[Evaluation of a new immunochromatographic kit for enhanced detection of influenza B virus].

Yasushi Ashikawa, Yoshio Takasaki, Shizuo Shindo, Yuji Yamashita, Keigo Shibao, Takashi Yokoyama, Takato Yokoyama, Minako Iwaya, Yumi Kiyomatsu, Hiroshi Miyamoto
{"title":"[Evaluation of a new immunochromatographic kit for enhanced detection of influenza B virus].","authors":"Yasushi Ashikawa,&nbsp;Yoshio Takasaki,&nbsp;Shizuo Shindo,&nbsp;Yuji Yamashita,&nbsp;Keigo Shibao,&nbsp;Takashi Yokoyama,&nbsp;Takato Yokoyama,&nbsp;Minako Iwaya,&nbsp;Yumi Kiyomatsu,&nbsp;Hiroshi Miyamoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have evaluated a new immunochromatographic kit, \"KBM LineCheck Flu AB\", which had been developed for enhanced detection of influenza B viruses. Five strains of influenza A and B viruses were tested for reactivity and detection limits of the kit. Compared with the detection limits of commercially available kit of QuickNavi-Flu, \"KBM LineCheck Flu AB\" showed a nearly equal reactivity to influenza A viruses, but quadruple reactivity to 2 influenza B viruses. Also, \"KBM LineCheck Flu AB\" exhibited high specificity when tested in 130 influenza-negative culture specimens derived from 24 adult volunteers. Furthermore, \"KBM LineCheck Flu AB\" was clinically evaluated by using 866 specimens, including 190 nasal swabs, 201 nasal aspirations, 262 self-blown nasal discharges, and 213 pharyngeal swabs. Compared with the results of QuickNavi-Flu for influenza A, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs were calculated to be 95.8%, 92.0%, 95.0%, and 94.8%, respectively. Whereas, as to influenza B, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs was calculated to be 96.3%, 98.5%, 96.2%, and 93.4%, respectively. Similarly, compared with the results of influenza A viral culture, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs was calculated to be 95.3%, 91.0%, 93.9%, and 92.5%, respectively. Regarding influenza B culture, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs were calculated to be 95.8%, 97.5%, 95.1%, 91.5%, respectively. Overall, we concluded that the \"KBM LineCheck Flu AB\" is useful and suitable for diagnosis of influenza A and especially influenza B.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 1","pages":"25-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have evaluated a new immunochromatographic kit, "KBM LineCheck Flu AB", which had been developed for enhanced detection of influenza B viruses. Five strains of influenza A and B viruses were tested for reactivity and detection limits of the kit. Compared with the detection limits of commercially available kit of QuickNavi-Flu, "KBM LineCheck Flu AB" showed a nearly equal reactivity to influenza A viruses, but quadruple reactivity to 2 influenza B viruses. Also, "KBM LineCheck Flu AB" exhibited high specificity when tested in 130 influenza-negative culture specimens derived from 24 adult volunteers. Furthermore, "KBM LineCheck Flu AB" was clinically evaluated by using 866 specimens, including 190 nasal swabs, 201 nasal aspirations, 262 self-blown nasal discharges, and 213 pharyngeal swabs. Compared with the results of QuickNavi-Flu for influenza A, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs were calculated to be 95.8%, 92.0%, 95.0%, and 94.8%, respectively. Whereas, as to influenza B, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs was calculated to be 96.3%, 98.5%, 96.2%, and 93.4%, respectively. Similarly, compared with the results of influenza A viral culture, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs was calculated to be 95.3%, 91.0%, 93.9%, and 92.5%, respectively. Regarding influenza B culture, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs were calculated to be 95.8%, 97.5%, 95.1%, 91.5%, respectively. Overall, we concluded that the "KBM LineCheck Flu AB" is useful and suitable for diagnosis of influenza A and especially influenza B.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[一种新型增强乙型流感病毒检测免疫层析试剂盒的评价]。
我们评估了一种新的免疫层析试剂盒“KBM LineCheck Flu AB”,该试剂盒已开发用于增强乙型流感病毒的检测。对5株甲型和乙型流感病毒进行了反应性和检出限测试。与市售QuickNavi-Flu试剂盒的检出限相比,“KBM LineCheck Flu AB”对甲型流感病毒的反应性几乎相同,但对2种乙型流感病毒的反应性提高了4倍。此外,“KBM LineCheck Flu AB”在来自24名成年志愿者的130个流感阴性培养标本中测试时显示出高特异性。此外,通过使用866份样本对“KBM LineCheck Flu AB”进行临床评估,其中包括190份鼻拭子、201份鼻吸气、262份自吹鼻分泌物和213份咽拭子。与quickavi - flu对甲型流感的检测结果相比,鼻拭子、鼻呼液、自吹鼻分泌物和咽拭子的检测效率分别为95.8%、92.0%、95.0%和94.8%。而对于乙型流感,鼻拭子、鼻呼液、自吹鼻分泌物和咽拭子的检测效率分别为96.3%、98.5%、96.2%和93.4%。同样,与甲型流感病毒培养结果相比,鼻拭子、鼻呼出物、自吹鼻分泌物和咽拭子的检测效率分别为95.3%、91.0%、93.9%和92.5%。对于B型流感培养,计算鼻拭子、鼻吐液、自吹鼻分泌物和咽拭子的检测效率分别为95.8%、97.5%、95.1%、91.5%。总之,我们认为“KBM LineCheck Flu AB”是有用的,适合诊断甲型流感,特别是乙型流感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Japanese Case of COVID-19 Caused by Omicron Strain with Y453F Substitution. [Evaluation of Methicillin Resistance Determination Time for MRSA Using Fully Automated Rapid Identification Susceptibility testing system RAISAS S4]. [Evaluation of the Clinical Validity of the Clostridioides difficile Nucleic Acid Detection Kit "Smart Gene® CD ToxinB"]. [Relationship between Serotypes and Biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica and the Names of Identified Bacteria in the Microbial Identification and Susceptibility Testing Devices]. Comparison of Microorganism Detection, Time to Positivity, and Time-Dependent Shift in Viable Bacterial Count from VersaTREK and BacT/ALERT 3D Blood Culture Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1