body mass index, fat weight, muscle weight, waist circumference, and visceral fat were analyzed. Markers of lipid and glucose metabolism, liver function, and inflammation were also evaluated. Therapeutic success was defined as >20% BW loss or >50% decrease in TWE after 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant improvements were observed in all clinical and metabolic parameters. Thirty-eight (88.4%) patients achieved 10% BW loss, and 32 (74.4%) achieved 20% BW loss. TWE decreased by >50% in 35 (81.4%) patients. Forty (93.0%) patients were able to avoid bariatric surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An intensive clinical approach to obesity management can be an effective alternative to bariatric surgery, although further randomized controlled studies are necessary to validate our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":37440,"journal":{"name":"BMC Obesity","volume":"4 ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40608-017-0147-3","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40608-017-0147-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: The number of bariatric procedures has exponentially increased in the past decade, as a result of the lack of successful clinical weight-loss interventions. The main reasons for the failure of clinical obesity management are: (1) anti-obesity medications are administered as monotherapies (or pre-combined drugs); (2) lack of combination between pharmacotherapy and non-pharmacological modalities; (3) short duration of pharmacotherapy for obesity; (4) lack of weight-loss maintenance strategies; (5) misunderstanding of the complex pathophysiology of obesity; and (6) underprescription of anti-obesity medications. We developed a protocol that can potentially overcome the drawbacks that may lead to the failure of clinical therapy for obesity. The aim of this study is therefore to report the clinical and metabolic effects of our proposed obesity-management protocol over a 2-year period, and to determine whether this more intensive approach to obesity management is feasible and a possible alternative to bariatric surgery in patients with moderate-to-severe obesity.

Methods: This retrospective study involved 43 patients in whom bariatric surgery was indicated. Patients underwent an intensive anti-obesity protocol that included pharmacotherapy with multiple drugs; intense surveillance with monthly body analysis by air-displacement plethysmography, electrical bioimpedance, and 3D body scans; weekly psychotherapy; diet planning with a dietician every 2 months; and exercises at least 3 times a week with exercises prescribed by a personal trainer at least once a month. Body weight (BW), total weight excess (TWE), obesity class, body mass index, fat weight, muscle weight, waist circumference, and visceral fat were analyzed. Markers of lipid and glucose metabolism, liver function, and inflammation were also evaluated. Therapeutic success was defined as >20% BW loss or >50% decrease in TWE after 1 year.

Results: Significant improvements were observed in all clinical and metabolic parameters. Thirty-eight (88.4%) patients achieved 10% BW loss, and 32 (74.4%) achieved 20% BW loss. TWE decreased by >50% in 35 (81.4%) patients. Forty (93.0%) patients were able to avoid bariatric surgery.

Conclusion: An intensive clinical approach to obesity management can be an effective alternative to bariatric surgery, although further randomized controlled studies are necessary to validate our findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
积极的临床方法对肥胖改善代谢和临床结果,并可以防止减肥手术:单一中心的经验。
背景:在过去十年中,由于缺乏成功的临床减肥干预措施,减肥手术的数量呈指数增长。临床肥胖管理失败的主要原因有:(1)抗肥胖药物单用(或联合用药);(2)药物治疗与非药物治疗缺乏结合;(3)肥胖症药物治疗持续时间短;(4)缺乏减肥维持策略;(5)对肥胖复杂病理生理的误解;(6)抗肥胖药物处方不足。我们开发了一种方案,可以潜在地克服可能导致肥胖临床治疗失败的缺点。因此,本研究的目的是报告我们提出的肥胖管理方案在2年期间的临床和代谢效果,并确定这种更强化的肥胖管理方法是否可行,以及在中度至重度肥胖患者中是否可以替代减肥手术。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了43例需要进行减肥手术的患者。患者接受了强化抗肥胖方案,包括多种药物的药物治疗;加强监测,每月通过空气置换容积脉搏图、电生物阻抗和3D身体扫描进行身体分析;每周一次的心理治疗;每两个月与营养师一起制定饮食计划;每周至少锻炼3次,每月至少一次由私人教练指定的锻炼。分析体重(BW)、总超重(TWE)、肥胖等级、体重指数、脂肪重量、肌肉重量、腰围和内脏脂肪。脂质和糖代谢、肝功能和炎症指标也进行了评估。治疗成功的定义是1年后体重损失>20%或TWE下降>50%。结果:所有临床和代谢参数均有显著改善。38例(88.4%)患者BW损失达到10%,32例(74.4%)患者BW损失达到20%。35例(81.4%)患者TWE下降>50%。40例(93.0%)患者能够避免减肥手术。结论:尽管需要进一步的随机对照研究来验证我们的发现,但强化的临床方法可以成为减肥手术的有效替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Obesity
BMC Obesity Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Cesation (2019). Information not localized.
期刊最新文献
Family food environment factors associated with obesity outcomes in early childhood. Design and methods of the Healthy Kids & Families study: a parent-focused community health worker-delivered childhood obesity prevention intervention. Larger omental adipocytes correlate with greater Fetuin-A reduction following sleeve gastrectomy. "I love having a healthy lifestyle" - a qualitative study investigating body mass index trajectories from childhood to mid-adulthood. Family Spirit Nurture (FSN) - a randomized controlled trial to prevent early childhood obesity in American Indian populations: trial rationale and study protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1